Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 477–483 | Cite as

Landscape Fragmentation and Ice Storm Damage in Eastern Ontario Forests

  • J. Pasher
  • D. J. King


With return times between 20 and 100 years, ice storms are a primary disturbance type for temperate forests of eastern North America. Many studies have been conducted at the forest patch and plot scales to examine relations between damage and variables describing site, composition and structure. This paper presents results from a landscape scale study of fragmentation relations with damage in eastern Ontario forests. Data previously collected for two independent and spatially non-overlapping patch level damage studies were used. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) was used to analyse relations between damage and fragmentation metrics representing patch isolation, edge density, and the relative size and distribution of patches in the landscape. The metrics were applied using spatial extents of 1 × 1 km and 4 × 4 km, following analyses of the variability of numbers of patches and of the lacunarity of forest patterns over a range of extents. The results showed that patch isolation, as measured by the mean Euclidean distance between patches (ENN) was significantly related to damage.


Damage Disturbance Fragmentation metrics General linear model Ice storm Lacunarity Landscape extent Temperate forest 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allain, C., Cloitre, M. 1991Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal setsPhys. Rev.4435523558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruederle, L.P., Stearns, F.W. 1985Ice storm damage to a southern Wisconsin mesic forestBull. Torrey Bot. Club112167175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butson C. and King D.J. 2005. Lacunarity analysis to determine optimum extents for sample-based spatial information extraction from high-resolution forest imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Charbonneau N.C. 2003. Influence of canopy cover and landscape structure on proportion of alien and shade-intolerant plant species in forest sites. M.Sc. Thesis Department of Biology Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, M.R.T. 2000Lacunarity analysis of spatial pattern: A comparisonLandscape Ecol.15467478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Environment Canada. 1998. The worst ice storm in Canadian history.
  7. Foster, D.R., Knight, D.H., Franklin, J.F. 1998Landscape patterns and legacies resulting from largeinfrequent forest disturbancesEcosystems1497510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauer, R.J., Hruska, M.C., Dawson, J.O. 1994Trees and Ice Storms: The Development of Ice Storms – Resistant Urban Tree Populations. Special Publication 94–1Department of Forestry, Univesrity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana IL1261801Google Scholar
  9. Jaeger, J.A.G. 2000Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentationLandscape Ecol.15115130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, D.J., Olthof, I., Pellikka, P.K.E., Seed, E.D., Butson, C. 2005Modelling and mapping forest ice storm damage using remote sensing and environmental dataNat. Hazards35321342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lautenschlager, R.A., Nielsen, C. 1999Ontario’s forest science efforts following the 1998 ice stormForest. Chronicle75633641Google Scholar
  12. Lemon, P.C. 1961Forest ecology of ice stormsBull. Torrey Bot. Club882129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C. and Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: Scholar
  14. Millward, A.A., Kraft, C.E. 2004Physical influences of landscape on a large-extent ecological disturbance: the northeastern North American ice storm of 1998Landscape Ecol.1999111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olthof, I., King, D.J., Lautenschlager, R.A. 2004Mapping deciduous forest ice storm damage using Landsat and environmental dataRemote Sens. Environ.89484496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pellikka, P., Seed, E.D., King, D.J. 2000Modelling deciduous forest ice storm damage using aerial CIR imagery and hemispheric photographyCan. J. Remote Sens.26394405Google Scholar
  17. Plotnick, R.E., Gardner, R.H., O’Neill, R.V. 1993Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape textureLandscape Ecol.8201211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Proulx, O.J., Greene, D.F. 2001The relationship between ice thickness and northern hardwood tree damage during ice stormsCan. J. Forest Res.3117581767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rhoads, A.G., Hamburg, S.P., Fahey, S.P., Siccama, T.J., Hane, T.G., Battles, E.N., Cogbill, J., Randall, C.J., Wilson, G. 2002Effects of an intense ice storm on the structure of a northern hardwood forestCan. J. Forest Res.3217631775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, K.T., Shortle, W.C. 1998Will Winter Storm Injury Affect Hardwood Quality and Maple Sap Production Ice Storm 1998, Information Sheet #2Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest ServiceDurham, NH2Google Scholar
  21. Smith, W.H. 1998Relation to disease and decay, In Irland L.C.: Ice Storm 1998 and the forests of the NortheastJ. Forest963240Google Scholar
  22. Turner, M.G. 1989Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on processAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.20171197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner, M.G., Dale, V.H. 1998Comparing large infrequent disturbances: what have we learned?Ecosystems1493496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Dyke O.R.P.F. Landmark Consulting. 1999. A Literature Review of Ice Storm Impacts on Forests in Eastern North America. SCSS Technical Report #112.Google Scholar
  25. Wear D.N. and Greis J.G. 2002. The Southern Forest Resource Assessment Summary Report.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations