Law and Critique

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 31–56 | Cite as

‘Burqa Avenger’: Law and Religious Practices in Secular Space

  • Giorgia Baldi


The current debate over the hijab is often understood through the lens of a ‘clash of civilizations’ between a tolerant ‘secular’ ‘West’ and a chauvinist ‘religious’ ‘East’. The article argues that this polarization is the result of a specific secular semiotic understanding of religion and religious practices which is nowadays embedded in western law. In my analysis, secular’s normative assumptions, played around the control of women’s bodies and the definition of religious symbols in the public sphere, work as a marker of ‘citizenship’ and ‘racialized religious belonging’. Through women’s bodies, western/secular law creates a link between gender, religion, ethnicity and belonging which forms a specific law and religious subject. Thus, secularism emerges not as the separation between private and public, state and religion, but as the reconfiguration of religious practices and sensitivities in the public secular space through the control of the visible.


Gender Headscarf debate Power of images Secular/religious Semiotics Sovereignty Symbology Women in the Middle East 


  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2000. Veiled sentiments: Updated with a new preface: Honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. 2nd, Revised ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2001. ‘Orientalism’ and Middle East feminist studies. Feminist Studies 27 (1): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio. 2014. L’Uso Dei Corpi. Homo Sacer, IV 2 Libro. La Quarta Prosa: Neri Pozza Editore.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed, Leila. 1992. Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alvi, Anjum. 2013. Concealment and revealment. Current Anthropology 54 (2): 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Andreassen, Rikke, and Lettinga Doutje. 2011. Veiled debates: Gender and gender equality in European national narratives. In Politics, religion and gender. Framing and regulating the Muslim headscarf, ed. Sieglinde Rosenberger, and Birgit Sauer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Asad, Talal. 1993. A comment on Aijaz Ahmad’s In Theory. Public Culture 6 (1): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asad, Talal. 2001. Reading a modern classic: W.C. Smith’s ‘The meaning and end of religion’. History of Religions 40 (3): 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Asad, Talal. 2006a. French secularism and the Islamic veil affair. Hedgehog Review 8 (1/2): 93.Google Scholar
  13. Asad, Talal. 2006b. Trying to understand French secularism. In Political theologies: Public religions in a post-secular world, ed. Hent de Vries, and Lawrence E. Sullivan. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bangstad, Sindre. 2011. Saba Mahmood and anthropological feminism after virtue. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (3): 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barthes, Roland. 2006. The language of fashion, English ed. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  16. Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bodman, Herbert L., and Nayereh Esfahlani Tohidi (eds.). 1998. Women in Muslim societies: Diversity within unity. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Bomeman, John. 2014. Veiling and women’s intelligibility. In Constitutional secularism in an age of religious revival, ed. Susanna Mancini, and Michel Rosenfeld. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Butler, Judith. 2013. The sensibility of critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood. In Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech, ed. Talal Asad, Wendy Brown, Judith P. Butler, and Saba Mahmood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Butler, Judith, and Gayatri Spivak. 2007. Who sings the nation-state? Language, politics, belonging. New York: Seagull Books.Google Scholar
  22. Casanova, José. 1994. Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cavanaugh, William T. 1995. ‘A fire strong enough to consume the house’: The wars of religion and the rise of the state. Modern Theology 11 (4): 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cavanaugh, William T. 2009. The myth of religious violence: Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chehabi, Houchang E. 1993. Staging the emperor’s new clothes: Dress codes and nation-building under Reza Shah. Iranian Studies 26 (3–4): 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chemaly, Soraya. 2016. France’s Burkini ban exposes how women are still violently oppressed in the name of nationalism. Quartz. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
  27. Chrisafis, Angelique. 2008. France rejects Muslim woman over radical practice of Islam. The Guardian. Accessed 7 Dec 2016.
  28. Crouch, Gregory. 2006. Dutch immigration kit offers a revealing view. The New York Times. Accessed Dec 2016.
  29. Cumper, Peter, and Tom Lewis. 2008. ‘Taking religion seriously’? Human rights and Hijab in Europe—Some problems of adjudication. Journal of Law and Religion 24 (02): 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davary, Bahar. 2009. Miss Elsa and the veil: Honor, shame, and identity negotiations. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 25 (2): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Diamantides, Marinos. 2006. Toward a Western-Islamic conception of legalism. In Law, text, terror: Essays for Pierre Legendre, ed. Peter Goodrich, Lior Barshack, and Anton Schütz. Oxon: Glass House Press.Google Scholar
  32. Diamantides, Marinos. 2015. Constitutional theory and its limits—Reflections on comparative political theologies. Law, Culture and the Humanities 11 (1): 109–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doniger, Wendy. 2004. The woman who pretended to be who she was: Myths of self-imitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. El Guindi, Fadwa. 1999. Veil: Modesty, privacy, and resistance. Oxford: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Esmeir, Samera. 2012. Juridical humanity: A colonial history. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fadil, Nadia. 2011. Not-/unveiling as an ethical practice. Feminist Review 98 (1): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  38. Foucault, Michel. 1981. The history of sexuality. A Pelican Book. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Foucault, Michel. 1992. The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Foucault, Michel. 2002. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Goodrich, Peter. 1995. Oedipus lex: Psychoanalysis, history, law. Berkeley: University of California press.Google Scholar
  42. Goodrich, Peter. 1998. Signs taken for wonders: Community, identity, and a history of sumptuary law. Law & Social Inquiry 23 (3): 707–728.Google Scholar
  43. Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herman, Didi. 2006. ‘An unfortunate coincidence’: Jews and Jewishness in twentieth-century English judicial discourse. Journal of Law and Society 33 (2): 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1997. Eastern veiling, Western freedom? The Review of Politics 59 (03): 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2009. The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom. Princeton NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hunt, Alan. 1996. Governance of the consuming passions: A history of sumptuary law. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Husain, Mary E., and Kevin J. Ayotte. 2005. Securing Afghan women: Neocolonialism, epistemic violence, and the rhetoric of the veil. National Women’s Study Association Journal 17 (3): 112–133.Google Scholar
  49. Ismail, Salwa. 2007. Islamism, re-Islamisation and the fashioning of Muslim selves: Refiguring the public sphere. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 4 (1). Accessed 22 May 2017.
  50. Jacobsen, Christine M. 2011. Troublesome threesome: Feminism, anthropology and Muslim women’s piety. Feminist Review 98 (1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jawad, Huda. 2016. The burkini ban is misogynistic – and Western feminists are turning a blind eye, The Independent. 13 August. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
  52. Jivraj, Suhraiya. 2013. The religion of law: Race, citizenship and children’s belonging. Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jivraj, Suhraiya, and Didi Herman. 2011. It is difficult for a white judge to understand: Orientalism, racialisation, and Christianity in English child welfare cases. Accessed 22 May 2017.
  54. Jones, Stephanie, and Stewart Motha. 2015. A new nomos offshore and bodies as their own signs. Law & Literature 27 (2): 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jouili, Jeanette. 2011. Beyond emancipation: Subjectivities and ethics among women in Europe’s Islamic revival communities. Feminist Review 98 (1): 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kantorowicz, Ernst Hartwig. 1957. The king’s two bodies: A study in mediaeval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian moderns: Freedom and fetish in the mission encounter. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lister, Ruth, et al. (ed.). 2007. Gendering citizenship in Western Europe. New challenges for citizenship research in a cross-national context. University of Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lewis, Reina. 1996. Gendering orientalism: Race, femininity, and representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Lewis, Reina. 2004. Rethinking orientalism: Women, travel, and the Ottoman harem. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Macleod, Arlene Elowe. 1991. Accommodating protest: Working women, the new veiling, and change in Cairo. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Marsden, Magnus. 2007. Living Islam: Muslim religious experience in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mahmood, Saba. 2009. Religious reason and secular affect: An incommensurable divide? Critical Inquiry 35 (4): 836–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mahmood, Saba. 2012a. Religious freedom, the minority question, and geopolitics in the Middle East. Comparative Studies in Society and History 54 (02): 418–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mahmood, Saba. 2012b. Ethics and piety. In A companion to moral anthropology, ed. Didier Fassin. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Mahmood, Saba. 2013. The sensibility of critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood. In Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech, ed. Wendy Brown, and Judith Butler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Masquelier, Adeline. 2010. Women and Islamic revival in a West African town. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The invention of world religions, or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McClure, Kirstie M. 1990. Difference, diversity, and the limits of toleration. Political Theory 18 (3): 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mernissi, Fatima. 1991. The veil and the male elite: A feminist interpretation of women’s rights in Islam. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
  72. Merz, Johannes and Sharon. 2015. Secular and religious symbiosis: Strengthening postsecular anthropology through commitments to faith. In Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth, ASA15: Symbiotic anthropologies: Theoretical commensalities and methodological mutualism. University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  73. Miles, Robert, and Malcolm Brown. 2003. Racism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Motha, Stewart. 2007. Veiled women and the affect of religion in democracy. Journal of Law and Society 34 (1): 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Osanloo, Arzoo. 2009. The politics of women’s rights in Iran. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rappaport, Roy A. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity, vol. 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Razack, Sherene. 2008. Casting out: The eviction of Muslims from Western law and politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  78. Sedgwick, Mark J. 2006. Islam & Muslims: A guide to diverse experience in a modern world. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Pub.Google Scholar
  79. Shabi, Rachel. 2016. Burkini ban: New wave of French ‘Mission Civilatrice’. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
  80. Shaheed, Farida. 1994. Controlled or autonomous: Identity and the experience of the network, women living under Muslim laws. Signs 19 (4): 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Soares, Benjamin F., and Rene, Otayek. 2007. eds. Introduction: Islam and Muslim politics in Africa. In Islam and Muslim politics in Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  82. Taylor, Charles. 1979. What’s wrong with negative liberty? In The idea of freedom: Essays in honour of Isaiah Berlin, ed. Alan Rayan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Toor, Amar. 2016. French official threatens to sue social media users who share burkini photos. The Verge. Accessed 3 May 2017.
  85. Turner, Bryan. 2008. Acts of piety: The political and the religious, or a tale of two cities. In Acts of citizenship, ed. Engin Isin, and Greg Nielsen. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  86. Vakulenko, Anastasia. 2007. Islamic headscarves and the European convention on human rights: An intersectional perspective. Social & Legal Studies 16 (2): 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vakulenko, Anastasia. 2012. Islamic veiling in legal discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Vivian, Bradford. 1999. The veil and the visible. Western Journal of Communication 63 (2): 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Waggoner, Matt. 2005. Irony, embodiment, and the ‘critical attitude’: Engaging Saba Mahmood’s critique of secular morality. Culture and Religion 6 (2): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watt, Gary. 2013. Dress, law and naked truth: A cultural study of fashion and form. UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.Google Scholar
  91. Weir, Allison. 2013. Feminism and the Islamic revival: Freedom as a practice of belonging. Hypatia 28 (2): 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yegenoglu, Meyda. 1998. Colonial fantasies: Towards a feminist reading of orientalism. Cambridge cultural social studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zeeshan Mukhtar. 2015. Pakistan’s burqa-clad cartoon superhero makes foray into India. The Guardian. Accessed 3 May 2017.

Legal cases

  1. Arrowsmith v the United Kingdom  [1878] (App. N. 7050/75) 19 Eur Comm HR.Google Scholar
  2. Dahlab v Switzerland [2001] ECHR (Application 42393/98).Google Scholar
  3. Kokkinakis v Greece [1993] ECHR (Application 14307/88).Google Scholar
  4. R. (on the application of Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors, [2004] A.C.D. 66 Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) [2006] UKHL 15, House of Lords, Session 2005-06, (on appeal from [2005] EWCA Civ 199).Google Scholar
  5. Sahin v Turkey, [2005] ECHR Grand Chamber Judgment. (Application No. 44774/98, ECtHR).Google Scholar

Other legal documentation

  1. Collection of the cases on headscarf: Universitat Trier: Kopftuch. Accessed 15 July 2015.
  2. Commission De Réflexion sur l’application du principe de laïcité dans la République, Rapport au Président de La République (2003) Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
  3. Loi no. 2010-1192, interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l’espace public, Journal Officiel (JORF). 12 Oct 2010. 22f.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations