Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 181–186 | Cite as

Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: An introduction

  • Louis Iverson
  • Cristian Echeverria
  • Laura Nahuelhual
  • Sandra Luque


The concept of ecosystem services from landscapes is rapidly gaining momentum as a language to communicate values and benefits to scientists and lay alike. Landscape ecology has an enormous contribution to make to this field, and one could argue, uniquely so. Tools developed or adapted for landscape ecology are being increasingly used to assist with the quantification, modelling, mapping, and valuing of ecosystem services. Several of these tools and methods encased therein are described among the eleven papers presented in this special issue, and their application has the potential to facilitate the management and promotion of services within ecosystems. Papers are associated with each of the four key categories of services that ecosystems provide to humans: supporting, provisioning, regulating, and cultural. The papers represent work conducted in eleven different countries, especially from South America. Each carries a unique approach to address a particular question pertaining to a particular set of ecosystem services. These studies are designed to inform and improve the economic, environmental and social values of the ecosystem services. This knowledge should help to develop new management alternatives for sustaining and planning ecosystems and the services they provide at different scales in space and time. We believe that these papers will create interest and inform management of some potential methods to evaluate ecosystem services at the landscape level with an integrative approach, offering new tools for management and conservation.


Landscape ecology Ecosystem services Provisioning Supporting Regulating Cultural South America Planning IUFRO-LE 



This special issue emerged from two conferences as mentioned in the text, in which the co-guest editors were involved as organizers. We thank the many people who organized, presented, or attended these conferences, as they provided many stimulating discussions and presentations. We thank the many reviewers who volunteered their time to review the articles in this special issue. We also thank the enthusiasm and continuing support from the IUFRO, IALE and ELI communities that make these outcomes possible. We especially want to thank the authors for their time and patience to participate in this volume. Thanks also to Stephen Matthews and Richard Birdsey for reviews of this paper.


  1. Ciccarese L, Mattsson A, Pettenella D (2012) Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. N For 43(5–6):543–560Google Scholar
  2. Donoso PJ, Frêne C, Flores M, Moorman MC, Oyarzún CE, Zavaleta JC (2014) Balancing water supply and old-growth forest conservation in the lowlands of southcentral Chile through adaptive co-management. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9969-7 Google Scholar
  3. Feld CK, da Silva PM, Sousa JP, de Bello F, Bugter R, Grandin U, Hering D, Lavorel S, Mountford O, Pardo I, Partel M, Rombke J, Sandin L, Jones KB, Harrison P (2009) Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos 118(12):1862–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferraz SFB, Ferraz KMPMB, Cassiano CC, Brancalion PHS, Luz D, Azevedo TN, Tambosi L, Metzger JP (2014) How good are tropical forest patches for ecosystem services provisioning?. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-9988-z
  5. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grêt-Regamey A, Rabe S-E, Crespo RA, Lautenbach S, Ryffel A, Schlup B (2014) On the importance of non-linear relationships between landscape patterns and the sustainable provision of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9957-y Google Scholar
  7. Grimaldi M, Oszwald J, Dolédec S, Hurtado MP, Miranda IS, de Sartre XA, de Assis WS, Castañeda E, Desjardins T, Dubs F, Guevara E, Gond V, Lima TTS, Marichal R, Michelotti F, Mitja D, Noronha NC, Oliveira MND, Ramirez B, Rodriguez G, Sarrazin M, da Silva Jr ML (2014) Ecosystem services of regulation and support in Amazonian pioneer fronts: searching for landscape drivers. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9981-y Google Scholar
  8. Helfenstein J, Kienast F (2014) Ecosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: a rapid assessment. Ecol Indic 36:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang Q, Robinson D, Parker DC (2014) Quantifying spatial-temporal change in land-cover among exurban residential parcels. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9963-0 Google Scholar
  10. Jones KB, Zurlini G, Kienast F, Petrosillo I, Edwards T, Wade T, Li B-I, Zaccarelli N (2013) Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecol 28(6):1175–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar P (2012) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Levin S (2012) The challenge of sustainability: lessons from an evolutionary perspective. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer, New York, pp 431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009) Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecol Soc 14(1):44Google Scholar
  14. Mastrangelo M, Weyland F, Villarino SH, Barral MP, Nahuelhual L, Laterra P (2014) Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9 Google Scholar
  15. Matthews S, Iverson LR, Peters M, Prasad A, Subburayalu S (2014) Assessing and comparing risk to climate changes among forested locations: implications for ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9965-y Google Scholar
  16. McIntyre N, Iverson L, Turner M (2013) A 27-year perspective on landscape ecology from the US-IALE annual meeting. Landscape Ecol 28:1845–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Musacchio L (2013) Key concepts and research priorities for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 28(6):995–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Aguayo M, Echeverria C (2014) Land use change and ecosystem services provision: a case study of recreation and ecotourism opportunities in southern Chile. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9958-x Google Scholar
  20. Opdam P, Nassauer J, Wang Z, Albert C, Bentrup G, Castella J-C, McAlpine C, Liu J, Sheppard S, Swaffield S (2013) Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landscape Ecol 28(8):1439–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2013) Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 28(6):1053–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Risser PG, Iverson LR (2013) 30 years later—landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Landscape Ecol 28(3):367–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santos de Lima L, Coe MT, Soares-Filho BS, Cuadra SV, Pinto Dias LC, Costa MH, Santos de Lima L, Rodrigues HO (2014) Feedbacks between deforestation, climate, and hydrology in the Southwestern Amazon: implications for the provision of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9962-1 Google Scholar
  24. Schindler S, Sebesvari Z, Damm C, Euller K, Mauerhofer V, Hermann A, Biró M, Essl F, Kanka R, Lauwaars S, Schulz-Zunkel C, van der Sluis T, Kropik M, Gasso V, Krug A, Pusch M, Zulka KP, Lazowski W, Hainz-Renetzeder C, Henle K, Wrbka T (2014) Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: relating management options to ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1186/2047-2382-2-10 Google Scholar
  25. Shackelford N, Hobbs RJ, Burgar JM, Erickson TE, Fontaine JB, Laliberte E, Ramalho CE, Perring MP, Standish RJ (2013) Primed for change: developing ecological restoration for the 21st Century. Restor Ecol 21(3):297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ten Brink P (2011) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. Earthscan, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86:1967–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner M, Donato D, Romme W (2013) Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: priorities for future research. Landscape Ecol 28(6):1081–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uuemaa E, Mander U, Marja R (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecol Indicators 28:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vanacker V, Bellin N, Molina A, Kubik PW (2014) Erosion regulation as function of human disturbances in vegetation cover: A conceptual model. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9956-z Google Scholar
  32. Wiens JA (2013) Is landscape sustainability a useful concept in a changing world? Landscape Ecol 28(6):1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu J (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28(6):999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Iverson
    • 1
  • Cristian Echeverria
    • 2
  • Laura Nahuelhual
    • 3
    • 4
  • Sandra Luque
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.US Forest ServiceDelawareUSA
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecología de Paisaje, Facultad de Ciencias ForestalesUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  3. 3.Instituto de Economía AgrariaUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  4. 4.Center for Climate and Resilience ResearchUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  5. 5.IRSTEA, National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and AgricultureClermont-FerrandFrance
  6. 6.Department of Geography and Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of St AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations