Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 847–859 | Cite as

Learning from the past to predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway

  • Manuela Panzacchi
  • Bram Van Moorter
  • Per Jordhøy
  • Olav Strand
Research Article

Abstract

Norwegian wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus are divided into 23 virtually isolated populations, primarily due to the abandonment of traditional migration and movement corridors caused by the development of infrastructures. By conducting a nation-wide, interdisciplinary pre-post study on a temporal scale spanning centuries, we modelled current reindeer movements with respect to archaeological findings to quantify long-term changes in area use related to anthropogenic disturbance. The location of 3,113 pitfall traps and hunting blinds, built 600–2000 years ago and used until 350–400 years ago, testified the location of traditional movement corridors. Current movement routes were delineated using Brownian Bridge Movement Models based on 147 reindeer GPS-monitored during 10 years. Using Path Analysis we quantified direct, indirect and total effects of different infrastructures within multiple scales (1, 5, and 10 km-radius buffers) on the current probability of use of ancient movement corridors. Tourist cabins and roads had the strongest long-term direct effects at most scales: 1 tourist cabin and 1 km road within a 1 km-radius buffer would lead, respectively, to complete area abandonment, and to a 46 % decrease in the probability of use. Power lines and private cabins had significant indirect effects on area use through their effect on roads, while hiking trails and, in particular, hydroelectric dams had highly variable effects, not significant at a nation-wide scale. Finally, we provide a flexible tool to estimate the potential long-term direct and cumulative effects of different types of infrastructures at the desired spatial scale to be used for the development of future sustainable land management plans.

Keywords

Landscape connectivity Historic ecology Anthropogenic disturbance Migration corridors Infrastructures Roads Dams Cabins Power lines Cumulative effects 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the Norwegian Directorate for nature management and a grant from the Norwegian Research Council under the program Norwegian environmental research towards 2015. We thank Roy Andersen, Runar Hole, Endre Hage and many others for invaluable help in the field.

Supplementary material

10980_2012_9793_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4925 kb)

References

  1. Aarts G, MacKenzie M, McConnell B, Fedak M, Matthiopoulos J (2008) Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography 31:140–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakkestuen V, Erikstad L, Halvorsen R (2008) Step-less models for regional biogeoclimatic variation in Norway. J Biogeogr 35:1906–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J, Young JK, Berger KM (2008) Protecting migration corridors: Challenges and optimism for Mongolian saiga. PLoS Biol 6(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060165
  4. Bergman CM, Schaefer JA, Luttich SN (2000) Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 123(3):364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjørneraas K, Herfindal I, Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, van Moorter B, Rolandsen CM (2010) Screening GPS location data for errors using animal movement characteristics. J Wildl Manag 74(6):1261–1366Google Scholar
  6. Blehr O (1987) The need for ethnographical analogies in the study of prehistoric caribou/wild reindeer hunting: A case study from Sumtangen, Norway. In: Burenhult G, Carlsson A, Hyenstrand Å et al (eds) Theoretical approaches to artefacts, settlement and society. BAR International Series, Oxford, pp 87–93Google Scholar
  7. Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courbin N, Fortin D, Dussault C, Courtois R (2009) Landscape management for woodland caribou: the protection of forest blocks influences wolf-caribou co-occurrence. Landscape Ecol 24(10):1375–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahle B, Reimers E, Colman JE (2008) Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) avoidance of a highway as revealed by lichen measurements. Eur J Wildl Res 54(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DNT (2012) Norwegian Trekking Association. http://www.turistforeningen.no/english. Accessed Jan 2012
  11. Duchesne M, Côté SD, Barrette C (2000) Responses of woodland caribou to winter ecotourism in the Charlevoix Biosphere Reserve, Canada. Biol Conserv 96(3):311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer SJ, O’Neill JP, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2002) Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80(5):839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farnell R (2009) Three decades of caribou recovery programs in Yukon: a paradigm shift in wildlife management. MRC-09-01. Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse. 18sGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson MAD, Messier F (2000) Mass emigration of arctic tundra caribou from a traditional winter range: population dynamics and physical condition. J Wildl Manag 64:168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frid A, Dill LM (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11Google Scholar
  16. Fryxell J, Sinclair A (1988) Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends Ecol Evol 3(9):237–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaillard JM, Hebblewhite M, Loison A, Fuller M, Powell R, Basille M, Van Moorter B (2010) Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2255–2265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill JA, Norris K, Sutherland WJ (2001) Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance. Biol Conserv 97(2):265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagemoen RI, Reimers E (2002) Reindeer summer activity pattern in relation to weather and insect harassment. J Anim Ecol 71(5):883–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris G, Thirgood S, Hopcraft JG (2009) Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger Species Res 7(1):55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2007) Multiscale wolf predation risk for elk: does migration reduce risk? Oecologia 152:377–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helle T, Särkelä M (1993) The effects of outdoor recreation on range use by semi-domesticated reindeer. Scand J For Res 8:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88:2354–2363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R (2005) Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. Wildl Monogr 160:1–36Google Scholar
  26. Joly K, Nellemann C, Vistnes I (2006) A reevaluation of caribou distribution near an oilfield road on Alaska’s north slope. Wildl Soc B 34(3):870–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordhøy P (2008) Ancient wild reindeer pitfall trapping systems as indicators for former migration patterns and habitat use in the Dovre region, southern Norway. Rangifer 28(1):79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordhøy P, Binns KS, Støren SA (2005) Ancient wild reindeer hunting and trapping practices as indicators for former migration patterns, hunting organization and use of resources in the Dovre region. NINA Report 19, 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Leblond M, Frair J, Fortin D (2011) Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple spatial scales: an application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity. Landscape Ecol 26(10):1433–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacKinnon DP, Fritz MS, Williams J, Lockwood CM (2007) Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN. Behav Res Methods 39:384–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahoney SP, Schaefer JA (2002) Hydroelectric development and the disruption of migration in caribou. Biol Conserv 107(2):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mallord JW, Dolman PM, Brown AF, Sutherland WJ (2007) Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground-nesting passerine. J Appl Ecol 44:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matthiopoulos J (2003) The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecol Model 159:239–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ (2006) Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Sage publication Inc., Thousand Oaks 722 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Nellemann C, Jordhøy P, Støen O-G, Strand O (2000) Cumulative impacts of tourist resorts on wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) during winter. Arctic 53(1):9–17Google Scholar
  36. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P (2001) Winter distribution of wild reindeer in relation to power lines, roads and resorts. Biol Conserv 101(3):351–360Google Scholar
  37. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2003) Progressive impact of piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 113(2):307–317Google Scholar
  38. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P, Støen O-G, Kaltenborn BP, Hanssen F, Helgesen R (2010) Effects of recreational cabins, trails and their removal for restoration of reindeer winter ranges. Restor Ecol 18(6):873–881Google Scholar
  39. Panzacchi M, Van Moorter B, Strand O (2012) A road in the middle of one of the last wild reindeer migrations routes in Norway: crossing behaviour and threats to conservation in Rangifer, Special Issue (in press)Google Scholar
  40. Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH (1996) Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Funct Ecol 10:421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Polfus JL, Hebblewhite M, Heinemeyer K (2011) Identifying indirect habitat loss and avoidance of human infrastructure by northern mountain woodland caribou. Biol Conserv 144:2637–2646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R. 11.1, R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  43. Reimers E (1995) Rangifer population ecology: a scandinavian perspective. Rangifer 17(3):105–118Google Scholar
  44. Reimers E, Colman JE (2003) Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) response towards human activities. Rangifer, 26(2):55–71Google Scholar
  45. Reimers E, Colman JE (2009) Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) response towards human activities. Rangifer 26(2):55–71Google Scholar
  46. Reimers E, Miller FL, Eftestøl S, Colman JE, Dahle B (2006) Flight by feral reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus in response to a directly approaching human on foot or on skis. Wildl Biol 12(4):403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reimers E, Dahle B, Eftestøl S et al (2007) Effects of a power line on migration and range use of wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 134(4):484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhodes JR, McAlpine CA, Zuur AF, Smith GM, Ieno EN (2009) GLMM applied to the spatial distribution of koalas in a fragmented landscape, mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson A, Crick HQP, Learmonth JA, Maclean IMD, Thomas CD, Bairlein F, Forchhammer MC, Francis CM, Gill JA, Godley BJ, Harwood J, Hays GC, Huntley B, Hutson AM, Pierce GJ, Rehfisch MM, Sims DW, Vieira dos Santos MC, Sparks TH, Stroud D, Visser ME (2009) Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. Endang Species Res 7(2):101–113Google Scholar
  50. Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ, Nielson RM, Horne JS (2009) Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscpe-level conservation. Ecol Appl 19:2016–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skogland T (1986) Movements of tagged and radio-instrumented wild reindeer in relation to habitat alteration in the Snohetta region, Norway. Rangifer 1:267–272Google Scholar
  52. Sorensen T, McLoughlin PD, Hervieux D, Dzu E, Nolan J, Wynes B, Boutin S (2008) Determining sustainable levels of cumulative effects for boreal caribou. J Wildl Manag 72(4):900–905Google Scholar
  53. Strand O, Gundersen V, Panzacchi M, Andersen O, Falldorf T, Andersen R, Van Moorter B, Jordhøy P, Fangel K (2010) Human disturbance in wild reindeer range lands. NINA Report 551. 101 pp. ISBN: 978-82-426-2127-6Google Scholar
  54. Strand O, Nilsen EB, Solberg EJ, Linnell JDC (2012) Can management regulate the population size of wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) through harvest? Can J Zool 90:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tofighi D, MacKinnon DP (2011) RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav Res Methods 43:692–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Underhill JE, Angold PG (2000) Effects of roads on wildlife in an intensively modified landscape. Environ Rev 8(1):21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildl Manag 47:893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vistnes I, Nellemann C (2001) Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving. J Wildl Manag 65(4):915–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vistnes I, Nellemann C (2008) The matter of spatial and temporal scales: a review of reindeer and caribou response to human activity. Polar Biol 31(4):399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhøy P et al (2001) Wild reindeer: impacts of progressive infrastructure development on distribution and range use. Polar Biol 24(7):531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2004) Effects of infrastructure on migration and range use of wild reindeer. J Wildl Manag 68:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vors LS, Boyce MS (2009) Global declines of caribou and reindeer. Glob Chang Biol 15:2626–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilcove DS, Wikelski M (2008) Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing. PLoS Biol 6(7):e188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuela Panzacchi
    • 1
  • Bram Van Moorter
    • 1
  • Per Jordhøy
    • 1
  • Olav Strand
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations