Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Conflict over land use is endemic to natural resource management given the limited availability of resources and multiple stakeholders’ interests, but there has been limited research to examine conflict from an integrative social-ecological perspective.

Objectives

We sought to determine how the potential for land use conflict—a social construct—was related (or not) to ecological systems of landscapes.

Methods

Using participatory mapping data from a regional case study in Australia, we identified the potential for land use conflict using a model that combines spatially-explicit place values with preferences for specific land uses related to development and conservation. Multiple proxies of biodiversity were used to evaluate the landscape’s ecological systems at ecosystems and species levels. Range maps were used to identify areas of high species diversity value using the conservation planning software Zonation.

Results

We spatially intersected conflict areas with landscape attributes and found the potential for conflict over conservation to be higher in coastal areas than inland areas, more likely to be located in areas with moderate vegetation cover, more concentrated in ecosystems classified as ‘No Concern’ with moderate to high native vegetation. Potential conflict over conservation was disproportionately higher in areas with higher species diversity derived from conservation modelling.

Conclusions

The social-ecological associations in conflict analysis can inform impact assessment of land use plans on biodiversity, assist development of effective approaches to reconcile conservation and other land uses, support conservation planning by identifying priorities for conflict negotiation and understanding underlying factors for conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Diduck AP, Doubleday NC, Johnson DS, Marschke M, McConney P (2009) Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Australian demographic statistics December 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013

  • Bengston DN, Fletcher JO, Nelson KC (2004) Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landsc Urban Plan 69:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer HL (2012) Geospatial modelling environment (Version 0.7.1.0). (software). http://www.spatialecology.com/gme

  • Binney J (2008) The economic and social implications of the Baffle Creek Basin water resource plan. Marsden Jacob Associates, Camberwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD, Grover H, Bernhardt S, Tang Z, Whitaker B, Spence C (2006) Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters: a multi-criteria spatial analysis. Environ Manag 38:597–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Brabyn L (2012) The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification. Appl Geogr 35:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Donovan S (2013) Escaping the national forest planning Quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use. J For 111(2):115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Raymond CM (2014) Methods for identifying land-use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landsc Urban Plan 122:196–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Schreier H, Thompson WA, Vertinsky I (1994) Linking multiple accounts with GIS as decision support system to resolve forestry/wildlife conflicts. J Environ Manag 42(4):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH (2010) Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plan 97(2):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62:296–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM, Orenstein DE, Childers DL, Gragson TL, Grimm NB, Grove JM, Harlan SL, Kaye JP, Knapp AK (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG (1998) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econom 25:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land-use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment (2015) Species of National Environmental Significance. http://www.environment.gov.au/science/erin/databases-maps/snes. Accessed 17 Apr 2015

  • Díaz S, Fargione J, Chapin Iii FS, Tilman D (2006) Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol 4:1300–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1993) Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int Secur 18:79–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR (2004) Land-use planning challenges: coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and liveable communities. J Am Plan Assoc 70:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray S, Chan A, Clark D, Jordan R (2012) Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecol Modell 229:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2012) Baffle Basin Assessment, Burnett-Mary Regional Management Group NRM Region

  • Hausner VH, Brown G, Lægreid E (2015) Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land-use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy 49:446–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastik R, Basso S, Geitner C, Haida C, Poljanec A, Portaccio A, Vrščaj B, Walzer C (2015) Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48:608–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersperger AM, Ioja C, Steiner F, Tudor CA (2015) Comprehensive consideration of conflicts in the land-use planning process: a conceptual contribution. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 10:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R, Dyer GA, Lozada-Ellison LM, Gimona A, Martin-Ortega J, Munoz-Rojas J, Gordon IJ (2015) A social-ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity. Glob Environ Change-Human Policy Dimens 34:22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives CD, Biggs D, Hardy MJ, Lechner AM, Wolnicki M, Raymond CM (2015) Using social data in strategic environmental assessment to conserve biodiversity. Land Use Policy 47:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob GR, Schreyer R (1980) Conflict in outdoor recreation, a theoretical perspective. J Leisure Res 12(4):368–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi A, Brown G, Hockings M (2015) Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots. Appl Geogr 63:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F, Huber N, Hergert R, Bolliger J, Moran LS, Hersperger AM (2017) Conflicts between decentralized renewable electricity production and landscape services–A spatially-explicit quantitative assessment for Switzerland. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klare MT (2001) Resource wars: the new landscape of global conflict. Metropolitan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight AT, Cowling RM, Difford M, Campbell BM (2010) Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conserv Biol 24:1348–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J, Bavinck M (2005) The governance perspective. Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Kumar M (2008) Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econom 64:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys AJ, Vanclay JK (2011) Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy 28:574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Meller L, Lepanen J, Montesino Pouzols A, Arponen A, Kujala H (2012) Zonation: spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.1 user manual Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsinki

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analysing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2011) Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog Phys Geogr 35(5):575–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (2015) Regional Ecosystem Description Database (REDD). https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/download/. Accessed 1 Sept 2015

  • Queensland Government (2016) Threats to wildlife. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/threats/. Accessed 19 Apr 2017

  • Recher H, Lim L (1990) A review of current ideas of the extinction, conservation and management of Australia’s terrestrial vertebrate fauna. Surrey Beatty & Sons for the Ecological Society of Australia, Baulkham Hills, pp 287–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DP, Hull RB (2001) Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conserv Biol 15:970–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Ballesteros E (2011) Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism An approach from Agua Blanca, Ecuador. Tour Manag 32(3):655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C, van Oosten C (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:8349–8356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Donnelly MP, Wittmann K, Laidlaw S (1995) Interpersonal versus social-values conflict. Leisure Sci 17(3):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Needham MD, Cline RC Jr (2007) Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists. J Leisure Res 39(1):182–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AL, Kujala H, Ives CD, Gordon A, Lentini PE, Wintle BA, Nicholson E, Raymond CM (2014) Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 28:992–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yell123 (2014) Business directories. http://yell123.com/. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Azadeh Karimi & Marc Hockings

  2. Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Azadeh Karimi

Authors
  1. Azadeh Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Hockings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azadeh Karimi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karimi, A., Hockings, M. A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management. Landscape Ecol 33, 691–710 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0636-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0636-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation