Landscape Ecology

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 1007–1018 | Cite as

Using place names to interpret former floodplain connectivity in the Morava River, Czech Republic

Research Article


Toponyms, or place names have been used to reveal historical land-use patterns based on degree of wetness in the Morava River floodplain. Eleven patch types were plotted on three land cover types representing broad ecological niches with different moisture regimes for four time periods. The river’s simultaneous decrease in sinuosity, which underscores the loss of the landscape’s ecohydrological connectivity, was quanified. The results show that long-term human-dominated land use worked in concert with a naturally occuring seasonal flood regime. The findings strongly indicate that high human density and intensive exploitation can co-exist with a functioning floodplain. Landscape change was interpreted by using a new concept, that of the place-name patch, which can be universally applied to interpret historical land use changes in river basins. Our method is reproducible in river basins with a history of intensive human use.


Place names Place name patch Morava River floodplain River restoration 



The authors would like to express their gratitude for the thoughtful and detailed commentary provided by two anonymous reviews which helped to improve the quality of the final paper. In addition, they would like to thank Luis Sánchez Soto, who gave generously of his time, and Dusan Gavenda, who provided much appreciated technical support.


  1. Alcázar A, Martínez A, Rey Benayas J, Ruiz J (1988) Toponomia y léxico relacionados con las descargas de aguas subterráneas en la cuenca del Duero [Toponymy and words related to flowing waters and subterranean waters in the Duero basin]. Estudios Geográficos 192:329–339Google Scholar
  2. Aybes C, Yalden D (1985) Place-name evidence for the former distribution and status of wolves and beavers in Britain. Mammal Rev 25:201–226Google Scholar
  3. Baker H (1937) Alluvial meadows: a comparative study of grazed and mowen meadows. J Ecol 25:408–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beranová M (1986) Types of Slavic agricultural production in the 6th–12th centuries AD. Ethnologia Slavica 16:7–48Google Scholar
  5. Boisseau S, Yalden D (1998) The former status of the crane Grus grus in Britain. Ibis 140: 482–500Google Scholar
  6. Bolliger J, Schulte L, Burrows S, Sickley T, Mledenoff D (2004) Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (U.S.A.) using historical landscape reconstructions. Restor Ecol 12:124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buell F, Wistendahl W (1955) Flood plain forests of the Raritan River. B Torrey Bot Club 82:463–472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butzer K (1971) Environment and archaeology: an ecological approach to prehistory. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. COSMC (Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadestre) (1957–1991) Základní mapa ČR [Basic Map of Czech Republic], scale 1:25,000 and 1:10,000, JTSK system. PragueGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox J, Maehr D, Larkin J (2002) The biogeography of faunal place-names in the United States. Conserv Biol 16:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Décamps H, Fortuné M, Gazelle M, Puatou G (1988) Historical influence of man on the riparian dynamics of a fluvial landscape. Landscape Ecol 1:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demek J, Střida M (eds) (1971) Geography of Czechoslovakia. Academia Press, PragueGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennell R, Webley D (1975) Prehistoric settlement and land use in southern Bulgaria. In: Higgs E (ed) Palaeoeconomy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Dritte Militär-Landesaufnahme der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie [3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austro-Hungarian Empire] (1869–1887, scale 1:25,000). Militärgeographisches Institut, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. Edmonds N (1989) Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscapes, monuments and memory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans C, Pollard J, Knight M (1999) Life in woods: tree-throws, ‘settlement’, and forest cognition. OJA 18:241–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Everitt A (1977) River and wold: reflections on the historical origins of regions and pays. J Hist Geogr 3:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flom G (1924) Place-name tests of racial mixture in Northern England. MLN 39:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García Latorre J, Sánchez Picón A, García Latorre J (2001a) The man-made desert: effects of economic and demographic growth on the ecosystems of arid southeastern Spain. Environ Hist 6:75–94Google Scholar
  20. García Latorre J, García Latorre J, Sánchez Picón A (2001b) Dealing with aridity: socio-economic structures and environmental changes in an arid Mediterranean region. Land Use Policy 18:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gelling M (2000) Place names in the landscape: the geographical roots of Britain’s place names. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Gojda M (1991) The ancient Slavs: settlement and society. The Rhind Lectures 1989–1990. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  23. González Bernáldez F (1992) Paisajes del agua: terminiologia popular de los humedales [Landscapes of water: the popular terminology of wetlands]. J. M. Reyero, MadridGoogle Scholar
  24. Green R, Robins M (1993) The decline of the ornithological importance of the Somerset levels and moors, England and changes in the management of water levels. Biol Cons 66:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidinga H (1987) Medieval settlement and economy north of the Lower Rhine: archaeology and history of Kootwijk and the Veluwe (The Netherlands). Van Gorcum, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooke D (1989) Pre-conquest woodland: Its distribution and usage. Agr Hist Rev 37:113–129Google Scholar
  27. Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S (2002) Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biol 47:867–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lane C (1980) The development of pastures and meadows during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Agr Hist Rev 28:18–30Google Scholar
  29. Leaper R, Massel G, Gorman M, Aspinall R (1999) The feasibility of reintroducing Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) to Scotland. Mammal Rev 29:239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lutterer I, Majtán M, Šrámek R (1982) Zeměpisná jména Československa [Geographical names of Czechoslovakia]. Mladá Fronta, PragueGoogle Scholar
  31. Machek V (1954) Česká a slovenská jména rostlin [Czech and Slovak names of plants]. Czechoslovak Academy of Science, PragueGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore P (2002) Ravens (Corvus corax corax L.) in the British landscape: a thousand years of ecological biogeography in place names. J Biogeogr 29:1039–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nienhaus P, Buijse A, Leuven R, Smits A, de Nooij R, Samborska E (2002) Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearsall W (1961) Place names as clues in the pursuit of ecological history. Namn Och Bygd 49:72–89Google Scholar
  35. Petts G (1989) Historical analysis of fluvial hydrosystems. In: Petts G, Möller H, Roux A (eds) Historical change of large alluvial rivers. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  36. Ponting C (1991) A green history of the world: the environment and the collapse of great civilizations. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Rackham O (1986) The history of the countryside. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Regier H (1989) Rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 106:86–97Google Scholar
  39. RIASC (Research Institute of Ameliorations and Soil Conservation, Czech Republic) (1973–1978) Bonitační mapy zemědělských půd ČR (BPEJ) [Soil-productivity maps of agricultural land], scale 1:5,000. PragueGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherratt A (1982) The development of Neolithic and Copper Age settlement in the Great Hungarian plain. Part I: The regional setting. OJA 1:287–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sousa A, García-Murillo P (2001) Can place names be used as indicators of landscape changes? Application to the Doñana Natural Park (Spain). Landscape Ecol 16:391–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sousa A, García-Murillo P (2003) Changes in the wetlands of Andalucia (Doñana Natural Park, SW Spain) at the end of the Little Ice Age. Clim Change 58:193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sweeney S (2001) Water-related Issues in the Czech Republic: the context of environmental restoration. Ekológia (Bratislava) 19:435–448Google Scholar
  44. Sweeney S, Ptáček P, Létal A (2002) Institutional lock-in as an impediment to sustainable land use in the Morava River floodplain. Moravian Geograph Rep 10:15–25Google Scholar
  45. Ward J, Tockner K, Arscott D, Claret C (2002) Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biol 47:517–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watkins C (ed) (1998) European woods and forests: Studies in cultural history. CAB International, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Webster J (2001) A review of the historical evidence of the habitat of the Pine Marten in Cumbria. Mammal Rev 31:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whittle A (1985) Neolithic Europe: a survey. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Yalden D (2002) Place name and archaeological evidence on the recent history of birds in Britain. Acta Zool Cracoviensia 45:415–429Google Scholar
  50. Zweite Militär-Landesaufnahme der habsburgischen Monarchie [2nd Military Mapping Survey of Hapsburg Empire] (1806–1869, scale 1:28,800). KK Hof- and Staats-drückerei, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  51. Žmolík M (2002) Soubor historických map územně správního členění území dnešní ČR v prostředcích GIS [Collection of historical maps of administrative divisions of today’s Czech Republic in GIS]. MSc. thesis, Palacký UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural SciencesPalacky UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural SciencesPalacky UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations