Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 1287–1297 | Cite as

Nonlinear effects of distance to habitat edge on Sprague’s pipits in southern Alberta, Canada

  • Nicola Koper
  • David J. Walker
  • Janessa Champagne
Research article

Abstract

Effects of habitat edge may influence habitat quality, but landscape-scale implications of edge effects have rarely been quantified. Sprague’s pipit (Anthus spragueii), a grassland obligate songbird, is declining rapidly throughout its range. Although habitat loss is implicated in the decline, the causes are not well understood. We conducted 290 point counts across a 120 × 130 km study area in southern Alberta, Canada, between 2000 and 2002, and used nonlinear regression to determine effects of distance to water, roads, and cropland or forage habitats on relative abundance of Sprague’s pipits. We then used a geographic information system (GIS) to determine the effect of edges on habitat suitability as indexed by relative abundance. Sprague’s pipit relative abundances declined by 25% from the maximum predicted relative abundance within 900 m (CI = 660–1,280) of croplands or forage crops, and 340 m (CI = 280–460) of wetlands, but there was no effect of roads. Fewer than 1% of grassland patches in the study area contained any habitat far enough away from edge that they would be predicted to support at least 75% of the relative abundance of pipits expected in the absence of edge effects. Only 33% of the landscape can support 75% or more of the relative abundance expected in the absence of edge effects, as a result of habitat conversion or edge effects. Sprague’s pipit populations may be declining in part because edge effects greatly magnify effects of habitat loss.

Keywords

Alberta Canada Cropland Edge effects Mixed-grass prairie Nonlinear regression Roads Sprague’s pipits Wetlands 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the many research assistants who collected data, and landowners and leaseholders, for their support. J. Ruth drew our attention to the importance of Sprague’s pipits’ aerial display. B. Dale, S. Davis, B. Cade, editors, and 3 other anonymous reviewers provided editorial recommendations on earlier drafts. Support was provided by Ducks Unlimited Canada, The North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation, Antelope Creek Habitat Development Area, Science Horizons and Summer Career Placements (Environment Canada), the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, John and Patricia Schlosser Environment Scholarship, Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship, Bill Shostak Wildlife Award, Richard H. G. Bonnycastle Graduate Fellowship (Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited), Margaret (Peg) Brown Award in Environmental Studies and Wildlife Resources, Ralph Steinhauer Award, the University of Alberta Walter H. Johns Graduate Fellowship, and the Universities of Alberta and Manitoba.

References

  1. Beyer H (2003) Hawth’s analysis tools. Available from www.SpatialEcology.com. Accessed Mar 2004
  2. Bolger DT, Scott TA, Rotenberry JT (1997) Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conserv Biol 11:406–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollinger EK, Gavin TA (2004) Responses of nesting bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) to habitat edges. Auk 121:767–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson (1998) Model selection and inference:a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Centre for Topographic Information (2000) Updated road network (URN) product standards, edition 1.0. Natural Resources Canada, Quebec. Available from www.cits.rncan.gc.ca/cit/servlet/CIT/site_id=01&page_id=1-005-002-008.html. Accessed Oct 2002
  6. Davis SK (2004) Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: effects of patch size, patch shape, and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in southern Saskatchewan. Auk 121:1130–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis SK, Duncan DC, Skeel M (1999) Distribution and habitat associations of three endemic grassland songbirds in southern Saskatchewan. Wilson Bull 111:389–396Google Scholar
  8. Davis SK, Brigham RM, Shaffer TL, James PC (2006) Mixed-grass prairie passerines exhibit weak and variable responses to patch size. Auk 123:807–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Environment Canada (2005) Guidance document of statistical methods for environmental toxicity tests. Method development and applications section, Environmental Technology Centre, Environment Canada. EPS 1/RM/46Google Scholar
  10. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2007) The effect of fragment shape and species’ sensitivity to habitat edges on animal population size. Conserv Biol 21:926–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2008) Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5426–5429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher RJ Jr, Koford RR (2003) Spatial responses of bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) near different types of edges in northern Iowa. Auk 120:799–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fontaine AL, Kennedy PL, Johnson DH (2004) Effects of distance from cattle water developments on grassland birds. J Range Manag 57:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gates LW, Gysel JE (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelbard JL, Harrison S (2003) Roadless habitats as refuges for native grasslands: interactions with soil, aspect, and grazing. Ecol Appl 13:404–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoover JP, Tear TH, Baltz ME (2006) Edge effects reduce the nesting success of Acadian flycatchers in a moderately fragmented forest. J Field Ornithol 77:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutto RL (1998) Using landbirds as an indicator species group. In: Marzluff Salabanks (ed) Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, CoveloGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen WE, Cully JF Jr (2005) Density-dependent habitat selection by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 142:136–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson DH (2008) In defense of indices: the case of bird surveys. J Wildl Manage 72:857–868Google Scholar
  22. Johnson DH, Igl LD (2001) Area requirements of grassland birds: a regional perspective. Auk 118:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koper N, Schmiegelow FKA (2006) Effects of habitat management for ducks on target and non-target species. J Wildl Manage 70:823–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koper N, Schmiegelow FKA, Merrill EH (2007) Residuals cannot distinguish between ecological effects of habitat amount and fragmentation: implications for the debate. Landscape Ecol 22:811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laurance WF, Yensen E (1991) Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol Conserv 55:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linnen CG (2008) Effects of oil and gas development on prairie birds. Report to the Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada, Calgary, p 26Google Scholar
  27. Martin TE (1998) Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79:656–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Owens RA, Myres MT (1973) Effects of agriculture upon populations of native passerine birds of an Alberta fescue grasslands. Can J Zool 51:697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration—Agriculture Agri-Food Canada (2002). PFRA ungeneralized landcover for the Canadian Prairies, ReginaGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Reed JM, Blaustein AR (1997) Biologically significant population declines and statistical power. Conserv Biol 11:281–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renfrew RB, Ribic CA, Nack JL (2005) Edge avoidance by nesting grassland birds: a futile strategy in a fragmented landscape. Auk 122:618–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robbins MB, Dale BC (1999) Sprague’s pipit (Anthus spragueii). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, no. 439. The Academy of Natural Sciences and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Philadelphia, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  35. SAS Institute Inc. (2003) The SAS system for windows version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  36. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2008) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2007. Version 5.152.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, LaurelGoogle Scholar
  37. Slud EV, Byar DP, Green SB (1984) A comparison of reflected versus test-based confidence intervals for the median survival time, based on censored data. Biometrics 40:587–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Storch I, Woitke E, Krieger S (2005) Landscape-scale edge effect in predation risk in forest-farmland mosaics of central Europe. Landscape Ecol 20:927–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas L, Juanes F (1996) The importance of statistical power analysis: an example from animal behaviour. Anim Behav 52:856–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tischendorf L (2001) Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecol 16:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annual review of ecology. Evol Syst 36:319–344Google Scholar
  42. Van den Berg LJL, Bullock JM, Clarke RT, Langston RHW, Rose RJ (2001) Territory selection by the Dartford warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size. Biol Conserv 101:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Winter M, Johnson DH, Faaborg J (2000) Evidence for edge effects on multiple levels in tallgrass prairie. Condor 102:256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Koper
    • 1
  • David J. Walker
    • 2
  • Janessa Champagne
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Environment and GeographyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations