Abstract
The thematic resolution of mapped data determines the amount of detail of geospatial information, and influences various aspects of landscape classification and the relevance of derived pattern attributes to particular ecological questions. Here we show that changing thematic resolution may significantly affect landscape metrics and in turn their ability to detect landscape changes. The effects of thematic resolution on many landscape metrics tend to show consistent general patterns, but the details of these patterns are likely to be dependent on specific landscape patterns and classification criteria. Thus, the effects of thematic resolution, like those with regard to grain and extent, must be considered in landscape pattern analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Anderson JR, Hardy E, Roach J, Witmer R (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Government Printing Office, Washington
Baldwin DJB, Weaver K, Schnekenburger F, Perera AH (2004) Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use in natural disturbance emulation. Landscape Ecol 19:255–271
Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2006) Characterizing Phoenix urban growth patterns with landscape metrics based on remote sensing data: Effects of thematic resolutions. In: Proceedings of 8th Annual Symposium Central Arizona-Phoenix LTER, Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp 11
Federal Geographic Data Committee (1997) Vegetation Classification Standard. http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/vegetation/vegclass.pdf. Cited 11 Apr 2006
Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 13:167–186
Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 11:129–140
Li H, Reynolds JF (1993) A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecol 8:155–162
Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol 19:389–399
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon
Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2004) Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecol 19:435–455
Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, Norwich, England
Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins KBJ, Jackson BL (1995). A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol 10:23–39
Saura S (2004) Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landscape Ecol 19:197–209
Scott JM, Jennings MD (1998) Large-area mapping of biodiversity. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:34–47
Shen W, Jenerette GD, Wu J, Gardner RH (2004) Evaluating empirical relations of pattern metrics with simulated landscapes. Ecography 27:459–469
Stefanov WL (2000) 1985, 1990, 1993, 1998 Land cover maps of the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. Geologic Remote Sensing Laboratory, Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe
Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sens Environ 77:173–185
Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 3:153–162
Wickham JD, Riitters KH (1995) Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. Int J Remote Sens 16:3585–3595
Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale in landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19:125–138
Wu J (in press) Scale and scaling: a cross-disciplinary perspective. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Wu J, Jelinski DE (1995) Pattern and scale in ecology: the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Li Bo (ed) Lectures in modern ecology. Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–9
Wu J, Jelinski D, Luck M, Tueller P (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inform Sci 6:6–19
Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, Tueller P (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 17:761–782
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BCS-0508002 (Biocomplexity/CNH) and DEB 9714833 (CAP-LTER).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buyantuyev, A., Wu, J. Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landscape Ecol 22, 7–13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9010-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9010-5