Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 659–674 | Cite as

Mental Health Court Outcomes: A Comparison of Re-Arrest and Re-Arrest Severity Between Mental Health Court and Traditional Court Participants

  • Marlee E. Moore
  • Virginia Aldigé Hiday
Original Article


Mental health courts have been proliferating across the country since their establishment in the late 1990’s. Although numerous advocates have proclaimed their merit, only few empirical studies have evaluated their outcomes. This paper evaluates the effect of one mental health court on criminal justice outcomes by examining arrests and offense severity from one year before to one year after entry into the court, and by comparing mental health court participants to comparable traditional criminal court defendants on these measures. Multivariate models support the prediction that mental health courts reduce the number of new arrests and the severity of such re-arrests among mentally ill offenders. Similar analysis of mental health court completers and non-completers supports the prediction that a “full dose” of mental health treatment and court monitoring produce even fewer re-arrests.


Mental health court Diversion Coerced treatment 



The authors wish to thank Stacy de Coster, Rodney Engen, Anne Schiller, Catherine Zimmer, Heathcote Wales, and Kathleen Hartford for their insightful criticism and suggestions.


  1. Bond, G. R., McGrew, J. H., & Fekete, D. M. (1995). Assertive outreach for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 4–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boothroyd, R. A., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Petrila, J. (2003). The Broward mental health court: Process, outcomes and service utilization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 55–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broner, N., Lattimore, P. K., Cowell, A. J., & Schlenger, W. E. (2004). Effects of diversion on adults with co-occurring mental illness and substance use: Outcomes from a national multi-site study. Behavior Sciences and the Law, 22, 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2004). National Assessment of Structured Sentencing. (Available at Scholar
  6. Christy, A., Poythress, N. G., Boothroyd, R. A., Petrila, J., & Mehra, S. (2005). Evaluating the efficiency and community safety goals of the Broward County mental health court. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cosden, M., Ellens, J., Schnell, J., Yamini-Diouf, Y., & Wolfe, M. (2003). Evaluation of a mental health court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 415–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cosden, M., Ellens, J., Schnell, J., & Yamini-Diouf, Y. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 199–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditton, P. M. (1999). Mental health treatment of inmates and probationers. Bureau of Justice Special Reports, U.S. Department of Justice, NCJ: 174463.Google Scholar
  10. Goldkamp, J., & Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Bureau of Justice Assistance NCJ: 182504.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, P. A., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1285–1289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hiday, V. A. (2003). Outpatient commitment: The state of empirical research on its outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 9, 8–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hiday, V. A., Moore, M. E., Lamoureaux, M., & de Magistri, J. (2005). North Carolina's mental health court. Popular Government, 70(3), 24–29.Google Scholar
  14. Hiday, V. A., Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Borum, R., & Wagner, H. R. (2002). Impact of outpatient commitment on victimization of persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1403–1411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiday, V. A., & Wales, H. W. (2003). Civil commitment and arrests. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 16, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamb, H., Weinberger, L., & Reston-Parham, C. (1996). Court intervention to address the mental health needs of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services, 47(3), 275–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. McGaha, A., Boothroyd, R. A., Poythress, N. G., Petrila, J., & Ort, R. G. (2002). Lessons from the Broward County mental health court evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2005, July). Evaluation of a Mental Health Court: Recidivism Offense Outcomes for Matched Samples. Paper presented at the International Congress of Law and Mental Health, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  20. Morris, S., Steadman, J., & Veysey, B. (1997). Mental health services in United States jails: A survey of innovative practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  21. Mueser, K. T., Corrigan, P. W., Hilton, D. W., Tanzman, B., Schaub, A.,Gingerich, S., et al. (2002). Ilness management and recovery: A review of the research. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1272–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission. (2004). Structured Sentencing Training and Reference Manual. (Available at manual2004.pdf)Google Scholar
  24. Peters, R., Haas, A., & Hunt, W. (2001). Treatment ‘dosage’ effects in drug court programs. In J. Hennessy & N. Pallone (Eds.), Drug Courts in Operation: Current Research. NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, R. H., & Osher, F. C. (2004). Co-occurring Disorders and Specialty Courts (2nd ed.) Delmar, NY: The National Gains Center.Google Scholar
  26. Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. A. (2000). Preliminary observations from an evaluation of the Broward County Florida mental health court. Court Review (fall), 20–28.Google Scholar
  27. Poythress, N. G., Petrila, J., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. A. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in mental health court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 517–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Petrila, J., & Griffin, P. A. (2005). The second generation of mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 11(4), 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaefer, N., & Stefancic, A. (2003). Alternative to prison programs for the mentally ill offender. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38(2), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. StataCorp. (2003). Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  31. Steadman, H. J., Cocozza, J., & Veysey, B. (1999). Comparing outcomes for diverted and nondiverted jail detainees with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 23(6), 615–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steadman, H. J., Davidson, S., & Brown, C. (2001). Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services, 52, 457–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steadman, H. J., Deane, M., Morrissey, J., Westcott, M., Salasin, S., & Shapiro, S. (1999). A SAMHSA research initiative assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for mentally ill persons. Psychiatric Services, 50(12), 1620–1623.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Steadman, H. J., Morris, S., & Dennis, D. (1995). The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community based services: A profile of programs. American Journal of Public Health, 85(12), 1630–1635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Griffin, P., Petrila, J., & Monahan, J. (2005). From referral to disposition: Case processing in seven mental health courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 215–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swartz, J., Lurigio, A., & Slomka, S. (1996). The impact of IMPACT: An assessment of the effectiveness of a jail-based treatment program. Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 553–573.Google Scholar
  37. Teplin, L. A. (1990). The prevalence of serious mental disorder among male urban jail detainees: Comparison with the epidemiologic catchment area program. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 663–669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., & McClelland, G. M. (1996). The prevalence of psychiatric disorder among incarcerated women: 1. Pretrial jail detainees. Annals of General Psychiatry, 53, 505–512.Google Scholar
  39. Torrey, E. F. (1995). Jails and prisons: America's new mental hospitals. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1611–1613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trupin, E., & Richards, H. (2003). Seattle's mental health courts: Early indicators of effectiveness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 33–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ulmer, J. (2001). Intermediate sanctions: A comparative analysis of the probability and severity of recidivism. Sociological Inquiry, 71(2), 164–193.Google Scholar
  42. Wahlbeck, K., Cheine, M., Essali, A., & Adams, C. (1999). Evidence of clozapine's effectiveness in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 990–999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, A., Hanrahan, P., Luchins, D., & Lurigio, A. (2001). Mental health courts and the complex issue of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 477–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wexler, H., Falkin, G., & Lipton, D. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71–92.Google Scholar
  45. Ziguras, S. J., & Stuart, G. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychiatric Services, 51, 1410–1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations