Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 403–415 | Cite as

Simulating the reciprocal interaction of forest landscape structure and southern pine beetle herbivory using LANDIS

  • David M. Cairns
  • Charles W. Lafon
  • John D. Waldron
  • Maria Tchakerian
  • Robert N. Coulson
  • Kier D. Klepzig
  • Andrew G. Birt
  • Weimin Xi
Research Article


The reciprocal interaction of landscape structure and ecological processes is a cornerstone of modern landscape ecology. We use a simulation model to show how landscape structure and herbivory interact to influence outbreaks of southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann) in a landscape representative of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. We use LANDIS and its biological disturbance agent module to simulate the effects of landscape composition (proportion of landscape in host area) and host aggregation on the size and severity of insect outbreaks and the persistence of the host species, Table Mountain Pine (Pinus pungens Lamb.). We find that landscape composition is less important in the modeled landscapes than host aggregation in structuring the severity of insect outbreaks. Also, simulated southern pine beetle outbreaks over time tend to decrease the aggregation of host species on the landscape by fragmenting large patches into smaller ones, thereby reducing the severity of future outbreaks. Persistence of Table Mountain pine decreases throughout all simulations regardless of landscape structure. The results of this study indicate that when considering alternative restoration strategies for insect-affected landscapes, it is necessary to consider the patterns of hosts on the landscape as well as the landscape composition.


Disturbance LANDIS BDA Insect outbreak Table Mountain pine 



This research was supported through USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station cooperative agreement SRS03-CA-11330129–168. We thank Brian Sturtevant, David Loftis, Henry McNab, Thomas Waldrop, and James Vose for their input.


  1. Bruinderink G, van der Sluis T, Lammertsma D, Opdam P, Pouwels R (2003) Designing a coherent ecological network for large mamals in northwestern Europe. Conserv Biol 17:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coulson RN (1981) Population dynamics. In: Thatcher RC, Searcy JL, Coster JE, Hertel GD (eds) The southern pine beetle: USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1631. Washington, pp 70–105Google Scholar
  3. Coulson RN, Stephen FM (2006) Impacts of insects in forest landscapes: implications for forest health management. In: Paine TD (ed) Invasive forest insects, introduced forest trees, and altered ecosystems: ecological pest management in global forests of a changing world. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Coulson RN, Wunneburger WF (2000) Impact of insects on human-dominated and natural forest landscapes. In: Coleman DC, Hendrix PF (eds) Invertebrates as webmasters of ecosystems. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Coulson RN, McFadden BA, Pulley PE, Lovelady CN, Fitzgerald JW, Jack SB (1999) Heterogeneity of forest landscapes and the distribution and abundance of the southern pine beetle. For Ecol Manage 114:471–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species trains and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fettig CJ, Klepzig KD, Billings RF, Munson AS, Nebeker TE, Negron JF, Nowak JT (2007) The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For Ecol Manage 238:24–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gamarra JGP (2005) Metapopulations in multifractal landscapes: on the role of spatial aggregation. Proc R Soc B 272:1815–1822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gan J (2004) Risk and damage of southern pine beetle outbreaks under global climate change. For Ecol Manage 191:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner RH (1999). RULE: map generation and spatial analysis program. In: Klopatek M, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert M, Nageleisen L-M, Franklin A, Gregoire J-C (2005) Post-storm surveys reveal large-scale spatial patterns and influences of site factors, forest structure and diversity in endemic bark-beetle populations. Landsc Ecol 20:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gumpertz ML, Wu C, Pye JM (2000) Logistic regression for southern pine beetle outbreaks with spatial and temporal autocorrelation. For Sci 46:95–107Google Scholar
  13. He HS, Mladenoff DJ (1999) Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He HS, Mladenoff DJ, Boeder J (1996) LANDIS, a spatially explicit model of forest landscape disturbance, management and succession—LANDIS 2.0 users’ guide. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  15. He HS, Shang BZ, Crow TR, Gustafson EJ, Shifley SR (2004) Simulating forest fuel and fire risk dynamics across landscapes – LANDIS fuel module design. Ecol Modell 180:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG (2007) Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett 10:835–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jactel H, Goulard M, Menassieu P, Goujon G (2002) Habitat diversity in forest plantations reduces infestations of the pine stem borer Dioryctria sylvestrella. J Appl Ecol 39:618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jules ES, Kauffman MJ, Ritts WD, Carroll AL (2002) Spread of an invasive pathogen over a variable landscape: a nonnative root rot on Port Orford cedar. Ecology 83:3167–3181Google Scholar
  19. Lafon CW, Kutac MJ (2003) Effects of ice storms, southern pine beetle infestation, and fire on table mountain pine forests of southwestern Virginia. Phys Geogr 24:502–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lafon CW, Waldron JD, Cairns DM, Tchakerian MD, Coulson JC, Klepzig KD (2007) Modeling the effects of fire on the long-term dynamics and restoration of yellow pine and oak forests in the southern Appalachian mountains. Restor Ecol 15:400–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li X, He HS, Wang X, Bu R, Hu Y, Chang Y (2004) Evaluating the effectiveness of neutral landscape models to represent a real landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 69:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Mladenoff DJ (2004) LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol Modell 180:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (1999) Development of forest and landscape modeling approaches. In: Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  25. Mladenoff DJ, He HS (1999) Design and behavior of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. In: Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–162Google Scholar
  26. Mladenoff DJ, Host G, Boeder J, Crow T (1996) LANDIS: a spatial model of forest landscape disturbance, succession and management. In: Goodchild M, Steyaert L, Parks BO, Johnston C, Maidment D, Craine M, Glendinning S (eds) GIS and environmental modeling: progress and research issues. GIS World Books, Fort Collins, pp 175–179Google Scholar
  27. Peterjohn W, Correll D (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peterson GD (2002) Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powers J, Sollins P, Harmon ME, Jones JA (1999) Plant-pest interactions in time and space: a Douglas-fir bark beetle outbreak as a case study. Landsc Ecol 14:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Price TS, Doggett CA, Pye JM, Holmes TP (1998) A history of southern pine beetle outbreaks in the southern United States. The Georgia Forestry Commission, MaconGoogle Scholar
  31. Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, Boyce MS (2000) The changing relation of landscape patterns and jack pine budworm populations during an outbreak. Oikos 90:417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roland J (1993) Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia 93:25–30Google Scholar
  33. Schowalter TD, Turchin P (1993) Southern pine-beetle infestation development—interaction between pine and hardwood basal areas. For Sci 39:201–210Google Scholar
  34. Shifley SR, Thompson FR, Larsen DR, Dijak WD (2000) Modeling forest landscape change in the Missouri Ozarks under alternative management practices. Comput Electron Agric 27:7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sturtevant BR, Gustafson EJ, Li W, He HS (2004) Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm. Ecol Modell 180:153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Syphard AD, Franklin J (2004) Spatial aggregation effects on the simulation of landscape pattern and ecological processes in southern California plant communities. Ecol Modell 180:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turchin P, Thoeny WT (1993) Quantifying dispersal of southern pine beetles with mark-recapture experiments and a diffusion model. Ecol Appl 3:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner M (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner M (2005a) Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:319–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner M (2005b) Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86:1967–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner M, Gardner RH, Dale VH, O’Neill RV (1989) Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos 55:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waldron JD, Lafon CW, Coulson RN, Cairns DM, Tchakerian MD, Birt A, Klepzig KD (2007) Simulating the impacts of southern pine beetle and fire on the dynamics of xerophytic pine landscapes in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Appl Veg Sci 10:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams CE (1998) History and status of Table Mountain pine—Pitch pine forests of the southern Appalachian mountains (USA). Nat Areas J 18:81–90Google Scholar
  44. Ylioja T, Slone DH, Ayres MP (2005) Mismatch between herbivore behavior and demographics contributes to scale-dependence of host susceptibility in two pine species. For Sci 51:522–531Google Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Zeide B (1999) Which trees and stands are attacked by the southern pine beetle? South J Appl For 23:217–223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Cairns
    • 1
  • Charles W. Lafon
    • 1
  • John D. Waldron
    • 2
  • Maria Tchakerian
    • 3
  • Robert N. Coulson
    • 3
  • Kier D. Klepzig
    • 4
  • Andrew G. Birt
    • 3
  • Weimin Xi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeographyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of West FloridaFt. Walton BeachUSA
  3. 3.Knowledge Engineering Laboratory, Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  4. 4.USDA Forest Service Southern Research StationPinevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations