Species pool, human population, and global versus regional invasion patterns
Biological invasions are among the greatest global and regional threats to biomes in the Anthropocene. Islands, in particular, have been perceived to have higher vulnerability to invasions. Because of the dynamic nature of ongoing invasions, distinguishing regional patterns from global patterns and their underlying determinants remains a challenge.
We aim to comparatively examine global versus regional patterns of plant invasions and the possible underlying mechanisms. We also test whether there is a difference in degree of invasion and invasibility between mainland areas and islands.
We compiled and analyzed data from published sources for 100 mainland areas (i.e., regions, countries, states, and provinces) and 89 islands across the globe.
We find that (1) the pool of exotic species available intrinsically decreases as area of the land considered increases (at global scale, all is native), thus global invasion patterns assessed by exotic fraction (proportion of exotics) are primarily determined by land area; (2) because “exotic” is defined relative to the borders of the target region, “boundary effects” can result in regional differences in invasion patterns without any ecological processes being involved; and (3) human population density is closely linked to exotic fraction within regions that are defined by a single administrative border.
There were clear differences between global and regional patterns of plant invasions. We observed no difference in the exotic fraction-area relationship between mainland areas and islands, supporting what we refer to as the “island-mainland continuum concept” (i.e., no clear separation in the degree of invasion between islands and mainland area with regard to the effects of area). Because of scale-dependency in many observed patterns, future focus should be placed on the links between local, regional, and global invasion patterns.
KeywordsAnthropocene Area Boundary effects Comparison Globalization Homogenization Human “Island-mainland continuum”
We thank A. Liebhold, J. Long, M. Winter, and anonymous reviewers for offering data and/or helpful comments. M. Scobie and D. Sovilla of the National Environmental Modeling and Analysis Center (NEMAC) at the University of North Carolina—Asheville assisted with data collection on island invasions. This study was supported by a NSF Macrosystems Biology grant (DEB-1241932).
- Drake JA, Mooney HA, Di Castri F, Groves R, Kruger F, Rejmenak M, Williamson M (1989) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Elton J (1958) The Ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Elvidge CD, Imhoff ML, Baugh KE, Hobson V, Nelson I, Safran J, Dietz JB, Tuttle BT (2001) Night-time lights of the world: 1994–1995. Isprs J Photogramm 56(2):81–99Google Scholar
- Essl F, Moser D, Dirnböck T, Dullinger S, Milasowszky N, Winter M, Rabitsch W (2013) Native, alien, endemic, threatened, and extinct species diversity in European countries. Biol Conserv 164:90–97Google Scholar
- Grace J, Tilman D (1990) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Guo Q, Fei S, Dukes JS, Oswalt CM, Iannone III BV, Potter KM (2015) A unified approach for quantifying invasibility and degree of invasion. Ecology 96(10):2613–2621Google Scholar
- Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319(5865):948–952Google Scholar
- Iannone BV, Oswalt CM, Liebhold AM, Guo Q, Potter KM, Nunez-Mir G, Oswalt SN, Pijanowski BC, Fei S (2015) Region-specific patterns and drivers of macroscale forest plant invasions. Divers Distrib 21(10):1181–1192Google Scholar
- Iannone BV, Potter KM, Hamil KAD, Huang W, Zhang H, Guo, Q, Oswalt CM, Woodall CW, Fei S (2016) Evidence of biotic resistance to invasions in forests of the Eastern USA. Landscape Ecol 31(1):85–99Google Scholar
- Jiang H, Fan Q, Li J-T, Shi S, Li S, Liao W, Shu W (2011) Naturalization of alien plants in China. Biodivers Conserv 20(7):1545–1556Google Scholar
- Lambdon PW, Pysek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, Jarosik V, Pergl J, Winter M, Anastasiu P, Andriopoulos P, Bazos I, Brundu G, Celesti-Grapow L, Chassot P, Delipetrou P, Josefsson M, Kark S, Klotz S, Kokkoris Y, Kuhn I, Marchante H, Perglova I, Pino J, Vila M, Zikos A, Roy D, Hulme PE (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80(2):101–149Google Scholar
- Renne IJ, Tracy BF, Rejmánek M (2003) The rich get richer-responses. Front Ecol Environ 1(3):122–123Google Scholar
- Seebens SH, Essl F, Dawson W, Fuentes N, Moser D, Pergl J, Pyšek P, van Kleunen M, Weber E, Winter M, Blasius B (2015) Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob Change Biol 21(11):4128–4140Google Scholar
- Simberloff D (1995) Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas? Pac Sci 49(1):87–97Google Scholar
- Sol D (2000) Are islands more susceptible to be invaded than continents? Birds say no. Ecography 23(6):687–692Google Scholar
- van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit, Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent DL, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Baptiste MP, Poopath M, Schulze M, Seebens H, Shu W, Thomas J, Velayos M, Wieringa JJ, Pyšek P (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525(7567):100–103Google Scholar
- Vitousek PM, D’antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21(1):1–16Google Scholar
- Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar