High and dry: high elevations disproportionately exposed to regional climate change in Mediterranean-climate landscapes
- 660 Downloads
Predicting climate-driven species’ range shifts depends substantially on species’ exposure to climate change. Mountain landscapes contain a wide range of topoclimates and soil characteristics that are thought to mediate range shifts and buffer species’ exposure. Quantifying fine-scale patterns of exposure across mountainous terrain is a key step in understanding vulnerability of species to regional climate change.
We demonstrated a transferable, flexible approach for mapping climate change exposure in a moisture-limited, mountainous California landscape across 4 climate change projections under phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) for mid-(2040–2069) and end-of-century (2070–2099).
We produced a 149-year dataset (1951–2099) of modeled climatic water deficit (CWD), which is strongly associated with plant distributions, at 30-m resolution to map climate change exposure in the Tehachapi Mountains, California, USA. We defined climate change exposure in terms of departure from the 1951–1980 mean and historical range of variability in CWD in individual years and 3-year moving windows.
Climate change exposure was generally greatest at high elevations across all future projections, though we encountered moderate topographic buffering on poleward-facing slopes. Historically dry lowlands demonstrated the least exposure to climate change.
In moisture-limited, Mediterranean-climate landscapes, high elevations may experience the greatest exposure to climate change in the 21st century. High elevation species may thus be especially vulnerable to continued climate change as habitats shrink and historically energy-limited locations become increasingly moisture-limited in the future.
KeywordsClimate change Microenvironments Range shifts Climatic water deficit Microrefugia Topographic buffering
We gratefully acknowledge funding support from the National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology Program, NSF #EF-1065864. We thank our collaborating investigators A. Hall, K. Redmond and H. Regan for associated projects that led to this paper. We also thank J. Frew, C. Tague and L. Sweet for useful comments and suggestions. We thank the Tejon Ranch Company and the Tejon Ranch Conservancy for cooperation and land access. JM S-D acknowledges further support from the GRUMETS team 2014 SGR 1491 Generalitat de Catalunya grant. Finally, we appreciate useful comments from the journal subject editor and four peer reviewers.
- Anderson EA (1976) A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover. Technical report NWS 19. U.S National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Silver Spring, MD Google Scholar
- Curtis JA, Flint LE, Flint AL, Lundquist JD, Hudgens B, Boydston EE, Young JK (2014) Incorporating cold-air pooling into downscaled climate models increases potential refugia for snow-dependent species within the Sierra Nevada Ecoregion, CA. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106984 Google Scholar
- Davis FW, Sweet LC (2012) From mountain microclimates to the macroecology of tree species distributions in California. Mt Views 6:2–5Google Scholar
- De Frenne, P, Rodriguez-Sanchez F, Coomes DA, Baeten L, Verstraeten G, Vellend M, Bernhardt-Romermann M, Brown CD, Brunet J, Cornelis J, Decocq GM, Dierschke H, Eriksson O, Gilliam FS, Hedl R, Heinken T, Hermy M, Hommel P, Jenkins MA, Kelly DL, Kirby KJ, Mitchell FJG, Naaf T, Newman M, Peterken G, Petrik P, Schultz J, Sonnier G, Van Calster H, Waller DW, Walther G, White PS, Woods KD, Wulf M, Graae BJ, Verheyen K (2013) Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:18561–18565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Flint LE, Flint AL (2014) California Basin characteristic model: a dataset of historical and future hydrologic response to climate change: U.S. Geological Survey data release. doi: 10.5066/F76T0JPB
- Flint AL, Flint LE, Hevesi JA, Blainey JB (2004) Fundamental concepts of recharge in the desert southwest: a regional modeling perspective. In: Hogan JF, Phillips FM, Scanlon BR (eds) Groundwater recharge in a desert environment: The Southwestern United States. American Geophysical Union, Washington. doi: 10.1029/009WSA10 Google Scholar
- Gavin DG, Fitzpatrick MC, Gugger PF, Heath KD, Rodriguez-Sanchez F, Dobrowski SZ, Hampe A, Hu FS, Ashcroft MB, Bartlein PJ, Blois JS, Carstens BC, Davis EB, Lafontaine G, Edwards ME, Fernandez M, Henne PD, Herring EM, Holden ZA, Kong W, Liu J, Magri D, Matzke NJ, McGlone MS, Saltre F, Stigall AL, Tsai YE, Williams JW (2014) Climate refugia: joint inference from fossil records, species distribution models and phylogeography. New Phyto 204:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottfried M, Pauli H, Futschik A, Akhalkatsi M, Barancok P, Alonso JLB Coldea G, Dick J, Erschbamer B, Calzado MRF, Kazakis G, Krajci J, Larsson P, Mallum M, Michelsen O, Moiseev D, Moiseev P, Molau U, Merzouki A, Nagy L, Nakhutsrishvili G, Pedersen B, Pelino G, Puscas M, Rossi G, Stanisci A, Theurillat J, Tomaselli M, Villar L, Vittoz P, Vogiatzakis I, Grabherr G (2012) Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hijmans RJ (2015) Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.3-33. http://CRAN.R-project/org/package=raster
- Klausmeyer KR, Shaw MR, MacKenzie JB, Cameron DR (2011) Landscape-scale indicators of biodiversity’s vulnerability to climate change. Ecosphere 2:art 88. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00044.1
- Landres PB, Morgan P, Swanson FJ (1999) Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 9:1179–1188Google Scholar
- Lenoir J, Graae BJ, Aarrestad PA, Alsos IG, Armbruster WS, Austrheim G, Bergendorff C, Birks HJB, Brathen KA, Brunet J, Bruun HH, Dahlberg CJ, Decocq G, Diekmann M, Dynesius M, Ejrnaes R, Grytnes J, Hylander K, Klanderud K, Luoto M, Milbau A, Moora M, Nygaard B, Odland A, Ravolainen VT, Reinhardt S, Sandvik SM, Schei FH, Speed JDM, Tveraabak LU, Vandvik V, Velle LG, Virtanen R, Zobel M, Svenning J (2013) Local temperatures inferred from plant communities suggest strong spatial buffering of climate warming across Northern Europe. Glob Change Biol 19:1470–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maher SP, Morelli TL, Hershey M, Flint AL, Flint LE, Moritz C, Beissinger SR (in review) Erosion of refugia in the Sierra Nevada meadows network with climate change Google Scholar
- NRCS (2006) Natural Resources Conservation Service: U.S. General Soil Map (SSURGO/STATSGO2). http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/stat_data.html, http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/statsgo/description.html
- Ripley B (2015) tree: Classification and regression trees. R package version 1.0-36. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tree
- Rosenberg NJ, Blad BL, Verma SB (1983) Microclimate: the biological environment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Thorne JH, Boynton RM, Flint LE, Flint AL (2015) The magnitude and spatial patterns of future hydrologic change in California’s watersheds. Ecosphere 6:art 24. 10.1890/ES14-00300.1
- USDA (2015) U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed 24 Mar 2015
- Vicente-Serrano SM, Gouveia C, Camarero JJ, Begueria S, Trigo R, Lopez-Moreno JI, Azorin-Molina C, Pasho E, Lorenzo-Lacruz J, Revuelto J, Moran-Tejeda E, Sanchez-Lorenzo A (2013) Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:52–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Weiss SB, Flint L, Flint A, Micheli L (in review) Choosing your futures: high resolution climate-hydrology scenarios for San Francisco Bay Area, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Western Regional Climate Center (2015) Desert Research Institute. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/. Accessed 21 Jan 2015