Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 1463–1479 | Cite as

Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance

  • Olaf Bastian
  • Karsten Grunewald
  • Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
  • Ulrich Walz
  • Wolfgang Wende
Perspective

Abstract

Recently, in addition to the popular concept of “ecosystem services” (ES), the term “landscape services” (LS) has come into use. We are examining the question of whether a stronger focus on LS would be useful, particularly with regard to case studies carried out in Germany. Important reasons for introducing the term LS include the prominent role of spatial aspects, the reference to landscape elements and the landscape character, and the relevance of LS for landscape planning. We found no strong arguments for replacing the concept of ES by LS; however, we do prefer a situation-related use of both concepts. We propose the following definition: Landscape services are the contributions of landscapes and landscape elements to human well-being.

Keywords

Landscape elements Landscape character Spatial reference units Landscape planning and management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers and the editor, Prof. J. Wu, for their helpful comments and comprehensive advices, but also Mr. Phil Hill, Berlin, for polishing the language.

References

  1. Albert C, von Haaren C, Galler C (2012) Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen oder ein Impuls für die Landschaftsplanung? Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 44:142–148Google Scholar
  2. Antrop M (2000) Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecol 15:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baja S, Chapman DM, Dragovich D (2002) A conceptual model for defining and assessing land management units using a fuzzy modeling approach in GIS environment. Environ Manag 29:647–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastian O (2008) Landscape classification: between fact and fiction. In: Lechnio J, Kulczyk S, Malinowska E, Szumacher I (eds) Landscape classification. Theory and practice. Warsaw University, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  5. Bastian O, Krönert R, Lipský Z (2006a) Landscape diagnosis in different space and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol 21:359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastian O, Lütz M, Röder M, Syrbe R-U (2006b) The assessment of landscape scenarios with regard to landscape functions. In: Meyer BC (ed) Sustainable land use in intensively used agricultural regions. Landscape Europe. Alterra Rep. No. 1338, Wageningen, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  7. Bastian O, Grunewald K, Syrbe R-U (2012a) Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(1–2):5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K (2012b) Ecosystem properties, potentials and services—the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic 21:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bastian O, Lupp G, Syrbe R-U, Steinhäußer S (2013a) Ecosystem services and energy crops—spatial differentiation of risks. Ekológia Bratislava 32:13–29Google Scholar
  10. Bastian O, Walz U, Decker A (2013b) Historical landscape elements: part of our cultural heritage—a methodological study from Saxony. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyzga B (eds) Integrating nature and society towards sustainability. Environmental Science and Engineering, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 441–460Google Scholar
  11. Blaschke T (2006) The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urb Plan 75:198–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botequilha Leitão A, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes: a planner’s handbook. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Burggraaff P, Kleefeld K-D (1998) Historische Kulturlandschaft und Kulturlandschaftselemente. Angewandte Landschaftsökologie 20:320Google Scholar
  14. Burkhard BF, Müller F, Windhorst W (2009) Landscapes‘capacities to provide ecosystem services—a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc Online 15:1–22Google Scholar
  15. CBD—Convention on Biological Biodiversity (2010) Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. CBD Secretariat, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  16. Costanza R (2008) Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 141:350–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel TC (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21th century. Landsc Urb Plan 54:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Groot RS, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Environ Econ 41:393–408Google Scholar
  19. De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellenberg H (1973) Die Ökosysteme der Erde: Versuch einer Klassifikation der Ökosysteme nach funktionalen Gesichtspunkten. In: Ellenberg H (ed) Ökosystemforschung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson J, Gross K, Grove M, Hopkinson CS, Kahn J, Pincetl S, Troy A, Warren P, Wilson M (2006) Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morlin P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank S, Fürst C, Koschke L, Makeschin F (2012) A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grunewald K, Bastian O (2010) Ökosystemdienstleistungen analysieren—begrifflicher und konzeptioneller Rahmen aus landschaftsökologischer Sicht. Geo-Öko 31:50–82Google Scholar
  25. Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) (2013) Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Konzept, Methoden und Fallbeispiele. Springer-Spektrum, Heidelberg Berlin (English edition: Ecosystem services. 2014)Google Scholar
  26. Grunewald K, Syrbe R-U, Renner C (2012) Analyse der ästhetischen und monetären Wertschätzung der Landschaft am Erzgebirgskamm durch den Tourismus. Geo-Öko 33:34–65Google Scholar
  27. Grunewald K, Syrbe R-U, Bastian O (2014) Costs of landscape management measures as indicators of the value of ecosystem services—as exemplified by the Landscape Management Strategy of Saxony. Ecol Indic 37(A):241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunzelmann T (1987) Die Erhaltung der historischen Kulturlandschaft. Angewandte historische Geographie des ländlichen Raumes mit Beispielen aus Franken. Bamberger Wirtschaftsgeogr. Arbeiten 4, Bamberg, pp 318Google Scholar
