Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 45–57 | Cite as

Landscape effects on scales of movement by white-tailed deer in an agricultural–forest matrix

  • David M. Williams
  • Amy C. Dechen Quinn
  • William F. Porter
Research Article

Abstract

Understanding how organisms respond to landscape heterogeneity is foundational to landscape ecology. We characterized seasonal scales of movement of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus viginianus) in an agricultural–forest matrix using first-passage time analysis (FPT) for 62 GPS-collared individuals. We investigated whether those scales were driven by demographic or landscape features. We found FPT for each individual across all seasons was typically dominated by a peak in variance of FPT/area at scales (radii) from 425 to 1,675 m. These peaks occurred at scales consistent with seasonal space use. We observed additional lower magnitude peaks at larger scales (3,000–6,000 m) and small scales (25–150 m). Peaks at larger scales were associated with seasonal migrations and dispersal events. Small scale peaks may represent resting or foraging behavior. Female movements were organized at smaller scales than males in the spring/summer season. Models relating landscape features to movement scales suggest that deer perceive and move within the landscape differently as the roles of dominant land-cover types shift seasonally. During winter, configuration (interspersion/juxtaposition) of land-cover types is more important to deer than during spring/summer and fall. During spring/summer and fall, movement behavior may be dictated by reproductive and harvest activities.

Keywords

First-passage time GPS collars Landscape structure Scales of movement Seasonality White-tailed deer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Brunner, J. Frair, J. Major, and H. B. Underwood for constructive criticism on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial support from the United States Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Project W-173-G. Additional support was provided by the United States Geological Survey and the McIntire-Stennis Foundation at SUNY-ESF.

References

  1. Alverson WS, Waller DM, Solheim SL (1988) Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv Biol 2(4):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson J, Hardy E, Roach J, Whimer R (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. United States Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell WJ (1991) Searching behavior: the behavioral ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand MR, DeNicola AJ, Beissinger SR, Swihart RK (1996) Effects of parturition on home ranges and social affiliations of female white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 60(4):899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197(3–4):516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conner MM, Ebinger MR, Blanchong JA, Cross PC (2008) Infectious disease in cervids of North America. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1134:146–172 (The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2008)Google Scholar
  7. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168(4):486–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dechen Quinn A (2010) Influences of movement behavior and space use in evaluating disease risk among white-tailed deer in central New York. PhD dissertation, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryGoogle Scholar
  9. Fauchald P (1999) Foraging in a hierarchical patch system. Am Nat 153(6):603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2003) Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 84(2):282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2006) Hierarchical patch dynamics and animal movement pattern. Oecologia 149(3):383–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fortin MJ, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortin MJ, Keitt TH, Maurer BA, Taper ML, Kaufman DM, Blackburn TM (2005) Species’ geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues. Oikos 108(1):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frair JL, Merrill EH, Visscher DR, Fortin D, Beyer HL, Morales JM (2005) Scales of movement by elk (Cervus elaphus) in response to heterogeneity in forage resources and predation risk. Landscape Ecol 20(3):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gautestad AO, Mysterud I (2005) Intrinsic scaling complexity in animal dispersion and abundance. Am Nat 165(1):44–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hölzenbein S, Marchinton RL (1992) Emigration and mortality in orphaned male white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 56(1):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Homer C, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Coan M (2004) Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 70:829–840Google Scholar
  18. Hurst JE, Porter WF (2008) Evaluation of shifts in white-tailed deer winter yards in the Adirondack region of New York. J Wildl Manag 72(2):367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kilgo JC, Labisky RF, Fritzen DE (1998) Influences of hunting on the behavior of white-tailed deer: implications for conservation of the Florida panther. Conserv Biol 12(6):1359–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilpatrick HJ, Lima KK (1999) Effects of archery hunting on movement and activity of female white-tailed deer in an urban landscape. Wildl Soc Bull 27(2):433–440Google Scholar
  21. Loehle C (1995) Social barriers to pathogen transmission in wild animal populations. Ecology 76(2):326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long ES, Diefenbach DR, Rosenberry CS, Wallingford BD (2008) Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer. Behav Ecol 19(6):1235–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
  24. McIntyre NE, Wiens JA (1999) How does habitat patch size affect animal movement? An experiment with darkling beetles. Ecology 80(7):2261–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKenzie HW, Lewis MA, Merrill EH (2009) First passage time analysis of animal movement and insights into the functional response. Bull Math Biol 71(1):107–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsinger KE, Fryxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85(9):2436–2445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(49):19052PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Climatic Data Center United States Monthly Surface Data. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html
  29. Nelson ME, Mech LD (1992) Dispersal in female white-tailed deer. J Mammal 73(4):891–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. New York State Office of Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure Coordination (2009) Street_Public. http://www.nysgis.state.ny.us/gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=932. New York State Office of Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure Coordination (CSCIC), Albany
  31. Ozoga JJ, Verme LJ, Bienz CS (1982) Parturition behavior and territoriality in white-tailed deer: impact on neonatal mortality. J Wildl Manag 46(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinaud D (2008) Quantifying search effort of moving animals at several spatial scales using first passage time analysis: effect of the structure of environment and tracking systems. J Appl Ecol 45(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  34. Senft R, Coughenour M, Bailey D, Rittenhouse L, Sala O, Swift D (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37(11):789–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Valeix M, Loveridge AJ, Davidson Z, Madzikanda H, Fritz H, Macdonald DW (2010) How key habitat features influence large terrestrial carnivore movements: waterholes and African lions in a semi-arid savanna of north-western Zimbabwe. Landscape Ecol 25(3):337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weckerly FW, Nelson JP (1990) Age and sex differences of white-tailed deer diet composition, quality, and calcium. J Wildl Manag 54(4):532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiens JA (1976) Population responses to patchy environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:81–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams DM (2010) Scales of movement and contact structure among white-tailed deer in central New York. PhD dissertation, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodson DL, Reed ET, Downing RL, McGinnes BS (1980) Effect of fall orphaning on white-tailed deer fawns and yearlings. J Wildl Manag 44(1):249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Worden KA, Pekins PJ (1995) Seasonal change in feed intake, body composition, and metabolic rate of white-tailed deer. Can J Zool 73:452–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Williams
    • 1
  • Amy C. Dechen Quinn
    • 1
  • William F. Porter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University, 13 Natural ResourcesEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations