Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning from the past to predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Norwegian wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus are divided into 23 virtually isolated populations, primarily due to the abandonment of traditional migration and movement corridors caused by the development of infrastructures. By conducting a nation-wide, interdisciplinary pre-post study on a temporal scale spanning centuries, we modelled current reindeer movements with respect to archaeological findings to quantify long-term changes in area use related to anthropogenic disturbance. The location of 3,113 pitfall traps and hunting blinds, built 600–2000 years ago and used until 350–400 years ago, testified the location of traditional movement corridors. Current movement routes were delineated using Brownian Bridge Movement Models based on 147 reindeer GPS-monitored during 10 years. Using Path Analysis we quantified direct, indirect and total effects of different infrastructures within multiple scales (1, 5, and 10 km-radius buffers) on the current probability of use of ancient movement corridors. Tourist cabins and roads had the strongest long-term direct effects at most scales: 1 tourist cabin and 1 km road within a 1 km-radius buffer would lead, respectively, to complete area abandonment, and to a 46 % decrease in the probability of use. Power lines and private cabins had significant indirect effects on area use through their effect on roads, while hiking trails and, in particular, hydroelectric dams had highly variable effects, not significant at a nation-wide scale. Finally, we provide a flexible tool to estimate the potential long-term direct and cumulative effects of different types of infrastructures at the desired spatial scale to be used for the development of future sustainable land management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts G, MacKenzie M, McConnell B, Fedak M, Matthiopoulos J (2008) Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography 31:140–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkestuen V, Erikstad L, Halvorsen R (2008) Step-less models for regional biogeoclimatic variation in Norway. J Biogeogr 35:1906–1922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Young JK, Berger KM (2008) Protecting migration corridors: Challenges and optimism for Mongolian saiga. PLoS Biol 6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060165

  • Bergman CM, Schaefer JA, Luttich SN (2000) Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 123(3):364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørneraas K, Herfindal I, Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, van Moorter B, Rolandsen CM (2010) Screening GPS location data for errors using animal movement characteristics. J Wildl Manag 74(6):1261–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Blehr O (1987) The need for ethnographical analogies in the study of prehistoric caribou/wild reindeer hunting: A case study from Sumtangen, Norway. In: Burenhult G, Carlsson A, Hyenstrand Å et al (eds) Theoretical approaches to artefacts, settlement and society. BAR International Series, Oxford, pp 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbin N, Fortin D, Dussault C, Courtois R (2009) Landscape management for woodland caribou: the protection of forest blocks influences wolf-caribou co-occurrence. Landscape Ecol 24(10):1375–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahle B, Reimers E, Colman JE (2008) Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) avoidance of a highway as revealed by lichen measurements. Eur J Wildl Res 54(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DNT (2012) Norwegian Trekking Association. http://www.turistforeningen.no/english. Accessed Jan 2012

  • Duchesne M, Côté SD, Barrette C (2000) Responses of woodland caribou to winter ecotourism in the Charlevoix Biosphere Reserve, Canada. Biol Conserv 96(3):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer SJ, O’Neill JP, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2002) Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80(5):839–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnell R (2009) Three decades of caribou recovery programs in Yukon: a paradigm shift in wildlife management. MRC-09-01. Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse. 18s

  • Ferguson MAD, Messier F (2000) Mass emigration of arctic tundra caribou from a traditional winter range: population dynamics and physical condition. J Wildl Manag 64:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A, Dill LM (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell J, Sinclair A (1988) Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends Ecol Evol 3(9):237–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Hebblewhite M, Loison A, Fuller M, Powell R, Basille M, Van Moorter B (2010) Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2255–2265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill JA, Norris K, Sutherland WJ (2001) Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance. Biol Conserv 97(2):265–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemoen RI, Reimers E (2002) Reindeer summer activity pattern in relation to weather and insect harassment. J Anim Ecol 71(5):883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris G, Thirgood S, Hopcraft JG (2009) Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger Species Res 7(1):55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2007) Multiscale wolf predation risk for elk: does migration reduce risk? Oecologia 152:377–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helle T, Särkelä M (1993) The effects of outdoor recreation on range use by semi-domesticated reindeer. Scand J For Res 8:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88:2354–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R (2005) Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. Wildl Monogr 160:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly K, Nellemann C, Vistnes I (2006) A reevaluation of caribou distribution near an oilfield road on Alaska’s north slope. Wildl Soc B 34(3):870–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordhøy P (2008) Ancient wild reindeer pitfall trapping systems as indicators for former migration patterns and habitat use in the Dovre region, southern Norway. Rangifer 28(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordhøy P, Binns KS, Støren SA (2005) Ancient wild reindeer hunting and trapping practices as indicators for former migration patterns, hunting organization and use of resources in the Dovre region. NINA Report 19, 72 pp

  • Leblond M, Frair J, Fortin D (2011) Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple spatial scales: an application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity. Landscape Ecol 26(10):1433–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Fritz MS, Williams J, Lockwood CM (2007) Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN. Behav Res Methods 39:384–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney SP, Schaefer JA (2002) Hydroelectric development and the disruption of migration in caribou. Biol Conserv 107(2):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallord JW, Dolman PM, Brown AF, Sutherland WJ (2007) Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground-nesting passerine. J Appl Ecol 44:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiopoulos J (2003) The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecol Model 159:239–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ (2006) Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Sage publication Inc., Thousand Oaks 722 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Jordhøy P, Støen O-G, Strand O (2000) Cumulative impacts of tourist resorts on wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) during winter. Arctic 53(1):9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P (2001) Winter distribution of wild reindeer in relation to power lines, roads and resorts. Biol Conserv 101(3):351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2003) Progressive impact of piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 113(2):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P, Støen O-G, Kaltenborn BP, Hanssen F, Helgesen R (2010) Effects of recreational cabins, trails and their removal for restoration of reindeer winter ranges. Restor Ecol 18(6):873–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzacchi M, Van Moorter B, Strand O (2012) A road in the middle of one of the last wild reindeer migrations routes in Norway: crossing behaviour and threats to conservation in Rangifer, Special Issue (in press)

  • Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH (1996) Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Funct Ecol 10:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polfus JL, Hebblewhite M, Heinemeyer K (2011) Identifying indirect habitat loss and avoidance of human infrastructure by northern mountain woodland caribou. Biol Conserv 144:2637–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. 11.1, R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Reimers E (1995) Rangifer population ecology: a scandinavian perspective. Rangifer 17(3):105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers E, Colman JE (2003) Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) response towards human activities. Rangifer, 26(2):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers E, Colman JE (2009) Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) response towards human activities. Rangifer 26(2):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers E, Miller FL, Eftestøl S, Colman JE, Dahle B (2006) Flight by feral reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus in response to a directly approaching human on foot or on skis. Wildl Biol 12(4):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers E, Dahle B, Eftestøl S et al (2007) Effects of a power line on migration and range use of wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 134(4):484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes JR, McAlpine CA, Zuur AF, Smith GM, Ieno EN (2009) GLMM applied to the spatial distribution of koalas in a fragmented landscape, mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

  • Robinson A, Crick HQP, Learmonth JA, Maclean IMD, Thomas CD, Bairlein F, Forchhammer MC, Francis CM, Gill JA, Godley BJ, Harwood J, Hays GC, Huntley B, Hutson AM, Pierce GJ, Rehfisch MM, Sims DW, Vieira dos Santos MC, Sparks TH, Stroud D, Visser ME (2009) Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. Endang Species Res 7(2):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ, Nielson RM, Horne JS (2009) Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscpe-level conservation. Ecol Appl 19:2016–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1986) Movements of tagged and radio-instrumented wild reindeer in relation to habitat alteration in the Snohetta region, Norway. Rangifer 1:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen T, McLoughlin PD, Hervieux D, Dzu E, Nolan J, Wynes B, Boutin S (2008) Determining sustainable levels of cumulative effects for boreal caribou. J Wildl Manag 72(4):900–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand O, Gundersen V, Panzacchi M, Andersen O, Falldorf T, Andersen R, Van Moorter B, Jordhøy P, Fangel K (2010) Human disturbance in wild reindeer range lands. NINA Report 551. 101 pp. ISBN: 978-82-426-2127-6

  • Strand O, Nilsen EB, Solberg EJ, Linnell JDC (2012) Can management regulate the population size of wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) through harvest? Can J Zool 90:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tofighi D, MacKinnon DP (2011) RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav Res Methods 43:692–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill JE, Angold PG (2000) Effects of roads on wildlife in an intensively modified landscape. Environ Rev 8(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildl Manag 47:893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes I, Nellemann C (2001) Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving. J Wildl Manag 65(4):915–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes I, Nellemann C (2008) The matter of spatial and temporal scales: a review of reindeer and caribou response to human activity. Polar Biol 31(4):399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhøy P et al (2001) Wild reindeer: impacts of progressive infrastructure development on distribution and range use. Polar Biol 24(7):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2004) Effects of infrastructure on migration and range use of wild reindeer. J Wildl Manag 68:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vors LS, Boyce MS (2009) Global declines of caribou and reindeer. Glob Chang Biol 15:2626–2633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Wikelski M (2008) Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing. PLoS Biol 6(7):e188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the Norwegian Directorate for nature management and a grant from the Norwegian Research Council under the program Norwegian environmental research towards 2015. We thank Roy Andersen, Runar Hole, Endre Hage and many others for invaluable help in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta-2, 7485, Trondheim, Norway

    Manuela Panzacchi, Bram Van Moorter, Per Jordhøy & Olav Strand

Authors
  1. Manuela Panzacchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bram Van Moorter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Per Jordhøy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olav Strand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Panzacchi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4925 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panzacchi, M., Van Moorter, B., Jordhøy, P. et al. Learning from the past to predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway. Landscape Ecol 28, 847–859 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9793-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9793-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation