Different bat guilds perceive their habitat in different ways: a multiscale landscape approach for variable selection in species distribution modelling
- 552 Downloads
Unveiling the scale at which organisms respond to habitat features is crucial to understand how they are influenced by anthropogenic environmental changes. We implemented species distribution models (SDMs) based on multiple-scale landscape pattern analysis for four bat species representative of different foraging guilds: Nyctalus leisleri, Rhinolophus hipposideros, Myotis emarginatus and Pipistrellus pipistrellus.
(a) to assess the environmental factors and the influence of scale on the habitat suitability of bats; (b) to develop an objective methodology to select the best performing variables from a large variable dataset.
We performed the study in central Italy (Tuscany): 381 variables were derived from topographical and habitat maps using a moving windows analysis set at three spatial scales (1, 5 and 10 km) that are ecologically meaningful for bats. For each species, we ran 381 univariate models to select the variables for multivariate SDMs.
All the variables retained in the SDMs described spatial pattern indices underlining the importance of landscape structure for species distribution. Species reacted differently in terms of both scale and landscape pattern. P. pipistrellus only responded to variables at 10 km; N. leisleri and M. emarginatus did so at two scales (5 and 10 km); whereas R. hipposideros also responded to variables at 1 km.
Our findings make it possible to tailor SDMs according to species-specific landscape pattern requirements at appropriate scales. Our approach, which can be easily extended to other taxa and different spatial scales, represents a significant step towards more effective land management planning.
KeywordsChiroptera Foraging Landscape pattern Multiscale approach Moving windows, Spatial scale
We thank NEMO s.r.l. for providing the CLC map. We also acknowledge Filippo Frizzi for his support in providing the topographic maps. Thanks also go to Stefano Vanni for his support in georeferencing the presence data.
- Agnelli P, Castelli C, Ducci L, Foggi B, Frizzi F, Giunti M, Guidi T, Puglisi L, Santini G, Vanni S, (2014) Elaborazioni analitiche a supporto della Rete Ecologica Toscana. In Reti ecologiche e paesaggio per il governo del territorio in Toscana (a cura di Falqui e Paolinelli). Collana Paesaggio, ISPRA, ETS PisaGoogle Scholar
- Baddeley A, Turner R (2012). Package ‘spatstat’. http://www.spatstat.org
- Battersby J (2010) Guidelines for surveillance, monitoring of European bats. EUROBATS Publication series No. 5. UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat, Bonn, p 95Google Scholar
- Booth GD, Niccolucci MJ, Schuster EG (1994) Identifying proxy sets in multiple linear regression: an aid to better coefficient interpretation Research Paper INT-470n. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service), OgdenGoogle Scholar
- Dietz C, Von Helversen O (2004) Illustrated identification key to the bats of Europe. Eur Bat Res Symp 1:11–157Google Scholar
- Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, García Marquéz J, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne P, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elith J, Graham CH, Person RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, McC Overton J, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Karen Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goiti U, Aihartza J, Guiu M, Salsamendi E, Almenar D, Napal M, Garin I (2011) Geoffroy’s bat, Myotis emarginatus, preys preferentially on spiders in multistratified dense habitats: a study of foraging bats in the Mediterranean. Folia Zool 60(1):17–24Google Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman S, Reagan C (2005) Quantifying terrestrial habitat loss and fragmentation: a protocol; USDA general technical report. Golden, USDA, Rocky Mountain RegionGoogle Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) “FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps.”. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
- Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill R, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Wade TG and Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 5:815–822Google Scholar
- Rodrigues L, Bach L, Duborg-Savage MJ, Goodwin J and Harbusch C (2008) Guidelines for consideration of bats in wind farm projects. EUROBATS Publication Series No. 3 (English version). UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat, BonnGoogle Scholar
- Roscioni F, Rebelo H, Russo D, Carranza ML, Di Febbraro M, Loy A (2014) A modelling approach to infer the effects of wind farms on landscape connectivity for bats. Landscape Ecol 29(5):891–903Google Scholar
- Russ J (1999) The Bats of Britain, Ireland. Echolocation calls, sound analysis, species identification. Alana Books, Alana Ecology LTD, QuezonGoogle Scholar
- Russo D (2007) Effects of land abandonment on animal species in Europe: conservation and management implications. Integrated Assessment of vulnerable ecosystems under global change in the European Union. European commission, directorate–general for research environment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, p 53Google Scholar
- Sánchez MC, Cushman SA, Saura S (2013) Scale dependence in habitat selection: the case of the endangered brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Cantabrian Range (NW Spain). Int J Geogr Inf Sci 28(8):1–16Google Scholar
- Shirk AJ (2012) Scale dependency of American marten (Martes americana) habitat relationships. Biology and conservation of martens, sables, and fishers: a new synthesis. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Vicente JR, Fernandes RF, Randin CF, Broennimann O, Gonçalves J, Marcos B, Pôças I, Alves P, Guisan A, Honrado JP (2013) Will climate change drive alien invasive plants into areas of high protection value? An improved model-based regional assessment to prioritise the management of invasions. J Environ Manag 131:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wasserman TN, Cushman SA, Do W, Hayden J (2012) Multi scale habitat relationships of Martes americana in northern Idaho, USA. Research Paper RMRS-RP-94. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p 21Google Scholar
- Wickham JD, Riitters KH, Wade TG, Homer C (2008) Temporal change in fragmentation of continental US forests. Landscape Ecol 23(8):891–898Google Scholar