Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics on ant assemblages in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability of ants as bioindicators of ecosystem condition is dependent on the consistency of their response to localised habitat characteristics, which may be modified by larger-scale effects of habitat fragmentation and loss. We assessed the relative contribution of habitat fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics in determining ant assemblages in semi-arid woodland in Queensland, Australia. Species and functional group abundance were recorded using pitfall traps across 20 woodland patches in landscapes that exhibited a range of fragmentation states. Of fragmentation measures, changes in patch area and patch edge contrast exerted the greatest influence on species assemblages, after accounting for differences in habitat loss. However, 35% of fragmentation effects on species were confounded by the effects of habitat characteristics and habitat loss. Within-patch habitat characteristics explained more than twice the amount of species variation attributable to fragmentation and four times the variation explained by habitat loss. The study indicates that within-patch habitat characteristics are the predominant drivers of ant composition. We suggest that caution should be exercised in interpreting the independent effects of habitat fragmentation and loss on ant assemblages without jointly considering localised habitat attributes and associated joint effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abensperg–Traun M, Smith GT, Arnold GW et al (1996) The effects of habitat fragmentation and livestock–grazing on animal communities in remnants of gimlet Eucalyptus salubris woodland in the Western Australian wheatbelt. 1. Arthropods. J Appl Ecol 33:1281–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1995) A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 22:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1997) Using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. In: Conservation Ecology 1:8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art8. Cited 17 December 2004

  • Andersen AN, Majer JD (2004) Ants show the way Down Under: invertebrates as bioindicators in land management. Front Ecol Environ 2:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (2001) Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11:1123–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhar R, Fahrig L (1998) Local vs. landscape effects of woody field borders as barriers to crop pest movement. In: Conservation Ecology 2:3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art3. Cited 22 December 2005

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DMJS, Prior LD (2004) Impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on woody vegetation in Eucalyptus tetrodonta savanna in Arnhem Land, northern Australia. J Biogeogr 31:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric–Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effects of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chust G, Pretus JL, Ducrot D et al (2003) Identification of landscape units from an insect perspective. Ecography 26: 257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2002) Hierarchical, multi–scale decomposition of species–environment relationships. Landsc Ecol 17:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Margules CR (2001) Effects of within– and between–patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmentation experiment. Ecology 82:1830–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis–Carter JG, Sheppard DC (1993) Redistribution of metals and nutrients by fire ants in a flue dust contaminated pasture. Soil Biol Biochem 25:747–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn LAL (1993) Ant composition and activity in naturally–vegetated and farmland environments on contrasting soils at Kellerberrin, Western Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1043–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Cons Biol 14:342–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Lawton JH (1999) Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61:603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ, Archer SR (2005) Rainfall, land use and woody vegetation cover change in semi-arid Australian savanna. J Ecol 93:596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley P (1997) Extinction models for local populations. In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner SM, Cabido MR, Valladares GR et al (1995) The influence of habitat structure on arthropod diversity in Argentine semi-arid Chaco forest. J Veg Sci 6:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM, Greenslade P (1977) Some effects of vegetation cover and disturbance on tropical ant fauna. Insectes Soc 24:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM, Halliday RB (1983) Colony dispersion and relationships of meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus and allies in an arid locality in South Australia. Insectes Soc 30:82–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinto DF, Saffigna PG, Xu Z et al (1999) Soil nitrogen mineralisation and organic matter composition revealed by 13C NMR spectroscopy under repeated prescribed burning in eucalypt forests of south-east Queensland. Aust J Soil Res 37:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RA (2000) Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81:1120–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in Southwestern Australia. Cons Biol 15:1522–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austr Ecol 28:444–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer–Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GP, Fox BJ (1996) Comparison of regeneration following burning, clearing or mineral sand mining at Tomago, NSW. II. Succession of ant assemblages in a coastal forest. Aust J Ecol 21:200–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek S, Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB (2004) Environmental and vegetation variables have a greater influence than habitat fragmentation in structuring lizard communities in remnant urban bushland. Austr Ecol 29:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jules ES, Shahani P (2003) A broader ecological context to fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important that we thought. J Veg Sci 14:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) (1997) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1987) Are there assembly rules for successional communities In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonisation, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin D (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Cons Biol 14:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt ID, Spooner PG (2005) Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented historical landscapes. J Biogeogr 32:1859–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, GTR–351, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S, Barrett GW (1992) Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation. Cons Biol 6:146–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R, Bennett AF, Horrocks G (2000) Forecasting the impacts of fragmentation. Evaluation of species–specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia. Biol Conserv 95:7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1991) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TG, Green JL (2002) Wildlife and core conservation areas In: McIntyre S, McIvor JG, Heard KM (eds) Managing and conserving grassy woodlands. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne BA (1999) Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. Aust J Ecol 24: 228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (2001) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. Eur J Entomol 98:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland RH (1999) On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. J Veg Sci 10: 131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottonetti L, Tucci L & Santini G (2006) Recolonization patterns of ants in a rehabilitated lignite mine in central Italy: potential for the use of Mediterranean ants as indicators of restoration processes. Restor Ecol 14: 60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharo EJ, Lindenmayer DB, Taws N (2004) The effects of large–scale fragmentation on bryophytes in temperate forests. J Appl Ecol 41:910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water (2003) Land cover changes in Queensland 1999–2003: a statewide land and tree study report (SLATS). Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water, Brisbane

  • Ross KA, Fox BJ, Fox MD (2002) Changes to plant species richness in forest fragments: fragment age, disturbance and fire history may be as important as area. J Biogeogr 29:749–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell–Smith J, Stanton P (2002) Fire regimes and fire management of rainforest communities across northern Australia In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill, AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways M, Osborn R, Carliel F (1997) Effect of a highway on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species composition and abundance, with a recommendation for roadside verge width. Biodivers Conserv 6:903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler PS, Williams RD (eds) (1999) The conservation status of Queensland’s bioregional ecosystems. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Cons Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoereder JH, Sobrinho TG, Ribas CR et al (2004) Colonization and extinction of ant communities in a fragmented landscape. Aust Ecol 29:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrinho TG, Schoereder JH, Sperber C F et al (2003) Does fragmentation alter species composition in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)? Sociobiol 42:329–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Niemelä JK (1994) Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. Can Entomol 126: 881–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows users guide: software for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer Power, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V et al (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A et al (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderwoude C (1999) An evaluation of ant communities as indicators of ecological change resulting from anthropogenic disturbance in spotted gum (Corymbia variegata) forests in south-east Queensland. Dissertation, University of New England

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderwoude C, Andersen AN, House APN (1997) Community organization, biogeography and seasonality of ants in an open forest of south-eastern Queensland. Aust J Zool 45:523–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1997) Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Shen W, Sun W et al (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landsc Ecol 17:761–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted as part of Land and Water Australia Project QNR 28, with financial support from Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water. We thank landowners for property access and Landcare members for assistance with locating study sites. We thank David Taylor, Scott Swift, Michael Kraus, Melanie Venz, Giselle Whish, Jian Wang, Tonya Hardaker and David Osborne who provided data for this study and we are grateful to Chris Burwell, Rudi Kohout and Alan Andersen for assistance with species identification. We thank Alan Andersen and two anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie J. Debuse.

Additional information

The State of Queensland's right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix 1 Abundance rating of 116 morphospecies/species collected in pitfall traps in March and August 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debuse, V.J., King, J. & House, A.P. Effect of fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics on ant assemblages in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia. Landscape Ecol 22, 731–745 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9068-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9068-0

Keywords

Navigation