Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 1267–1279 | Cite as

Landscape improvement, or ongoing degradation – reconciling apparent contradictions from the arid rangelands of Western Australia

  • Hugh J. R. Pringle
  • Ian W. Watson
  • Ken L. Tinley
Research Article


Recent quantitative site-based monitoring and qualitative aerial and ground traverses provide contrasting assessments of the health of much of the arid shrublands of Western Australia extensively grazed by livestock (‘rangelands’). Although these results seem incompatible, we explain the apparent contradictions based on landscape succession processes operating at multiple levels of ecological organisation. Specifically, we suggest that the intact areas in which site-based monitoring is conducted are contracting as catchment canalisation and desiccation increase. However, the impacts of these processes have not yet become manifest at the site scale. The site-based system addresses important regional questions. These relate to the large, relatively intact areas away from most active surface flows, which should be a focus for resource conservation, given practical limits to repairing widespread degradation with low management inputs. We provide a complementary set of questions to provide a more comprehensive audit of rangeland dynamics in the context of underlying hierarchical landscape patterns and processes that might threaten intact areas. We recognise the need to match questions and levels of ecological organisation and the implications these have for sampling. We also recognise the difficulty in producing concise statements of change for clients when reporting on complex ecological issues and processes. Without a clearly articulated, and well understood, hierarchical model of pattern and process within which apparently contradictory findings can be reported meaningfully, policy makers may be confused by the results, with the consequent risk of policy inaction.


Arid shrublands Catchment function Ecological organisation Hierarchy Landscape function Landscape processes Monitoring Policy Rangeland monitoring Reporting 


  1. Allen, T.F.H., Hoekstra, T.W. 1992Toward a Unified EcologyColumbia University PressNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen T.F.H., O’Neill R.V.O. and Hoekstra T.W. 1984. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. General Technical Report RM-110, USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T.F.H., Starr, T.B. 1982Hierarchy Perspective for Ecological ComplexityUniversity of Chicago PressChicago, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Anon,  1998Gascoyne–Murchison Western Australia Climatic surveyBureau of Meteorology, Department of the Environment and HeritageCanberra, ACT, Australia113Google Scholar
  5. Bastin, G.N., Ludwig, J.A., Eager, R.W., Chewings, V.H., Liedloff, A.C. 2002Indicators of landscape function: comparing patchiness metrics using remotely-sensed data from rangelandsEcol. Indicat.1247260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergkamp, G. 1995A hierarchical approach for desertification assessmentEnviron. Monit. Assess.375978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briske, D.D., Fuhlendorf, S.D., Smiens, F.E. 2003Vegetation dynamics on rangelands: A critique of the current paradigmsJ. Appl. Ecol.40601614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briske, D.D., Fuhlendorf, S.D., Smiens, F.E. 2005State-and-transition models, thresholds and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological models and perspectivesRange Ecol. Manage.58110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christian, C.S., Stewart, G.A. 1953General Report on Survey of Katherine–Darwin region, 1946. CSIRO Australian Land Research Series, Number 1CSIROMelbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Coughenour, M.B., Ellis, J.E. 1993Landscape and climate control of woody vegetation in a dry tropical ecosystem: Turkana District, KenyaJ. Biogeogr.20383398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curry, P.J., Payne, A.L., Leighton, K.A., Hennig, P., Blood, D. 1994An Inventory and Condition Survey of the Murchison River Catchment and Surrounds, Western AustraliaDepartment of Agriculture Western AustraliaPerth, Western Australia430Google Scholar
  12. DeAngelis, D.L., Waterhouse, J.C. 1987Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological modelsEcol. Monogr.57121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eve, M.D., Whitford, W.G., Havstadt, K.M. 1999Applying satellite imagery to triage assessment of ecosystem healthEnviron. Monit. Assess.54205227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedel, M.H. 1994How spatial and temporal scale affect the perception of change in rangelandsThe Rangeland J.161625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedel, M.H., Pickup, G., Nelson, D.J. 1993The interpretation of vegetation change in a spatially and temporally diverse Australian landscapeJ. Arid Environ.24241260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuhlendorf, S.D., Smiens, F.E. 1998The influence of soil depth on plant species response to grazing within a semi-arid savannaPlant Ecol.1388996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuhlendorf, S.D., Smiens, F.E. 1999Scaling effects of grazing in a semi-arid savannaJ. Veget. Sci.10731738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, J.W. 1985Census of Vascular Plants of Western AustraliaDepartment of Agriculture Western AustraliaPerth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  19. Hacker, R.B. 1984Vegetation dynamics in a grazed mulga shrubland community. I the mid-storey shrubsAust. J. Bot.32239249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacker, R.B. 1987Species responses to grazing and environmental factors in an arid halophytic shrubland communityAust. J. Bot.35135150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holm, A.M., Burnside, D.G., Mitchell, A.A. 1987The development of a system for monitoring trend in range condition in the arid shrublands of Western AustraliaAustr. Rangeland J.91420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Illius, A.W., O’Connor, T.G. 1999On the relevance of non-equilibrium to arid and semi-arid grazing systemsEcol. Appl.9798813Google Scholar
  23. Illius, A.W., O’Connor, T.G. 2000Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamicsOikos89283294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, L.C. 1963South African Scenery. A Textbook of Geomorphology3Oliver and Boyd LtdEdinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Levin, S.A. 1992The problem of pattern and scale in ecologyEcology7319431967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludwig, J.A., Bastin, G.N., Eager, R.W., Karfs, R., Ketner, P., Pearce, G. 2000Monitoring Australian rangeland sites using landscape function indicators and ground and remote-based techniquesEnviron. Monit. Assess.64164178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludwig, J.A., Tongway, D.J. 1995Desertification in Australiaan eye to grass roots and landscapesEnviron. Monit. Assess.37231237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morton, S.R., Stafford Smith, D.M., Friedel, M.H., Griffin, G.F., Pickup, G. 1995The stewardship of arid Australia: ecology and landscape managementJ. Environ. Manage.43195217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murchison Land Conservation District Committee and the Ecosystem Management Unit2002The Murchison River Project: Pastoralists restoring health to the Murchison River catchmentNicolson, S.Wilcox, D.G. eds. Shifting Camp: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Australian Rangeland Society ConferenceAustralian Rangeland SocietyPerth Australia312313September 2002, Kalgoorlie, WA.Google Scholar
  30. Nicholls, A.O., Wallace, J.F. 2003Appendix G: Principles for monitoring Biodiversity monitoring in the rangelandsSmyth, A.James, C.Whiteman, G. eds. A Way Forwardvol. 1CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Alice SpringsNorthern Territory, Australia4950Google Scholar
  31. O’Neill, R.O., DeAngelis, D.L., Waide, J.B., Allen, T.F.H. 1986A Hierarchical Concept of EcosystemsPrinceton University PressPrinceton, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Pickett, S.T.A., Wu, J., Cadenasso, M.L. 1999Patch dynamics and the ecology of disturbed groundWalker, L.R. eds. Ecosystems of the World 16ElsevierAmsterdam707722Google Scholar
  33. Pickup, G. 1985The erosion cell – a geomorphic approach to landscape classification in range assessmentAustr. Rangeland J.7114121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pickup, G. 1989New land degradation survey techniques for arid Australia - problems and prospectsAustr. Rangeland J.117482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pringle, H.J.R., Hopkins, A.J.M. 2004Biodiversity monitoring or biodiversity management systems: which is the cart and which is the horse?Bastin, G.Walsh, D.Nicolson, S. eds. Living in the Outback. Conference Papers of the Australian Rangeland Society 13th Biennial Conference Australian Rangeland SocietyAlice Springs July 2004 Australian Rangeland SocietyAustralia195200Google Scholar
  36. Pringle, H.J.R., Landsberg, J. 2004Predicting the distribution of livestock grazing pressure in rangelandsAustral Ecol.293139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pringle, H., Tinley, K. 2001aEcological sustainability for pastoral managementJ. Agric. Western Austr.423035Google Scholar
  38. Pringle, H., Tinley, K. 2001bLandholders designing with nature: an approach to off-reserve conservation in the Gascoyne–Murchison Strategy area, Western AustraliaKununurra Department of AgricultureKununurra Western Australia4953Proceedings of the Northern Australia Beef Industry ConferenceNovember 2001Google Scholar
  39. Pringle, H.J.R., Tinley, K.L. 2003Are we overlooking critical geomorphic determinants of landscape change in Australian rangelands?Ecol. Manage. Restor.4180186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pringle, H.J.R., Tinley, K.L., Brandis, T., Hopkins, A.J.M., Lewis, M., Taylor, L. 2003The Gascoyne–Murchison Strategy: A people-centred approach to conservation in arid AustraliaCD distributed by International Rangelands Congress DurbanSouth AfricaProceedings of the 2003 International Rangelands Congress, July 2003, Durban, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  41. Purvis, J.R. 1986Nurture the land: my philosophies of pastoral management in central AustraliaAustr. Rangeland J.8110117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryerson, D.E., Parmenter, R.R. 2001Vegetation change following removal of keystone herbivores from desert grasslands in New MexicoJ. Veget. Sci.12167180Google Scholar
  43. Smyth, A.K., James, C.D. 2004Characteristics of Australia’s rangelands and key design issues for monitoring biodiversityAustral Ecol.29315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tinley K.L. 1977. Framework of the Gorongoza ecosystem, Mozambique D.Sc. (Ecology) Thesis University of Pretoria, Pretoria South Africa, pp. 198Google Scholar
  45. Tinley, K.L. 1982The influence of soil moisture balance on ecosystem patterns in southern AfricaHuntley, B.J.Walker, B.H. eds. Ecological Studies, Volume 42: Ecology of Tropical SavannasSpringer-VerlagNew York, USA175192Google Scholar
  46. Tinley, K.L. 1987Achieving a balance between long and short term researchSaunders, D.A.Saunders, G.W.Burbidge, A.A.Hopkins, A.J.M. eds. Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native VegetationSurrey Beatty and Sons Pty LtdSydney, NSW, Australia347350Google Scholar
  47. Tinley, K. 2001Scrub encroachment of productive grasslands: soil moisture balanceKununurra, Department of AgricultureKununurra, Western Australia1116Proceedings of the Northern Australia Beef Industry Conference, November 2001Google Scholar
  48. Tinley, K.L., Pringle, H.J.R. 2002What is the EMU Exercise?Nicolson, S.Wilcox, D.G. eds. Shifting CampAustralian Rangeland SocietyPerth, Australia349350Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Australian Rangeland Society Conference, September 2002, Kalgoorlie, WAGoogle Scholar
  49. Tongway, D.J., Hindley, N.L. 2004Landscape function analysis manualPublished on CD by CSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsCanberra Australiaprocedures for Monitoring and Assessing Landscapes with Special Reference to Minesites and Rangelands. Version 3.1.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, I.W. 1998Monitoring Western Australian shrublands; what are the expectations of change?Range Manage. Newslett.199815Google Scholar
  51. Watson, I.W., Westoby, M., Holm, A.McR. 1997Demography of two shrub species from an arid grazed ecosystem in Western Australia, 1983–1993J. Ecol.85815832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, I., Novelly, P. 2004Making the biodiversity monitoring system sustainable: design issues for large-scale monitoring systemsAustral Ecol.291630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson, I., Thomas, P. 2003Monitoring shows improvement in the Gascoyne–Murchison rangelandsRange Manage. Newslett.20031114Google Scholar
  54. Wilcox, D.G., McKinnon, E.A. 1972A Report on the Condition of the Gascoyne Catchment, Western AustraliaDepartment of Agriculture, Western AustraliaPerth, Western Australia, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu, J. 1999Hierachy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladderCan. J. Remote Sensing25367380Google Scholar
  56. Wu, J., David, J.L. 2002A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applicationsEcol. Model.153726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu, J., Loucks, O.L. 1995From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecologyQuart. Rev. Biol.70439466CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh J. R. Pringle
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Ian W. Watson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ken L. Tinley
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Management of Arid EnvironmentsDepartment of Agriculture Western Australia and Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Hugh J. R. PringleKalgoorlieAustralia
  3. 3.Ian W. WatsonNorthamAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Conservation and Land ManagementWannerooAustralia
  5. 5.Hugh J. R. PringleCottesloeAustralia

Personalised recommendations