  29. Haase G, Mannsfeld K (eds)(2002) Naturraumeinheiten, Landschaftsfunktionen und Leitbilder am Beispiel von Sachsen. Forschungen zur deutschen Landeskunde 250, FlensburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heinz Center–The H. John Heinz (III) Center for Science, Economics and the Environment (2008) Landscape pattern indicators for the nation: a report from the Heinz Center’s landscape pattern task group, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodder KH, Newton AC, Cantarello E, Perrella L (2014) Does landscape-scale conservation management enhance the provision of ecosystem services? Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 10(1):71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jedicke E (ed) (1996) Praktische Landschaftspflege—Grundlagen und Maßnahmen, 2nd edn. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  34. Kienast F (2010) Landschaftsdienstleistungen: ein taugliches Konzept für Forschung und Praxis? Forum für Wissen, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  35. Kirchhoff T, Trepl L, Vicenzotti V (2012) What is landscape ecology? An analysis and evaluation of six different conceptions. Landsc Res 38(1):33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lang S, Walz U, Klug H, Blaschke T, Syrbe R-U (2009) Landscape metrics—a toolbox for assessing past, present and future landscape structure. In: Bender O, Evelpido N, Krek A, Vassilopoulos A (eds) Geoinformation technologies for geocultural landscapes. European Perspectives, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 207–234Google Scholar
  37. Leibenath M, Gailing L (2012) Semantische Annäherung an die Worte „Landschaft“und „Kulturlandschaft“. In: Schenk W, Kühn M, Leibenath M, Tzschaschel S (eds) Suburbane Räume als Kulturlandschaften. Verlag der ARL, Hannover, pp 58–79Google Scholar
  38. Leser H (1997) Landschaftsökologie. 4th ed, UTB, Ulmer, Stuttgart (1st ed 1976)Google Scholar
  39. Lupp G, Albrecht J, Darbi M, Bastian O (2011) Ecosystem services in energy crop production—a concept for regulatory measures in spatial planning? J Landscape Ecol 4:49–66Google Scholar
  40. Lupp G, Syrbe R-U, Steinhäußer R, Bastian O (2014) Perception of energy crops by laypersons and farmers using the approach of ecosystem services. Moravian Geogr RepGoogle Scholar
  41. Lütz M, Bastian O (2002) Implementation of landscape planning and nature conservation in the agricultural landscape—a case study from Saxony. Agric Ecosyst Environ 92:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MEA—Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Müller F, de Groot R, Willemen L (2010) Ecosystem services at the landscape scale: the need for integrative approaches. Landsc Online 23:1–11Google Scholar
  44. Neef E (1976) Nebenwirkungen der gesellschaftlichen Tätigkeiten im Naturraum. Petermanns Geogr Mitt 120:141–144Google Scholar
  45. Palang H, Printsmann A, Konkoly Gyuro E, Urbanc M, Skowronek E, Woloszyn W (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol 21:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plieninger T, Bieling C, Gerdes H, Ohnesorge B, Schaich H, Schleyer C, Trommler K, Wolff F (2010) Ökosystemdienstleistungen in Kulturlandschaften. Konzept und Anwendung am Beispiel der Biosphärenreservate Oberlausitz und Schwäbische Alb. Natur und Landschaft 85:187–192Google Scholar
  47. Polasky S, Nelson E, Camm J, Csuti B, Fackler B, Lonsdorf E, Montgomery C, White D, Arthur J, Garber-Yonts B, Haight R, Kagan J, Starfield A, Tobalske C (2008) Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol Conserv 141:1505–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ring I, Hansjürgens B, Elmqvist T, Wittmer H, Sukhdev P (2010) Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. ScienceDirect. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenberg M, Syrbe R-U, Vowinckel J, Walz U (2014) Scenario methodology for modelling of future landscape developments as basis for assessing ecosystem services. Landsc Online 33:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schaich H, Bieling C, Plieninger T (2010) Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia 19:269–277Google Scholar
  51. Syrbe R-U, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tengberg A, Fredholm S, Eliasson I, Knez I, Saltzman K, Wetterberg O (2012) Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity Ecosyst Serv 2:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Countryside Agency + Scottish Natural Heritage (2002) Landscape character assessment: guidance for England and Scotland. Sheffield, pp 84Google Scholar
  55. Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc Res 31:229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, Marja R, Mander Ü (2009) Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev Landsc Res 3:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Harrison PA, Luck GW, Berry P, Bugter R, Dawson TP, Feld CK, Harrington R, Haslett JR, Hering D, Jones KB, Jongman R, Lavorel S, Martins da Silva P, Moora M, Paterson J, Rounsevell MDA, Sandin L, Settele J, Sousa JP, Zobel M (2008) Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. RUBICODE Deliverable D2.1. Available from http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_e-conference_report.pdf. Accessed Dec 2013
  58. von Haaren C (ed) (2004) Landschaftsplanung. UTB, Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  59. Walz U (2008) Monitoring of landscape change and functions in Saxony (Eastern Germany)—methods and indicators. Ecol Indic 8:807–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walz U (2011) Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Rev Landsc Res 5:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walz U, Ueberfuhr F, Schauer P, Halke E (2010) Ableitung und Bewertung von Kulturlandschaftsgebieten für das Landschaftsprogramm Sachsen. Natur und Landschaft 85:17–23Google Scholar
  62. Wascher DM (ed)(2005) European landscape character areas—typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Alterra Report 1254, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  63. Wende W, Wojtkiewicz W, Marschall I, Heiland S, Lipp T, Reinke M, Schaal P, Schmidt C (2012) Putting the plan into practice: implementation of proposals for measures of local landscape plans. Landsc Res 37:483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Willemen L (2010) Mapping and modeling multifunctional landscapes. PhD thesis, University of Wageningen, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  65. Willemen L, Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Hein L, Leemans R (2012) A multi-scape modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics. J Environ Manag 100:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu JG (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28:999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf Bastian
    • 1
  • Karsten Grunewald
    • 1
  • Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
    • 1
  • Ulrich Walz
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Wende
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional DevelopmentDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations