Landscape Ecology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 319–322 | Cite as

A theory greyer than grey



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951) An upland forest continuum in the forest-prairie border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 342–444Google Scholar
  3. Ellenberg H (1956) Aufgaben und Methoden der Vegetationskunde. Band IV, Teil I of H. Walter’s Einführung in die Phytologie. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. Glenn-Lewin DC, Peet RK, Veblen TT (eds) (1992) Plant succession: theory and prediction. Chapman & Hall, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Leape JP (2006) Are we winning the race to stop biodiversity loss? A Guest Commentary, Environmental News Network 23 MarchGoogle Scholar
  6. McIntosh RP (1967) The continuum concept of vegetation. Bot Rev 33:130–187 (see also: Responses, Botanical Review 34:253–332)Google Scholar
  7. Weiher E, Keddy P (eds) (1999) Ecological assembly rules—perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Whittaker RH (1962) Classification of natural communities. Bot Rev 28:1–239Google Scholar
  9. Whittaker RH (ed) (1978a) Classification of plant communities. Dr. W. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  10. Whittaker RH (ed) (1978b) Ordination of plant communities. Dr. W. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Science Graduate Program and School of Environment and Natural ResourcesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations