Advertisement

Law and Critique

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 43–60 | Cite as

Keyu and Others (2015): Derridean Hauntology and Lacanian-Žižekian Psychoanalysis in Between the Lines

Article
  • 228 Downloads

Abstract

This article will explore Derridean hauntology in relation to the UK Supreme Court case of Keyu & Others, as well as through the lens of Lacanian-Žižekian psychoanalysis. In particular, this article will argue that there are two main groups of spectres, or ghosts, which loom over the case. The first are the spectres of Marxism and class struggle, which form the overarching framework of the case. The second are the spectres of the victims of the Batang Kali killings in 1948 at the hands of a Scots Guard patrol. Here, Lacanian-Žižekian psychoanalysis can shed light on the tension between democracies and undemocratic measures, which co-exist side by side and indeed are mutually constitutive. In addition, Lacanian-Žižekian psychoanalysis can provide a way to further understand the need for the victims’ and their relatives’ voices to finally be heard and acknowledged by the Symbolic Order (the big Other). Lacanian-Žižekian psychoanalysis can further offer a useful interpretive framework through which to understand the traumatic impact of the killings of the Batang Kali rubber plantation workers on their relatives (the appellants of the case), and how it can potentially be mitigated through articulation and integration into the Symbolic. In so doing, this article will expose and bring to light the spectres and ghosts, as well as the obscene underside, that are latent in cases of historical human rights violations, whether those are related to insurgencies in the days of the decline of the British Empire or otherwise. This is important in terms of giving a voice, as well as acknowledging that voice, of the victims and survivors of such human rights violations, which is often silenced or ignored, as well as exposing and acknowledging the obscene supplement that characterizes, for example, democracies and their workings.

Keywords

Derrida European Convention on Human Rights Hauntology Jacques Lacan Keyu and Others (2015) Slavoj Žižek 

References

  1. Anderson, David M. 2014. Exit from empire: Counter-insurgency and decolonization in Kenya, 1952–1963. In At the end of military intervention: Historical, theoretical, and applied approaches to transition, handover, and withdrawal, ed. Robert Johnson, and Timothy Clack, 107–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristodemou, Maria. 2014. A constant craving for fresh brains and a taste for decaffeinated neighbours. European Journal of International Law 25(1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristodemou, Maria. 2015. The pervert’s guide to the law: Clinical vignettes from Breaking Bad to breaking free. In Žižek and law, ed. Laurent de Sutter, 13–30. Abingdon: Oxon.Google Scholar
  4. Belau, Linda. 2001. Trauma and the material signifier. Postmodern Culture 11(2).Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Rex. 2014. The Žižek dictionary. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Brendon, Piers. 2007. A moral audit of the British Empire. OpenDemocracy, 6 November. https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/globalisation/visions_reflections/british_empire.
  7. Davis, Colin. 2005. Hauntology, spectres and phantoms. French Studies 59(3): 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. Violence and metaphysics: An essay on the thought of Emmanuel Levinas. In Writing and difference (Trans. Alan Bass), 97–192. London: Routledge..Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 2006. Spectres of marxism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. de Ville, Jacques. 2007. Deconstruction and law: Derrida, Levinas and Cornell. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 25: 23–53.Google Scholar
  11. de Ville, Jacques. 2011. Jacques Derrida: Law as absolute hospitality. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Elkins, Caroline. 2005. Britain’s gulag: The brutal end of empire in Kenya. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  13. Fink, Bruce. 1995. The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fink, Bruce. 1997. A clinical introduction to Lacanian psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Danny. 2013. Torture and modernity. European Human Rights Law Review 5: 494–511.Google Scholar
  16. Frosh, Stephen. 2013. Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukuyama, Francis. 2012. The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Gordon, Avery F. 2008. Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, Avery F. 2011. Some thoughts on haunting and futurity. Borderlands 10(2): 1–21.Google Scholar
  20. Hack, Karl. 1999a. Iron claws on Malaya: The historiography of the Malayan emergency. Journal of South East Asian Studies 30(1): 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hack, Karl. 1999b. Imperialism and decolonisation in Southeast Asia: Colonial forces and British world power. In Colonial armies in Southeast Asia, ed. Tobias Rettig, and Karl Hack, 239–265. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hajjar, Lisa. 2013. Torture: A sociology of violence and human rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hale, Christopher. 2013. Massacre in Malaya: Exposing Britain’s My Lai. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harper, Timothy Norman. 2001. The end of empire and the making of Malaya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Huggan, Graham. 2014. Hauntings. W.G. Sebald as travel writer. In Travel and ethics: Theory and practice, ed. Corinne Fowler, Charles Forsdick, and Ludmilla Kostova, 231–241. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, Robert. 2011. The Malayan emergency and Indonesian confrontation: The Commonwealth’s war 1948–1966. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military.Google Scholar
  27. Keyu and Others v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another. [2015] UKSC 69.Google Scholar
  28. Lacan, Jacques. 1988. Seminar II: The Ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lacan, Jacques. 2001. Écrits: A selection. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  30. Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The ethics of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ladd, Thomas M. 1977. The Malayan communist insurgency. Asian Affairs 4(5): 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1991. Totality and infinity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Loytomaki, Stiina. 2014. Law and the politics of memory: Confronting the past. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Macherey, Pierre. 2008. Marx dematerialized, or the spirit of Derrida. In Ghostly demarcations: A symposium on Jacques Derrida’s spectres of Marx, ed. Michael Sprinker, 17–26. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. Monbiot, George. 2005. How Britain denies its holocausts. The Guardian. 27 December.Google Scholar
  36. Monbiot, George. 2012. Deny the British Empire’s crimes? No, we ignore them. The Guardian. 23 April. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/apr/23/british-empire-crimes-ignore-atrocities.
  37. Morgan, Michael. 1977. Britain’s imperial strategy and the Malayan labour movement 1945–1950. Race & Class 19(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramakrishna, Kumar. 2002. Emergency propaganda: The winning of Malayan hearts and minds 1948–1958. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Royle, Nicholas. 2003. The uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schroeder, Jeanne Lorraine. 2008. The four Lacanian discourses or turning law inside out. Abingdon: Birkbeck Law Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shapiro, Sean. 2013. Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions by Stephen Frosh. Jewish Quarterly 60(2): 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheehan, Sean. 2012. Žižek: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  43. Smale, Catherine. 2013. Phantom images: The figure of the ghost in the work of Christa Wolf and Irina Liebmann. London: Modern Humanities Research Association.Google Scholar
  44. Stanley, Tim. 2013. The British must not rewrite the history of the Mau Mau revolt. The Daily Telegraph. 6 June. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/kenya/10103371/The-British-must-not-rewrite-the-history-of-the-Mau-Mau-revolt.html.
  45. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Stenson, Michael. 1980. Class, race and colonialism in West Malaysia: The Indian case. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  47. The examined life. 2008. [Film]. Astra Taylor. Dir. Canada. Zeitgeist Films.Google Scholar
  48. Ucko, David H. 2010. The Malayan Emergency: The legacy and relevance of a counter-insurgency success story. Defence Studies 10(1–2): 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vadivella Belle, Carl. 2015. Tragic orphans: Indians in Malaysia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  51. Žižek, Slavoj. 1993. Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel, and the critique of ideology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. Welcome to the desert of the real. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Žižek, Slavoj. 2005a. The metastases of enjoyment: Six essays on women and causality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  54. Žižek, Slavoj. 2005b. Iraq: The borrowed kettle. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  55. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006a. The parallax view. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006b. How to read Lacan. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  57. Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. In defense of lost causes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  58. Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  59. Žižek, Slavoj. 2014. The most sublime hysteric: Hegel with Lacan. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sociology and Social PolicyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations