Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1025–1038 | Cite as

Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services

  • Laura R. Musacchio
Research article

Abstract

Landscape ecological research about the cultural dimension of ecosystem services remains less developed as compared to other aspects of ecosystem services about landscapes. In this article, the cultural dimension of ecosystem services is defined as the psychological, cultural, and social relationships that influence people’s connections to biodiversity and landscapes as well as to what benefits they consider useful and relevant. Yet to meet the challenge of understanding sustainability in different landscapes, such as urban ones, research about ecosystem services in landscape ecology will need to shift its emphasis towards the scale of people’s experience of landscapes. As a means to improve this situation, cultivating deep care is proposed as a key concept to better integrate the cultural dimension of ecosystem services into landscape ecological research about urban landscapes. Cultivating deep care is defined as the adaptive process for deepening people’s affinity of urban nature including enhancing people’s appreciation, awareness, and actions for biodiversity, landscapes, and their own well-being that will ultimately benefit ecosystem services. The heart of this article is a conceptual framework that begins to outline the scope and boundaries of cultivating deep care as a key concept and connects it to its intellectual context that includes research such as landscape sustainability, landscape perception, resilience science, and ecosystem services. An important assumption is that cultivating deep care is a “work in progress,” which will grow and evolve over time as new knowledge is contributed to it. In the conceptual framework, several principles explore and flesh important ideas and relationships about cultivating deep care as a key concept. Each principle is organized around three parts: (1) a brief description; (2) relevance to landscape ecological research; and (3) recommended research topics. Using these principles, I suggest potential avenues to advance landscape ecological research about biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being.

Keywords

Ecosystem services Landscape sustainability Urban landscapes Biodiversity Landscape perception Human well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I want to thank all of the reviewers who provided constructive feedback on draft of this manuscript. In addition, I am grateful for the financial support for these activities that was provided by the Institute on the Environment, College of Design, and Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Minnesota.

References

  1. Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in a new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100:341–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern J (2013) Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc EcolGoogle Scholar
  3. Aker A, Barton J, Cossey R, Gainsford P, Griffin M, Micklewright D (2012) Visual color perception in green exercise: positive effects on mood and perceived exertion. Environ Sci Technol 46:8661–8666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthel S, Folke C, Colding J (2010) Social-ecological memory in urban gardens-retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change 20:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton J, Pretty J (2010) What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol 44:3947–3955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagwat SA (2009) Ecosystem services and sacred natural sites: reconciling material and non-material in nature conservation. Environ Values 18:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch AM, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards M, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC (2012) Toward principles for enhancing resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buijs AE, Fischer A, Rink D, Young JC (2008) Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: understanding public representations of biodiversity. Int J Biodiversity Sci Manag 4:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan KMA, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern BS, Hannahs N, Levine J, Norton B, Ruckelshaus M, Russell R, Tam J, Woodside U (2012a) Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62:744–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012b) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1737–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton S, Myers G (2009) Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. John Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Colding J (2007) ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colding J, Barthel S (2013) The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities. Ecol Econ 86:156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2007) The beginning of a new invasive plant: a history of the ornamental callery pear in the United States. Bioscience 57:956–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landsc Ecol 26:899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cumming S, Olsson P, Chapin III, Holling CS (2013) Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landsc EcolGoogle Scholar
  18. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Roquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth RP, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8812–8819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean J, van Dooren K, Weinstien P (2011) Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings? Med Hypotheses 76:877–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. del Tredici P (2010) Wild urban plants of the Northeast: a field guide. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  23. Dictionary.com (2013) Definition of adapt. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adapt?s=t. Accessed 1 June 2013
  24. Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 99:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunnett N, Nagase A, Hallam A (2008) The dynamics of planted and colonizing species on a green roof over six growing seasons 2001–2006: influence of substrate depth. Urban Ecosyst 11:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ernstson H, van der Leeuw S, Redman CL, Meffert DJ, Davis G, Alfsen C, Elmqvist T (2010) Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39:531–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Felson AJ, Pickett STA (2005) Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer A, Young JC (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer A, Langers F, Bednar-Friedl B, Geamana N, Skogen K (2011) Mental representations of animal and plant species in their social contexts: results from a survey in Europe. J Environ Psychol 31:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Francis RA, Lorimer J (2011) Urban reconciliation ecology: the potential of living roofs and walls. J Environ Manage 92:1429–1437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman C, Dickinson JM, Porter S, van Heezik Y (2012) “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. J Environ Psychol 32:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaffin SR, Khanbilvardi R, Rosenzweig C (2009) Development of a green roof environmental monitoring and meteorological network in New York City. Sensors 9:2647–2660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Garibaldi A, Turner N (2004) Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecol Soc 9(3):1 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1/ Google Scholar
  36. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22:959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Environ 25:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (In press 2012) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273Google Scholar
  39. Gos P, Lavorel S (2012) Stakeholders’ expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity. Int J Biodiversity Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojimas D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Montserrat V, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7Google Scholar
  42. Hodgson SM, Maltby L, Paetzold A, Phillips D (2007) Getting a measure of nature: cultures and values in an ecosystem services approach. Interdisc Sci Rev 32:249–262Google Scholar
  43. Hofmann M, Westermann JR, Kowarik I, van der Meer E (2012) Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban For Urban Green 11:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Isabell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, Connolly J, Harpole WS, Reich PB, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Tilman D, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Wilsey BJ, Zavaleta ES, Loreau M (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johansson M, Rahm J, Gyllin M (2012) Landowners’ participation in biodiversity conservation examined through the value-belief-norm theory. Landsc Res. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2012.673576 Google Scholar
  46. Joye Y (2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev Gen Psychol 11:305–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Junge X, Jacot KA, Bosshard A, Lindemann-Matthies P (2009) Swiss people’s attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. J Nat Conserv 17:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaiser FG (2006) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Pers Individ Differ 41:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav 33:507–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1995) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Knight KS, Kurylo JS, Endress AG, Stewart JR, Reich RB (2007) Ecology and ecosystem impacts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica): a review. Biol Invasion 9:925–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Korpela KM, Ylén M (2007) Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favourite places in the vicinity. Health Place 13:138–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Korpela KM, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H (2008) Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health Place 14:636–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Korpela KM, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H (2010) Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promot Int 25:200–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kumar M, Kumar P (2008) Valuation of the ecosystems services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 64:808–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S (2011) Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change 11:791–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leichenko R (2011) Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis CA (1996) Green nature/human nature: the meaning of plants in our lives. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindemann-Matthies P (2005) ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: how children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhance through observation of nature. Int J Sci Educ 27:655–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E (2007) Species richness, structural diversity and species composition in meadows created by visitors of a botanical garden in Switzerland. Landsc Urban Plan 29:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindemann-Matthies P, Junge X, Matthies D (2010) The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biol Conserv 143:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lister NM (2007) Sustainable large parks: ecological design or designer ecology? In: Czerniak J, Hargreaves G (eds) Large parks. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, pp 35–57Google Scholar
  64. Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods. Algonquin Books, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  65. Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations of urban bird and plant communities to human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 4:816–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lyytimäki J, Petersen LK, Normander B, Bezák P (2008) Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ Sci 5:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mårtensson F, Boldemann C, Söderström M, Blennow M, Englund JE, Grahn P (2009) Outdoor environment assessment of attention promoting settings for preschool children. Health Place 15:1149–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, García Del Amo D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA, Santos-Martin F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago Montes C (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7:e38970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meyer M (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun 32:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  72. Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Environ 20:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai Y, Nakashima T, Ohira H, Shirakawa T (2007) Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: shinrin-yoku (forest-air breathing, walking) as a possible methods for stress reduction. Public Health 121:54–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Musacchio L (2009) The scientific basis for design for landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landsc Ecol 24:993–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Musacchio L (2011) The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landsc Ecol 26:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc Ecol 23:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Opdam P (2013) Using ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: science is not ready to deliver. In: Fu B, Jones KB (eds) Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture. Springer, New York, pp 77–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pollan M (2001) The botany of desire: a plant’s eye view of the world. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Pouta E, Rekola M (2001) The theory of planned behavior in predicting the willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Soc Nat Resour 14:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pyle RM (1978) The extinction of experience. Horticulture 56:64–67Google Scholar
  83. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010a) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald GK, Pfeifer L (2010b) Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60:576–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Resilience Alliance (2013) Adaptive capacity. http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/adaptive_capacity. Accessed 31 May 2013
  86. Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology: how the Earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  87. Rowe DB (2011) Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environ Pollut 159:2100–2110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 20:702–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Science Dictionary (2013) Definition of adaption. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adaption?s=t. Accessed 1 June 2013
  90. Snep R, Van Ierland E, Opdam P (2009) Enhancing biodiversity at business sites: what are the options, and which of these do stakeholders prefer? Landsc Urban Plan 91:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Soliva R, Hunizker M (2009) How do biodiversity and conservation values relate to landscape preferences? A case study from the Swiss Alps. Biodiversity Conserv 9:2483–2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tidball KG (2012) Urgent biophilia: human-nature interactions and biological attractions in disaster resilience. Ecology and Society 17(2):5 [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04596-170205
  94. Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. van den Berg AE, Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2010) Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc Sci Med 70:1203–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban For Urban Green 6:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  99. World English Dictionary (2013a) Definition of adaption. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adaption?s=t Accessed 1 June 2013
  100. World English Dictionary (2013b) Definition of capacity http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/capacity?s=t Accessed 2 June 2013
  101. Wu J (2010) Landscape of culture and culture of landscape: does landscape ecology need culture? Landsc Ecol 25:1147–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wu J (2013a) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landsc Ecol 28:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wu J (2013b) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc EcolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations