Violent Sex Offenses: How are They Best Measured from Official Records?
- 82 Downloads
In the United States, sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment statutes generally require assessment of an offender's risk of subsequent sexual violence. Current actuarial methods for predicting sexual reoffending were actually designed to predict something else—charges or convictions for offenses deemed sexual based on information obtained from police “rapsheets” alone. This study examined the referral and past offenses of 177 sex offenders. Results showed that police rapsheets (and data based on them) underestimated the number and severity of sexually motivated violent offenses for which sex offenders were actually apprehended. Rapsheet violent offenses seemed a more accurate index of the conduct addressed by SVP legislation than were rapsheet sex offenses. We suggest that, when evaluating sex offenders for SVP status, actuarial instruments designed to predict violent recidivism (as measured by rapsheet violent reoffenses) might be preferable to those designed to predict sexual recidivism (as measured by rapsheet sexual reoffenses).
KeywordsSex offenders Risk assessment Sexual recidivism Violent recidivism
We wish to thank Z. Hilton, M. Lalumière, and M. Seto for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
- Arizona Criminal Code (2006). Title 13-118.Google Scholar
- Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 13, 118–126.Google Scholar
- Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Du Mont, J., McGreggor, M. T., Myhr, T. L., & Miller, K. L. (2000). Predicting legal outcomes from medicolegal findings: An examination of sexual assault in two jurisdictions. Journal of Women's Health and Law, 1, 219–233.Google Scholar
- Hanson, K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa: department of the Solicitor General (1997-04).Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada (2004-02).Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. K., Steffy, R. A., & Gauthier, R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 656–662.Google Scholar
- Langevin, R., Curnoe, S., Fedoroff, P., Bennett, R., Langevin, M., Peever, C., et al. (2004). Lifetime sex offender recidivism: A 25-year follow-up study. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 46, 531–552.Google Scholar
- Pfaus, J. G. (1999). Revisiting the concept of sexual motivation. Annual Review of Sex Research. Retrieved from www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3778/is_199901/ai_n8834060Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Seto, M. C. (2005). Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 156–167.Google Scholar
- State of Washington v. Alvin Chester Wible (2002). 27164-8-II, (Ct. Ap. WA).Google Scholar
- State of Washington v. Gregory O. Thomas (1999). 67168-1 (S. Ct. WA).Google Scholar
- State of Washington v. K. N. S. (2004). 55082-9-I (Ct. Ap. WA).Google Scholar
- State of Washington v. Michael A. Halgren (1999). 662312 (S. Ct. WA).Google Scholar
- State of Washington v. Roy Donald Stout (2005) 53332-1-I (Ct. Ap. WA).Google Scholar
- West Virginia v. Dale Scott Whalen (2003) 31244, 02-F-5 (S. Ct. Ap. WV).Google Scholar