Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 555–566 | Cite as

The Effects of Land-use and Landscape Structure on Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Breeding Success in Southern England, U.K.

  • Georgina Bond
  • Niall G Burnside
  • Daniel J Metcalfe
  • Dawn M Scott
  • John Blamire
Research Article


To aid effective conservation and management there is a need to understand the effect of landscape on species ecology. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of landscape parameters on breeding success of barn owls throughout the Rother and Arun River catchments, Sussex, UK. We used a Geographic Information System to describe the habitat mosaic and landscape structure within an estimated home range area of 3 km2 around 85 artificial nest box sites. Results showed that land cover was less heterogeneous at successful sites, with home ranges dominated by a few habitat types of regular patch shapes. Unsuccessful nesting sites had significantly more improved grassland, suburban land and wetlands than successful sites. Cluster analysis and Principle Components Analysis was used to assess the similarity of the habitat mosaic within these areas and pellet analysis was undertaken to assess barn owl diet and prey availability. Ten prey species were recovered from pellets, field vole (Microtus agrestis), common shrews (Sorex araneus) and house mice (Mus musculus) making up nearly 90% of recoveries. However box sites varied in relative proportions of small mammal, and hence prey availability. Results indicated that land use and landscape structure can affect breeding success in barn owls. Higher levels of poor quality small mammal habitat were associated with unsuccessful sites. However, at a landscape scale, the habitat mosaic across the study area lacked variation, limiting analysis and clear correlations between habitat type and positive breeding success, suggesting that a finer scale was needed in future studies utilising this approach.


Barn owl Cluster analysis GIS Habitat mosaic Landscape structure Nest box Pellet analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andries, A.M., Gulink, H., Herremans, M. 1994Spatial modelling of the barn owl habitat using landscape characteristics from SPOT dataEcography17278287Google Scholar
  2. Barr, C.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Clarke, R.T., Fuller, R.M., Furse, M.T., Gillespie, M., Groom, G.B., Hallam, C.J., Hornung, M., Howard, D.C., Ness, M.K.J. 1993Countryside Survey 1990 Main ReportDepartment of the EnvironmentUKGoogle Scholar
  3. Blamire, J., Roberts, G. 2001Review of the Arun and Rother Barn Owl Project 1995–2001South Downs Conservation Board and West Sussex County CouncilUKGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunn, D.S., Warburton, A.B., Wilson, R.D.S. 1982The Barn OwlPoyserUKGoogle Scholar
  5. Environment Agency. http://www.environment– Scholar
  6. Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M. 2001Cluster Analysis4ArnoldLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Farina, A. 1998Principles and Methods in Landscape EcologyChapman and HallLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Firbank, L.G., Arnold, H.R., Eversham, B.C., Mountford, J.O., Radford, G.L., Telfer, M.G., Treweek, J.R., Webb, N.R.C., Wells, T.C.E. 1993Managing Set-Aside Land for WildlifeITE research publication No.7, HMSOUKGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman, R. 1995Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and RegionsCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler, J., Cohen, L., Jarvis, P. 1999Practical Statistics for Field BiologyWileyChichesterWest Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Glue, D.E. 1974Food of the Barn OwlBird Study21200210Google Scholar
  12. Green, B.H. 1990Agricultural intensification and the loss of habitatspecies and amenity of British grasslands: a review of historical change and assessment of future prospectsGrass Forage Sci.45365372Google Scholar
  13. Harris, S., Wollard, T. 1990The dispersal of mammals in agricultural habitats in BritainBunce, R.G.H.Howard, D.C. eds. Species Dispersal in Agricultural HsssabitatsBelhaven PressUK159188Google Scholar
  14. ITE.2000Land Cover 2000 DataInstitute of Terrestrial EcologyUnited KingdomGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacob, J. 2003The response of small mammal populations to floodingMamm. Biol.68102111Google Scholar
  16. Jeanneret P., Shupbach B., Lips A., Harding J., Steiger J., Waldburger M., Bigler F. and Fried P.M. 1999. Biodiversity patterns in cultivated landscapes: modelling and mapping with GIS and multivariate statistics. In: Heterogeneity in Landscape Ecology. Proceedings of the 1999 annual International Association for Landscape Ecology (UK) conference. UK.Google Scholar
  17. Kent, M., Coker, P. 1992Vegetation Description and Analysis a Practical ApproachJohn Wiley & SonsChichesterUKGoogle Scholar
  18. Love, R., Webbon, C., Glue, D.E., Harris, S. 2000Changes in the food of British barn owls (Tyto alba) between 1974 and 1997Mamm. Rev.30107129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marti, C.D. 1999Natal and breeding dispersal in barn owlsJ. Raptor Res.33118189Google Scholar
  20. Martinez, J.A., Lopez, G. 1995Dispersal and causes of mortality in the barn owl (Tyto alba) in SpainJ. Ornithol.14093100Google Scholar
  21. Meek, W.R., Burman, P.J., Nowakowski, M., Sparks, T.H., Burman, N.J. 2003Barn owl release in lowland southern England – a 21 year studyBiol. Conserv.109271282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. la Pena, N., Butet, A., Delettre, Y., Paillat, G., Morant, P., Du, L., Burel, F. 2003Response of the small mammal community to changes in western French agricultural landscapesLandscape Ecol.18265278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Percival, S.M. 1990Population trends in British barn and tawny owls in relation to environmental changeBTO Report No.57BTOUKGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramsar 2003. Ramsar Profiles UK: The Arun Valley, Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, Google Scholar
  25. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 1999. The Arun Valley. Scholar
  26. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. 2003. Barn Owls. Google Scholar
  27. Salvati, L., Ranazzi, L., Manganaro, A. 2002Habitat preferences, breeding success and diet of barn owls in Rome: urban versus rural territoriesJ. Raptor Res.36224228Google Scholar
  28. Shawyer, C.R. 1987The Barn Owl of the British Isles: its PastPresent and FutureThe Hawk and Owl TrustUKGoogle Scholar
  29. Shawyer, C.R. 1994The Barn OwlHamlyn Species GuidesHong Kong, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  30. Shawyer, C.R., Shawyer, V.M. 1995An Investigation of the Barn Owl Population Within the Arun and Western Rother CatchmentsHawk and Owl TrustUKGoogle Scholar
  31. Stoate, C., Boatman, N.D., Borralho, C., Carvalho, R., de Snoo, G.R., Eden, D. 2001Ecological impacts of arable intensification in EuropeJ. Environ. Manage.63337365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sussex Downs Conservation Board (SDCB) http://www. Google Scholar
  33. Tattersall, F.H., Avundo, A.E., Manley, W.J., Hart, B.J., Macdonald, D.W. 2000Managing set-aside for field volesBiol. Conserv.96123128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tattersall, F.H., Macdonald, D.W., Manley, W.J., Gates, S., Feber, R., Hart, B.J. 1997Small mammals on one-year set-asideActa Theriologica42329334Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, I.R. 1994Barn Owls. Predator-prey Relationships and ConservationCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Tew, T.E. 1994Farmland Hedgerow: HabitatCorridors or IrrelevantWatt, T.A.Buckley, G.P. eds. Hedgerow Management and Nature Conservation, British Ecological SocietyWye College PressUK8094Google Scholar
  37. Tome, R., Valkama, J. 2001Seasonal variation in the abundance and habitat use of barn owls (Tyto alba) on lowland farmlandOrnis Fennica78109118Google Scholar
  38. Toms, M.P., Crick, H.Q.P., Shawyer, C.R. 2001The status of breeding barn owls (Tyto alba) in the UK 1995–1997Bird Study482337Google Scholar
  39. Valkama, J., Korpimaki, E., Tolonen, P. 1995Habitat utilisation, diet and reproductive success in the kestrel in a temporally and spatially heterogeneous environmentOrnis Fennica724961Google Scholar
  40. Waite, S. 2000Statistical Ecology: A Practical GuidePrentice HallHarlow, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. Webster, J.A. 1973Seasonal variation in mammal contents of barn owl castingsBird Study32122131Google Scholar
  42. West Sussex County Council. 2003. Phase 1 Habitat Surveys. 1:10,000. West Sussex County Council, Chichester.Google Scholar
  43. Widen, P. 1994Habitat quality for raptors: a field experimentJ. Avian Biol.25219223Google Scholar
  44. Yalden, D.W., Morris, P.A. 1990The Analysis of Owl PelletsThe Mammal SocietyUKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgina Bond
    • 1
  • Niall G Burnside
    • 1
  • Daniel J Metcalfe
    • 2
  • Dawn M Scott
    • 2
  • John Blamire
    • 3
  1. 1.School of the Environment, BERGUniversity of BrightonMoulsecoomb, BrightonUK
  2. 2.Biology Division, BERGUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK
  3. 3.Rother Valley ProjectMidhurstUK

Personalised recommendations