Herbicide treatments in viticulture can generate highly contrasting mosaics of vegetated and bare vineyards, of which vegetated fields often provide better conditions for biodiversity. In southern Switzerland, where herbicides are applied at large scales, vegetated vineyards are limited in extent and isolated from one another, potentially limiting the distribution and dispersal ability of organisms.
We tested the separate and interactive effects of habitat amount and fragmentation on invertebrate abundance using a multi-scale framework, along with additional environmental factors. We identified which variables at which scales were most important in predicting patterns of invertebrate abundance.
We used a factorial design to sample across a gradient of habitat amount (area of vegetated vineyards, measured as percentage of landscape PLAND) and fragmentation (number of vegetated patches, measured as patch density PD). Using 10 different spatial scales, we identified the factors and scales that most strongly predicted invertebrate abundance and tested potential interactions between habitat amount and fragmentation.
Habitat amount (PLAND index) was most important in predicting invertebrate numbers at a field scale (50 m radius). In contrast, we found a negative effect of fragmentation (PD) at a broad scale of 450 m radius, but no interactive effect between the two.
The spatial scales at which habitat amount and fragmentation affect invertebrates differ, underpinning the importance of spatially explicit study designs in disentangling the effects between habitat amount and configuration. We showed that the amount of vegetated vineyards has more influence on invertebrate abundance, but that fragmentation also contributed substantially. This suggests that efforts for augmenting the area of vegetated vineyards is more beneficial for invertebrate numbers than attempts to connect them.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arlettaz R, Maurer ML, Mosimann-Kampe P, Nusslé S, Abadi F, Braunisch V, Schaub M (2012) New vineyard cultivation practices create patchy ground vegetation, favouring woodlarks. J Ornithol 153:229–238
Bartón K (2016) Mumin: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.10.6. https://cran.R-project.Org/package=mumin
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Bivand R, Piras G (2015) Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. J Stat Softw 63:1–36
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135
Bowman J, Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L (2002) Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology 83:2049–2055
Braaker S, Ghazoul J, Obrist M, Moretti M (2014) Habitat connectivity shapes urban arthropod communities: the key role of green roofs. Ecology 95:1010–1021
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
Chambers CL, Cushman SA, Medina-Fitoria A, Martínez-Fonseca J, Chávez-Velásquez M (2016) Influences of scale on bat habitat relationships in a forested landscape in Nicaragua. Landscape Ecol 31:299–1318
Coxwell CC, Bock CE (1995) Spatial variation in diurnal surface temperatures and the distribution and abundance of an alpine grasshopper. Oecologia 104:433–439
Cushman SA, Gutzweiler K, Evans JS, McGarigal K (2010) The gradient paradigm: a conceptual and analytical framework for landscape ecology. Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, New York, pp 83–108
Cushman SA, McGarigal K, Neel MC (2008) Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic 8:691–703
Cushman SA, Shirk AJ, Landguth EL (2013) Landscape genetics and limiting factors. Conserv Genet 14:263–274
Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Diekötter T, García Márquez J, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão P, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne P, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore A, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46
Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2008) Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations. Landscape Ecol 23:159–168
ESRI (2015) Arcgis 10.3.1 for desktop. In: Institute E. S. R. (ed). Redlands, California
Evans JS, Oakleaf J, Cushman SA, Theobald D (2014) An arcgis toolbox for surface gradient and geomorphometric modeling, version 2.0–0
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2008) Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5426–5429
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515
Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663
Fahrig L, Rytwinski T (2009) Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis. Ecol and Soc 14: 21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art21/
Flather CH, Bevers M (2002) Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement. Am Nat 159:40–56
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockstrom J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342
Gelman A, Su Y-S (2015) Arm: data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm
Grand J, Buonaccorsi J, Cushman SA, Griffin CR, Neel MC (2004) A multiscale landscape approach to predicting bird and moth rarity hotspots in a threatened pitch pine–scrub oak community. Conserv Biol 18:1063–1077
Haddad NM, Gonzalez A, Brudvig LA, Burt MA, Levey DJ, Damschen EI (2017) Experimental evidence does not support the habitat amount hypothesis. Ecography 40:48–55
Hanski I (2015) Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J Biogeogr 42:989–993
Holland J, Fahrig L (2000) Effect of woody borders on insect density and diversity in crop fields: a landscape-scale analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:115–122
Holland JD, Fahrig L, Cappuccino N (2005) Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat–beetle interactions. Oikos 110:101–108
Jaeger JA (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 15:115–130
Korner-Nievergelt F (2015) Bayesian data analysis in ecology using linear models with R, Bugs, and Stan. Academic Press, Amsterdam
Krebs JR, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB, Siriwardena GM (1999) The second silent spring? Nature 400:611–612
Laforge MP, Vander Wal E, Brook RK, Bayne EM, McLoughlin PD (2015) Process-focussed, multi-grain resource selection functions. Ecol Modell 305:10–21
Lawton JH (1995) Extinction risks. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Population dynamics principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–163
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967
Martin AE, Fahrig L (2012) Measuring and selecting scales of effect for landscape predictors in species-habitat models. Ecol Appl 22:2277–2292
McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345
McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) Fragstats v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. v4 edn, pp. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, Timm BC, Cushman SA (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landsc Ecol 31:1161–1175
Melo GL, Sponchiado J, Caceres NC, Fahrig L (2017) Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for south American small mammals. Biol Conserv 209:304–314
Mendenhall CD, Karp DS, Meyer CFJ, Hadly EA, Daily GC (2014) Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509:213–217
Miguet P, Jackson HB, Jackson ND, Martin AE, Fahrig L (2016) What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species? Landscape Ecol 31:1177–1194
Mortelliti A, Amori G, Capizzi D, Cervone C, Fagiani S, Pollini B, Boitani L (2011) Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents. J Appl Ecol 48:153–162
Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2004) Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecol 19:435–455
Pedro ARS, Simonetti JA (2015) The relative influence of forest loss and fragmentation on insectivorous bats: does the type of matrix matter? Landscape Ecol 30:1561–1572
R Development Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
Radford JQ, Bennett AF (2007) The relative importance of landscape properties for woodland birds in agricultural environments. J Appl Ecol 44:737–747
Rybicki J, Hanski I (2013) Species-area relationships and extinctions caused by habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 16(Suppl 1):27–38
Schüepp C, Herzog F, Entling MH (2014) Disentangling multiple drivers of pollination in a landscape-scale experiment. Proc R Soc B 281:20132667. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2667
Seibold S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Fahrig L, Förster B, Heurich M, Hothorn T, Scheipl F, Thorn S, Müller J (2017) An experimental test of the habitat-amount hypothesis for saproxylic beetles in a forested region. Ecology 98:1613–1622
Trzcinski MK, Fahrig L, Merriam G (1999) Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecol Appl 9:586–593
Wan HY, McGarigal K, Ganey JL, Lauret V, Timm BC, Cushman SA (2017) Meta-replication reveals non-stationarity in multi-scale habitat selection of Mexican spotted owl. Condor 119:641–658
Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397
Winter S, Bauer T, Strauss P et al (2018) Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:2484–2495
Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Beier P, Cushman SA, Vickers TW, Boyce WM (2014) Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: Pumas as a case study. Landscape Ecol 29:541–557
We thank all farmers and the VITIVAL (Valais association for viticulture) groups for their collaboration and allowing us to do this study on their vineyards. We are grateful to Valentin Moser for field and lab assistance and Luca Chiaverini for help with GIS analyses. We further thank both reviewers for their valuable comments and inputs which improved the quality of this paper substantially. This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant 31003A_149780 to Alain Jacot.
About this article
Cite this article
Bosco, L., Wan, H.Y., Cushman, S.A. et al. Separating the effects of habitat amount and fragmentation on invertebrate abundance using a multi-scale framework. Landscape Ecol 34, 105–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0748-3
- Habitat amount hypothesis
- Patch density