Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 691–710 | Cite as

A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management

  • Azadeh Karimi
  • Marc Hockings
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Conflict over land use is endemic to natural resource management given the limited availability of resources and multiple stakeholders’ interests, but there has been limited research to examine conflict from an integrative social-ecological perspective.

Objectives

We sought to determine how the potential for land use conflict—a social construct—was related (or not) to ecological systems of landscapes.

Methods

Using participatory mapping data from a regional case study in Australia, we identified the potential for land use conflict using a model that combines spatially-explicit place values with preferences for specific land uses related to development and conservation. Multiple proxies of biodiversity were used to evaluate the landscape’s ecological systems at ecosystems and species levels. Range maps were used to identify areas of high species diversity value using the conservation planning software Zonation.

Results

We spatially intersected conflict areas with landscape attributes and found the potential for conflict over conservation to be higher in coastal areas than inland areas, more likely to be located in areas with moderate vegetation cover, more concentrated in ecosystems classified as ‘No Concern’ with moderate to high native vegetation. Potential conflict over conservation was disproportionately higher in areas with higher species diversity derived from conservation modelling.

Conclusions

The social-ecological associations in conflict analysis can inform impact assessment of land use plans on biodiversity, assist development of effective approaches to reconcile conservation and other land uses, support conservation planning by identifying priorities for conflict negotiation and understanding underlying factors for conflict.

Keywords

Land use conflict Conservation conflict Social data Ecological evaluation Conservation planning Spatial prioritization 

Supplementary material

10980_2018_636_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Diduck AP, Doubleday NC, Johnson DS, Marschke M, McConney P (2009) Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Australian demographic statistics December 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013
  3. Bengston DN, Fletcher JO, Nelson KC (2004) Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landsc Urban Plan 69:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyer HL (2012) Geospatial modelling environment (Version 0.7.1.0). (software). http://www.spatialecology.com/gme
  5. Binney J (2008) The economic and social implications of the Baffle Creek Basin water resource plan. Marsden Jacob Associates, CamberwellGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody SD, Grover H, Bernhardt S, Tang Z, Whitaker B, Spence C (2006) Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters: a multi-criteria spatial analysis. Environ Manag 38:597–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown G, Brabyn L (2012) The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification. Appl Geogr 35:84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown G, Donovan S (2013) Escaping the national forest planning Quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use. J For 111(2):115–125Google Scholar
  9. Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown G, Raymond CM (2014) Methods for identifying land-use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landsc Urban Plan 122:196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown S, Schreier H, Thompson WA, Vertinsky I (1994) Linking multiple accounts with GIS as decision support system to resolve forestry/wildlife conflicts. J Environ Manag 42(4):349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH (2010) Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plan 97(2):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62:296–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM, Orenstein DE, Childers DL, Gragson TL, Grimm NB, Grove JM, Harlan SL, Kaye JP, Knapp AK (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG (1998) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econom 25:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land-use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department of Environment (2015) Species of National Environmental Significance. http://www.environment.gov.au/science/erin/databases-maps/snes. Accessed 17 Apr 2015
  18. Díaz S, Fargione J, Chapin Iii FS, Tilman D (2006) Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol 4:1300–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gleick PH (1993) Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int Secur 18:79–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godschalk DR (2004) Land-use planning challenges: coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and liveable communities. J Am Plan Assoc 70:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray S, Chan A, Clark D, Jordan R (2012) Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecol Modell 229:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2012) Baffle Basin Assessment, Burnett-Mary Regional Management Group NRM RegionGoogle Scholar
  24. Hausner VH, Brown G, Lægreid E (2015) Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land-use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy 49:446–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hastik R, Basso S, Geitner C, Haida C, Poljanec A, Portaccio A, Vrščaj B, Walzer C (2015) Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48:608–623Google Scholar
  26. Hersperger AM, Ioja C, Steiner F, Tudor CA (2015) Comprehensive consideration of conflicts in the land-use planning process: a conceptual contribution. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 10:5–13Google Scholar
  27. Hill R, Dyer GA, Lozada-Ellison LM, Gimona A, Martin-Ortega J, Munoz-Rojas J, Gordon IJ (2015) A social-ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity. Glob Environ Change-Human Policy Dimens 34:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ives CD, Biggs D, Hardy MJ, Lechner AM, Wolnicki M, Raymond CM (2015) Using social data in strategic environmental assessment to conserve biodiversity. Land Use Policy 47:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacob GR, Schreyer R (1980) Conflict in outdoor recreation, a theoretical perspective. J Leisure Res 12(4):368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karimi A, Brown G, Hockings M (2015) Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots. Appl Geogr 63:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kienast F, Huber N, Hergert R, Bolliger J, Moran LS, Hersperger AM (2017) Conflicts between decentralized renewable electricity production and landscape services–A spatially-explicit quantitative assessment for Switzerland. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klare MT (2001) Resource wars: the new landscape of global conflict. Metropolitan Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Difford M, Campbell BM (2010) Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conserv Biol 24:1348–1358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kooiman J, Bavinck M (2005) The governance perspective. Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar P, Kumar M (2008) Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econom 64:808–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leys AJ, Vanclay JK (2011) Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy 28:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Moilanen A, Meller L, Lepanen J, Montesino Pouzols A, Arponen A, Kujala H (2012) Zonation: spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.1 user manual Helsingin Yliopisto, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analysing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2011) Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog Phys Geogr 35(5):575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Queensland Government (2015) Regional Ecosystem Description Database (REDD). https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/download/. Accessed 1 Sept 2015
  44. Queensland Government (2016) Threats to wildlife. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/threats/. Accessed 19 Apr 2017
  45. Recher H, Lim L (1990) A review of current ideas of the extinction, conservation and management of Australia’s terrestrial vertebrate fauna. Surrey Beatty & Sons for the Ecological Society of Australia, Baulkham Hills, pp 287–301Google Scholar
  46. Robertson DP, Hull RB (2001) Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conserv Biol 15:970–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruiz-Ballesteros E (2011) Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism An approach from Agua Blanca, Ecuador. Tour Manag 32(3):655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C, van Oosten C (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:8349–8356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaske JJ, Donnelly MP, Wittmann K, Laidlaw S (1995) Interpersonal versus social-values conflict. Leisure Sci 17(3):205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vaske JJ, Needham MD, Cline RC Jr (2007) Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists. J Leisure Res 39(1):182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whitehead AL, Kujala H, Ives CD, Gordon A, Lentini PE, Wintle BA, Nicholson E, Raymond CM (2014) Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 28:992–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yell123 (2014) Business directories. http://yell123.com/. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations