Implications of forest type and land tenure diversity for the sustainability of ecosystem services provided by northern Amazonia’s multiple-use tree species
- 36 Downloads
As global landscapes continue to change, the sustainability of the ecosystem services they support are increasingly coming into question. In the rapidly changing neotropics, multiple-use plants epitomize sources of ecosystem services. To sustain the relationship that exists between such plants and human populations, a sound understanding of their well-being is required.
Density data on multiple-use plants were compared across forest types and land tenure classes to understand the implications of these two spatial frames of reference for landscape sustainability.
The density of an aggregate sample of seventeen multiple-use and a sub-sample of five species were examined relative to forest type and land tenure class across fourteen Rupununi, Southern Guyana, study sites. The examination of plant density based on the two sample sizes was used to make inferences on how the two frames of reference may impact landscape sustainability.
The mean density of the aggregate sample was highest in three of six forest types, but showed no statistical difference across land tenure classes. When individual species were considered mean densities showed no statistical difference across land tenure classes, but differences were observed for three species across forest types. Mean densities were highest in forest types within which swidden agriculture occurs and in the protected area where logging is prohibited.
Our findings suggested that in changing tropical landscapes plant species distribution can be predicted by forest types, but land tenure classes may provide clearer signals as to where a species well-being and hence ecosystem services may be compromised.
KeywordsMultiple-use plants Ecosystem services Forest type Land tenure Landscape diversity Landscape sustainability Tropical landscapes
This paper represents hours of dedicated work and service from persons all across the Rupununi. In particular, we thank the teams in the fourteen villages where we collected data on multiple-use plant species: Benedict Joseph, Thaddeus Joseph, Ozias James, Orville Milton, Keary Duncan, John Duncan, John Loyola, Handley Thomas, Ram Henry, Alphaeus Thomas, Brucelee Henry, Selverio Edwards, Persaud Moses, Gilbert Domingo, Randolph Brown, Davis Brown, Cameron Anton, Cyril Jonas, Andrew Mandook, Mr. Martin, Billy Martin, Eli Martin, Alphonso Francis, Edgar Caitan, Johnny, William Pereira, Aaron Pereira, Carl St. Hill, Carlson St. Hill, Donald Andries, Jackson Joel, Alexis Nagarine, Danford Moses, Ricky Moses, Marcus Moses, Carro Moses, and Stephen Andries. We are grateful to the people of the Rupununi, in particular the leadership of the North Rupununi District Development Board (NRDDB), Bina Hill Institute and the South Central Peoples Development Association (SCPDA). At Project Fauna Dr. Jeff Luzar and Ms. Ketlen Williams, supported data collection. At UT Dallas Aravind Sivasailam and Muna Shah provided assistance in a number of areas. The Guyana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunction with the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs granted permission for this research. The Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission, Conservation International Guyana and the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission kindly provided base maps and maps of Amerindian communities. Funding for this project was made possible by the US National Science Foundation BE/CNH Grant 0837531.
- Amerindian Act, 29:01 Laws of Guyana, 37 (2006)Google Scholar
- Brandon K, Redford KH, Sanderson SE (1998) Parks in peril: people, politics and protected areas. Island Press, The Nature Conservancy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Cummings AR (2013) For logs, for traditional purposes and for food: identification of multiple-use plant species of Northern Amazonia and an assessment of factors associated with their distribution (Dissertationse ALL). Paper 17. Available from: http://surface.syr.edu/etd/17
- David B, Isaacs P, Johnny A, Johnson L, Pugsley M, Ramacindo C, Winter G, Winter Y (2006) Wa Wiizi—Wa Kaduzu: customary use of biological resources and related traditional practices within Wapichan territory in Guyana. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-MarshGoogle Scholar
- Environmental Defense Fund, Amazonian Network of Georeferenced Socio-Environmental Information, EcoSciencia, Gaia Amazonas, Instituto Socioambiental, Instituto Bien Comun, Woods Hole Research Center, Coordinadora De Las Organizaciones Indigenas De La Cuenca Amazonica (2017) Amazonian indigenous peoples territories and their forests related to climate change: analyses and policy options. Retrieved from: http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/indigenous-territories-barrier-to-deforestation.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan, 2018
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guyana (2009) Kanuku mountains protected area: five year management plan 2009–2013. Georgetown, GuyanaGoogle Scholar
- Fanshawe D (1952) The vegetation of British Guiana: a preliminary review (institute paper 29). Commonwealth Forest Institute, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Fearnside PM (1993) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: the effect of population and land tenure. Ambio 22:537–545Google Scholar
- Forte J (1996) Makusipe Komanto Iseru: sustaining Makushi way of life. North Rupununi District Development Board, GuyanaGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton LS (1991) Tropical forests: identifying and clarifying the issues. Unasylva 166:19–27Google Scholar
- Huber O, Zent S (1995) Indigenous people and vegetation in the Venezuelan Guayana: some ecological considerations. Sci Guaianae 5:37–64Google Scholar
- Iwokrama Act (1996) 20:04 Laws of Guyana, 34Google Scholar
- Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore III B, O'Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keith DA, Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Nicholson E, Aapala K, Alonso A, Asmussen M, Bachman S, Bassett A, Barrow EG, Benson JS, Bishop MJ, Bonifacio R, Brooks TM, Burgman MA, Comer P, Comín FA, Essl F, Faber-Langendoen D, Fairweather PG, Holdaway RJ, Jennings M, Kingsford RT, Lester RE, Mac Nally R, McCarthy MA, Moat J, Oliveira-Miranda MA, Pisanu P, Poulin B, Regan TJ, Riecken U, Spalding MD, Zambrano-Martínez S (2013) Scientific foundations for an IUCN red list of ecosystems. PLoS ONE 8:e62111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Naughton-Treves L, Wendland K (2013) Land Tenure and Tropical Forest Carbon Management. World Dev 55:1–84Google Scholar
- Peters CM (1996) Chapter I–III: introduction to the ecology of tropical forest resources. In: The ecology and management of non-timber forest resources. World Bank Technical Paper No. 322. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 5–97Google Scholar
- Posey DA (1992) Traditional knowledge, conservation and “the rain forest harvest”. In: Plotkin M, Famolare L (eds) Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products. Island Press, Washington, D.C., p 46Google Scholar
- Richards PW (1952) The tropical rainforest: an ecological study. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Roosmalen M (1985) Fruits of the Guianan flora. Institute of Systematic Botany, Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Sheil D, van Heist M (2000) Ecology for tropical forest management. Int For Rev 2:261–270Google Scholar
- Sivasailam A, Cummings AR (2017) Does the location of Amerindian communities provide signals about the spatial distribution of tree and palm species? In: Griffith DA, Chun Y, Dean DJ (eds) Advances in Geocomputation. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, Basel, pp 169–179Google Scholar
- The R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org
- van Andel TR (2000) Non-timber forest products of the north-west district of Guyana: part II A field guide. Tropenbos Foundation, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (1995) Breakfast of biodiversity: the truth about rain forest destruction. The Institute for Food and Development Policy, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- WCMC (1992) Protected areas of the world: a review of national systems. Nearctic and neotropical. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, vol 4Google Scholar
- Zimmerman B, Peres CA, Malcolm JR, Turner T (2001) Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environ Conserv 28:10–22Google Scholar