Skip to main content
Log in

Landscape-level movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus): effects of habitat patch structure and topography

  • Research article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus) in northeastern Oregon, USA. Movement vectors at 449 locations over a 7762 ha area were calculated based on 16,724 sequential observations of 94 female elk-year combinations during spring (15 April–14 May) 1993, 1995, 1996. We calculated movement vectors at the start of morning and evening feeding bouts (0500, 1900 h) and during periods of least activity (0100, 1500 h). Here, we measured characteristics of habitat patches (habitat type, mean patch size, coefficient of variation in patch size, edge density, mean shape index, and mean nearest neighbor) at two levels of habitat grain (eight habitat types, two habitat types) and at three spatial scales (250, 500, and 1000 m) around each movement vector. We also measured topographic features around each vector including distance to nearest stream, direction of drainage, elevation, slope, and convexity (a measure of ridge top vs. valley bottom land form). We used mixed models adjusted for positive spatial correlation among vectors to examine the relationship between vector length, or speed of movement, and habitat patch characteristics, and between vector direction and topographic features. Speed of movements by elk were not related to characteristics of habitat patches that we measured. The direction of movement, however, was dependent on topography. Elk were more likely to move parallel to major drainages than perpendicular to them. Furthermore, elk were less likely to move perpendicular to drainages when close to the nearest stream, in valley bottoms vs. ridge tops, and on steep slopes. The dendritic nature of movements by elk with respect to topography may help elucidate ecosystem processes such as nutrient flows, nutrient cycling, and successional trajectories of plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A.A. Ager B.K. Johnson J.W. Kern J.G. Kie (2003) ArticleTitleDaily and seasonal movements and habitat use of Rocky Mountain elk and mule deer Journal of Mammalogy 84 1076–1088 Occurrence Handle10.1644/BBa-020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Augustine S.J. McNaughton (1998) ArticleTitleUngulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance Journal of Wildlife Management 62 1165–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Beier D.R. McCullough (1990) ArticleTitleFactors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use Wildlife Monographs 109 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Bergman J.A. Schefer S.N. Luttich (2000) ArticleTitleCaribou movement as a correlated random walk Oecologia 123 364–374

    Google Scholar 

  • G.B. Bowman L.D. Harris (1980) ArticleTitleEffect of spatial heterogeneity on ground-nest predation Journal of Wildlife Management 44 806–813

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Bowyer (1981) ArticleTitleActivity, movementand distribution of Roosevelt elk during rut Journal of Mammalogy 62 574–582

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Bowyer K.M. Stewart S.A. Wolfe G.M. Blundell K.L. Lehmkuhl P.J. Joy T.J. McDonough J.G. Kie (2002) ArticleTitleAssessing sexual segregation in deer Journal of Wildlife Management 66 536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Brillinger H.K. Preisler A.A. Ager J.G. Kie (2001) The use of potential functions in modelling animal movement A.K.Md.E. Saleh (Eds) Data Analysis from Statistical Foundations Nova Science Publishers Inc. Huntington, New York, USA 369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Brillinger H.K. Preisler A.A. Ager J.G. Kie (2004) ArticleTitleAn exploratory data analysis (EDA) of the paths of moving animals Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 122 43–63 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jspi.2003.06.016 Occurrence HandleMR2057913

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Brillinger H.K. Preisler A.A. Ager J.G. Kie B.S. Stewart (2002) ArticleTitleEmploying stochastic differential equations to model wildlife motion Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society 33 93–116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005740200021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.P. Burnham D.R. Anderson (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach Springer New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Carter J.T. Finn (1999) ArticleTitleMOAB: a spatially explicitindividual-based expert system for creating animal foraging models Ecological Modeling 119 29–41 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00044-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Cleveland E. Grosse W.M. Shyu (1992) Generalized additive models J.M. Chambers T.J. Hastie (Eds) Statistical Models in S Pacific GroveWadsworth Pacific GroveCaliforniaUSA 309–376

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H. Clutton-Brock P.H. Harvey (1978) ArticleTitleMammals, resources, and reproductive strategies Nature 273 191–195 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSeC2MnksVw%3D Occurrence Handle347308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • E.K. Cole M.D. Pope R.G. Anthony (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of road management on movement and survival of Roosevelt elk Journal of Wildlife Management 61 1115–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Dana W. Fowle D. Hindman (1989) Automated animal-tracking system: tracking elk with retransmitted Loran-C J.M. Buekers (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th Annual Technical Symposium of the International LORAN Association Santa Barbara CaliforniaUSA 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Dempster E. Pollard (1986) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity, stochasticity, and the detection of density dependence in animal populations Oikos 46 413–416

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Dunning B.J. Danielson H.R. Pulliam (1992) ArticleTitleEcological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes Oikos 65 169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameESRI (2001) ARC GIS Version 8.1 Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. Redlands, CaliforniaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Findholt B.K. Johnson L.D. Bryant J.W. Thomas (1996) ArticleTitleCorrections for position bias of a Loran-C radio telemetry system using DGPS Northwest Science 70 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Focardi P.M. Marcellini P. Montanaro (1996) ArticleTitleDo ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns Journal of Animal Ecology 65 606–620

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T.T. Forman (1995) Land Mosaics – The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions Cambridge University Press CambridgeUnited Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • S.V. Good D.F. Williams K. Ralls R.C. Fleischer (1997) ArticleTitlePopulation structure of Dipodomys ingens (Heteromyidae): the role of spatial heterogeneity in maintaining genetic diversity Evolution 51 1296–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Green G.D. Bear (1990) ArticleTitleSeasonal cycles and daily activity patterns of Rocky Mountain elk Journal of Wildlife Management 54 272–279

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Gross C. Zank N.T. Hobbs D.E. Spallinger (1995) ArticleTitleMovement rules for herbivores in spatially heterogeneous environments: responses to small scale pattern Landscape Ecology 10 209–217 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00129255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Grünbaum (1998) ArticleTitleUsing spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes American Naturalist 151 97–115 Occurrence Handle10.1086/286105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.J. Hastie (1992) Generalized additive models J.M. Chambers T.J. Hastie (Eds) Statistical Models in S Wadsworth Pacific GroveCaliforniaUSA 195–247

    Google Scholar 

  • N.T. Hobbs (1996) ArticleTitleModification of ecosystems by ungulates Journal of Wildlife Management 60 95–713

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Holt (1984) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species American Naturalist 124 377–406 Occurrence Handle10.1086/284280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameInsightful Corporation (2001) S-Plus 6 for Windows user’s guide Insightful Corporation SeattleWashington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Ives (1995) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity and host–parasitoid population dynamics: do we need to study behavior? Oikos 74 366–376

    Google Scholar 

  • B.K. Johnson J.W. Kern M.J. Wisdom S.L. Findholt J.G. Kie (2000) ArticleTitleResource selection and spatial separation of elk and mule deer in spring Journal of Wildlife Management 64 685–697

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Kie R.T. Bowyer B.B. Boroski M.C. Nicholson E.R. Loft (2002) ArticleTitleLandscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer Ecology 83 530–544

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Kie R.T. Bowyer K.M. Stewart (2003) Ungulates in western forests: habitat requirements, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes C.J. Zabel R.G. Anthony (Eds) Mammal Community Dynamics in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America: Management and Conservation Cambridge University Press New York, USA 296–340

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Kie J.F. Lehmkuhl (2001) ArticleTitleHerbivory by wild and domestic ungulates in the Intermountain West Northwest Science 75 55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kvamme (1988) Development and testing of quantitative models J. Judge L. Sebastian (Eds) Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Methods, and Applications of Archaeological Predictive Modeling US Department of InteriorBureau of Land Management Service Center DenverColoradoUSA 325–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckenby D.A. 1984. Elk use and availability of cover and forage habitat components in the Blue Mountains, northeast Oregon, 1976–1982. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Research Report14. pp. 1–40.

  • S.L. Lima P.A. Zollner (1996) ArticleTitleTowards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 131–135 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0169-5347(96)81094-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Littell G.A. Milliken W.W. Stroup R.D. Wolfinger (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North CarolineUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Lloyd R.M. May (1996) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity in epidemic models Journal of Theroetical Biology 179 1–11 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.1996.0042 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1MjltlA%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. McCorquodale (1993) ArticleTitleWinter foraging behavior of elk in the shrub-steppe of Washington Journal of Wildlife Management 57 881–890

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USA.

  • S.R. Moe P. Wegge (1994) ArticleTitleSpacing behavior and habitat use of axis deer (Axis axis) in lowland Nepal Canadian Journal of Zoology 72 1735–1744

    Google Scholar 

  • E.M. Molvar R.T. Bowyer V. Van Ballenberghe (1993) ArticleTitleMoose herbivory, browse quality, and nutrient cycling in an Alaskan treeline community Oecologia 94 472–479

    Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Moorcroft M.A. Lewis R.L. Crabtree (1999) ArticleTitleHome range analysis using a mechanistic home range model Ecology 80 1656–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • S.W. Pacala J. Roughgarden (1982) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity and interspecific competition Theoretical Population Biology 21 92–113 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0040-5809(82)90008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.L. Parker C.T. Robbins T.A. Hanley (1984) ArticleTitleEnergy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk Journal of Wildlife Management 48 474–488

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pastor R.J. Naiman (1992) ArticleTitleSelective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forests American Naturalist 139 690–705 Occurrence Handle10.1086/285353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preisler H.K., Ager A.A., Johnson B.K. and Kie J.G. 2004. Modeling wildlife movements using stochastic differential equations. Environmetrics 15: 643–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisler H.K., Brillinger D.R., Ager A.A. and Kie J.G. 1999. Analysis of animal movement using telemetry and GIS data. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Volume on Statistics of the Environmentpp. 100–105.

  • Preisler H.K., Brillinger D.R., Ager A.A., Kie J.G. and Akers R.P. 2001. Stochastic differential equations: a tool for studying animal movement. Proceedings of the IUFRO 4.11 Conference Session on Forest Biometry Modelling and Information Science 26–29 June 2001, GreenwichUnited Kingdompp. 1–9. (http://cms1.gre.ac.uk/conferences/iufro/proceedings/ preisler4.pdf).

  • W.R. Rice (1989) ArticleTitleAnalyzing tables of statistical tests Evolution 43 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Roth (1976) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity Ecology 57 773–782

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Rowland L.D. Bryant B.K. Johnson J.H. Noyes M.J. Wisdom J.W. Thomas (1997) The Starkey Project: history, facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate research US Department of AgricultureForest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT User’s GuideVersion 8 SAS InstituteInc. Cary, North CarolinaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Skovlin (1967) Fluctuations in forage quality on summer range in the Blue Mountains US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Skovlin (1982) Habitat requirements and evaluations J.W. Thomas D.E. Toweill (Eds) Elk of North America Stackpole Books Harrisburg, PennsylvaniaUSA 369–413

    Google Scholar 

  • N.C. Stenseth (1980) ArticleTitleSpatial heterogeneity and population stability: some evolutionary consequences Oikos 35 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Stewart R.T. Bowyer J.G. Kie N.J. Cimon B.K. Johnson (2002) ArticleTitleTemporospatial distributions of elk, mule deerand cattle: resource partitioning and competitive displacement Journal of Mammalogy 83 229–244 Occurrence Handle10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0229:TDOEMD>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Strohmeyer J.M. Peek (1996) ArticleTitleWapiti home range and movement patterns in a sagebrush desert Northwest Science 70 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Turchin (1998) Quantitative Analysis of Movement Sinauer SunderlandMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Turner Y. Wu W.H. Romme L.L. Wallace (1993) ArticleTitleA landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates Ecological Modeling 69 163–184 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3800(93)90026-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vore E.M. Schmidt (2001) ArticleTitleMovements of female elk during calving season in northwest Montana Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 720–725

    Google Scholar 

  • K.A. White J.D. Murray M.A. Lewis (1996) ArticleTitleWolf-deer interactions: a mathematical model Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263 299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Wu B.L. Li T.A. Springer W.H. Neill (2000) ArticleTitleModeling animal movement as a persistent random walk in two dimensions: expected magnitude of net displacement Ecological Modeling 132 115–124 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00309-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Zollner S.L. Lima (1999) ArticleTitleSearch strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements Ecology 80 1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Kie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kie, J., Ager, A. & Bowyer, R. Landscape-level movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus): effects of habitat patch structure and topography. Landscape Ecol 20, 289–300 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-3165-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-3165-3

Keywords

Navigation