Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 271–283 | Cite as

Landscape configuration and urban heat island effects: assessing the relationship between landscape characteristics and land surface temperature in Phoenix, Arizona

  • John Patrick Connors
  • Christopher S. Galletti
  • Winston T. L. Chow
Research Article

Abstract

The structure of urban environments is known to alter local climate, in part due to changes in land cover. A growing subset of research focuses specifically on the UHI in terms of land surface temperature by using data from remote sensing platforms. Past research has established a clear relationship between land surface temperature and the proportional area of land covers, but less research has specifically examined the effects of the spatial patterns of these covers. This research considers the rapidly growing City of Phoenix, Arizona in the United States. To better understand how landscape structure affects local climate, we explored the relationship between land surface temperature and spatial pattern for three different land uses: mesic residential, xeric residential, and industrial/commercial. We used high-resolution (2.4 m) land cover data and an ASTER temperature product to examine 90 randomly selected sample sites of 240 square-meters. We (1) quantify several landscape-level and class-level landscape metrics for the sample sites, (2) measure the Pearson correlation coefficients between land surface temperature and each landscape metric, (3) conduct an analysis of variance among the three land uses, and (4) model the determinants of land surface temperature using ordinary least squares linear regression. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients reveal significant relationships between several measures of spatial configuration and LST, but these relationships differ among the land uses. The ANOVA confirmed that mean land surface temperature and spatial patterns differed among the three land uses. Although a relationship was apparent between surface temperatures and spatial pattern, the results of the linear regression indicate that proportional land cover of grass and impervious surfaces alone best explains temperature in mesic residential areas. In contrast, temperatures in industrial/commercial areas are explained by changes in the configuration of grass and impervious surfaces.

Keywords

ASTER Quickbird Remote sensing CAP-LTER Urban temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank B. L. Turner II and Anthony Brazel for comments, and Shai Kaplan for his work on classifying the Quickbird image. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. BCS-1026865 (CAP-LTER) and the Gilbert F. White Professorship, and was carried out in the Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Lab of the Global Institute of Sustainability and the School of Geographical Science and Urban Planning, ASU. WTLC’s research is funded by a NSF Earth Systems Models (EaSM) Program award 1049251.

References

  1. Anselin L (2003) Geoda 0.9 User’s HandbookGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker LA, Brazel AJ, Westerhoff P (2004) Environmental consequences of rapid urbanization in warm, arid lands: case study of Phoenix, Arizona (USA). In: Marchettini N, Brebbia C, Tiezzi E, Wadhwa LC (eds) The sustainable city III, (Proceedings of the Sienna Conference, held June 2004), Advances in Architecture Series, WIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker F (1987) The impact of spectral emissivity on the measurement of land surface temperature from a satellite. Int J Remote Sens 8:1509–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brazel A, Selover N, Vose R, Heisler G (2000) The tale of two climates—Baltimore and Phoenix urban LTER sites. Climate Res 15:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brazel A, Gober P, Lee S-J, Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder J, Hedquist B, Comparri E (2007) Determinants of changes in the regional urban heat island in metropolitan Phoenix (Arizona, USA) between 1990 and 2004. Climate Res 33:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2010) Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Landscape Ecol 25(1):17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao X, Onishi A, Chen J, Imura H (2010) Quantifying the cool island intensity of urban parks using ASTER and IKONOS data. Landsc Urban Plan 96:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chow WTL, Chuang WC, Gober P (2012) Vulnerability to extreme heat in metropolitan Phoenix: spatial, temporal, and demographic dimensions. Prof Geogr 64:286–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Georgescu M, Miguez-Macho G, Steyaert LT, Weaver CP (2009) Climatic effects of 30 years of landscape change over the greater Phoenix, Arizona, region: 1. Surface energy budget changes. J Geophys Res 114:D05110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillespie A, Rokugawa S, Matsunaga T, Cothern JS, Hook S, Kahle AB (1998) A temperature and emissivity separation algorithm for advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) images. IEEE T Geosci Remote 36:1113–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gober P (2006) Metropolitan Phoenix: place making and community building in the desert. University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gober P, Wentz EA, Lant T, Tschudi MK, Kirkwood CW (2011) WaterSim: a simulation model for urban water planning in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Environ Plann B 38:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goward SN, Cruickshanks GD, Hope AS (1985) Observed relation between thermal emission and reflected spectral radiance of a complex vegetated landscape. Remote Sens Environ 18:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grimm NB, Redman CL (2004) Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: the case of central Arizona–Phoenix. Urb Ecosyst 7:199–213Google Scholar
  15. Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harlan SL, Brazel A, Prashad L, Stefanov W, Larsen L (2006) Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Soc Sci Med 63:2847–2863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Brazel A, Jones N, Larsen L, Stefanov WL (2007) Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 22:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin MS (2012) Developing an index to measure urban heat island effect using satellite land skin temperature and land cover observation. J Clim 25:6193–6201Google Scholar
  19. Kalkstein LS, Smoyer KE (1993) Human biometeorology—the impact of climate-change on human health—some international implications. Experientia 49:969–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalnay E, Cai M (2003) Impact of urbanization and land-use on climate. Nature 423:528–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinney P, Shindell D, Chae E (2001) Climate change and public health: impact assessment for the NYC metropolitan region. In: Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD (eds) Climate change and a global city: an assessment of the metropolitan east coast region. Columbia Earth Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Klinenberg E (2002) Heat wave: a social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Knowles-Yanez K, Moritz C, Fry J, Redman CL, Bucchin M, McCartney PH (1999) Historic land use: phase I report on generalized land use. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research. Arizona State University, TempeGoogle Scholar
  24. Landsberg HE (1981) The urban climate. National Academy Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee S-M, Fernando HJS, Princevac M, Zajic D, Sinesi M, McCulley JL, Anderson J (2003) Transport and diffusion of ozone in the nocturnal and morning planetary boundary layer of the Phoenix valley. Environ Fluid Mech 3:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Zhou W, Ouyang Z, Xu W, Zheng H (2012) Spatial pattern of greenspace affects land surface temperature: evidence from the heavily urbanized Beijing metropolitan area, China. Landscape Ecol 27:887–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu H, Weng Q (2009) Scaling effect on the relationship between landscape pattern and land surface temperature: a case study of Indianapolis, United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75(3):291–304Google Scholar
  28. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Pacific North- west Research Station, USDA-Forest Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Nichol JE (1996) Fine resolution surface temperature patterns related to urban morphology in a tropical city: a satellite-based study. J Appl Meteorol 35:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Oke TR (1995) The heat island of the urban boundary layer: characteristics, causes and effects. In: Cermak JE (ed) Wind climate in cities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  32. Oke TR (2004) Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. IOM Report 81.TD, World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Quattrochi DA, Ridd MK (1994) Measurements and analysis of thermal energy responses from discrete urban surfaces using remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 15:1991–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quattrochi D, Luvall J, Rickman D, Estes M, Laymon C, Howell B (2000) A decision support information system for urban landscape management using thermal infrared data. Photogramm Eng Rem S 66:1195–1207Google Scholar
  35. Redman CL, Kinzig AP (2008) Water can flow uphill: a narrative of central Arizona. In: Redman CL, Foster D (eds) Agrarian landscapes in transition. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 238–271Google Scholar
  36. Redman CL, Hutchins J, Kunda R (2005) Land use classification 2000. http://caplter.asu.edu/data/. Accessed online August 2011
  37. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Parshall L, Chopping M, Pope G, Goldberg R (2005) Characterizing the urban heat island in current and future climates in New Jersey. Global Environ Change B 6:51–62Google Scholar
  38. Small C (2005) A global analysis of urban reflectance. Int J Remote Sens 26:661–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sens Environ 77:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner BL (2010) Sustainability and forest transitions in the Southern Yucatan: the land architecture approach. Land Use Policy 27:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. U.S. Census Bureau (2010) United States Census: 2010. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/. Accessed online 1 July 2011
  43. Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sens Environ 86:370–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weng Q (2003) Fractal analysis of satellite-detected urban heat island effect. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69(5):555–566Google Scholar
  45. Weng Q, Liu H, Liang B, Lu D (2008) The spatial variations of urban land surface temperatures: pertinent factors, zoning effect, and seasonal variability. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 1(2):154–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu J, Jenerette GD, Buyantuyev A, Redman CL (2011) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecol Complex 8:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. York AM, Shrestha M, Boone CG, Zhang S, Harrington JA, Prebyl TJ, Swann A, Agar M, Antolin MF, Nolen B, Wright JB, Skaggs R (2011) Land fragmentation under rapid urbanization: a cross-site analysis of Southwestern cities. Urban Ecosyst 14:429–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang X, Zhong T, Feng X, Wang K (2009) Estimation of the relationship between vegetation patches and urban land surface temperature with remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 30:2105–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhou W, Huang G, Cadenasso ML (2011) Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 102:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Patrick Connors
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher S. Galletti
    • 2
  • Winston T. L. Chow
    • 3
  1. 1.EcoSERVICES GroupArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.School of Geographical Sciences and Urban PlanningArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringArizona State UniversityMesaUSA

Personalised recommendations