Law and Critique

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 45–61 | Cite as

Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony



The article proposes a new way of thinking through truth commissions by discerning the manner in which they usher in new political configurations through voices and vocalizations. It contributes to our understanding of truth commissions by way of proposing a pragmatic ontology of bonds between the body, voice, and testimony by elucidating the central features that make them vocal assemblages, composed of five sub-institutional capacities: (1) they affect and are affected by bodies in a complex topological relation; (2) they are driven by an apology, which itself proffers a non-human body of transformation; (3) they potentiate reconciliation through spontaneous vocalizations; (4) they are ontogenetic openings that reassemble national pasts, presents, and futures; and (5) they are temporally experiential predecessors to political action. While victim testimony is taken as a historical crowning of the edifice for nations seeking to mend their past injustices, I contend that public reparation flourishes only if the state is open to the alternative orientations the voice proffers—that is, following recent observations of transitional justice, truth commissions have the potential to seek out alternative context-specific forms of justice in place of a universal law of reconciliation. By way of a brief discussion of Aboriginal artist K.C. Adams’ diptych series, Perception, the article proposes that voices pose a nuanced figuration of auto-affection as a communicative possibility towards the (re)presentation and (re)invention of the (survivor) self.


Affect Transitional justice Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada Voice 


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of exception. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, Vanessa. 2007. History’s affective turn: Historical reenactment and its work in the present. Rethinking History 11(3): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angel, Naomi. 2009. Reframing the tolerant nation: Truth and reconciliation in Canada. Diss. Arts & Social Sciences: Department of Sociology, New York University.Google Scholar
  6. Blackman, Lisa. 2010. Embodying affect: Voice-hearing, telepathy, suggestion and modeling the non-conscious. Body & Society 16(1): 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackman, Lisa. 2012. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollmer, Grant David. 2014. Pathologies of affect: The ‘new wounded’ and the politics of ontology. Cultural Studies 28(2): 298–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clough, Patricia Ticineto. 2004. Future matters: Technoscience, global politics, and cultural criticism. Social Text 22(3): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clough, Patricia Ticineto. 2009. Reflections on sessions early in an analysis: Trauma, affect and ‘enactive witnessing’. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 19(2): 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clough, Patricia Ticineto, and Jean Halley (eds.). 2007. The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, Catherine M. 2010. Performing South Africa’s truth commission: Stages of transition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Connolly, William E. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, culture, speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coulthard, Glen S. 2007. Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the politics of recognition in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6(4): 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damasio, Antonio R. 2004. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, Gilles. 1978. Lecture transcripts on Spinoza’s concept of affect. Trans. Emilie and Julien Deleuze. Les Cours de Gilles Deleuze. Accessed 25 March 2015.
  17. Driver, Dorothy. 2005. Truth, reconciliation, gender: the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and black women’s intellectual history. Australian Feminist Studies 20(47): 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaertner, David Randall. 2012. Beyond truth: Materialist approaches to reconciliation theories and politics in Canada. Diss. Arts & Social Sciences: Department of English, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  19. Givoni, Michal. 2013. The ethics of witnessing and the politics of the governed. Theory, Culture & Society 31(1): 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton, Sylvia D. 2011. Stories from the little black schoolhouse. In Cultivating Canada: Reconciliation through the lens of cultural diversity, ed. Ashok Mathur, Jonathan Dewar, and Mike Degagné. Ottawa, ON: Aboriginal Healing Foundation Research Series.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, Mark. 2004. New philosophy for new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Humphrey, Michael. 2000. From terror to trauma: Commissioning truth for national reconciliation. Social Identities 6(1): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leys, Ruth. 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37(3): 434–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCormack, Derek P. 2007. Molecular affects in human geographies. Environment and Planning 39(2): 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moon, Claire. 2008. Narrating political reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  27. Niezen, Ronald. 2013. Truth and indignation: Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian residential schools. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2006. Rule-of-law tools for post-conflict states. Accessed 2 Sep 2015.
  29. Oliver, Kelly. 2010. Witnessing and testimony. Parallax 10(1): 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2014. Spatial justice: Body, lawscape, atmosphere. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Schlichter, Annette. 2011. Do voices matter? Vocality, materiality, gender performativity. Body and Society 17(1): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shields, Rob. 2013. Spatial questions: Cultural topologies and social spatialisation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1996. Can the subaltern speak? In A historical archaeology of the modern world, ed. C.E. Orser Jr. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, Catherine. 2013. Deconstructing transitional justice. Law and Critique 24(2): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turner, Dale. 2006. This is not a peace pipe: Towards a critical indigenous philosophy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  37. Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2005. Media representations of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their commitment to reconciliation. Journal of African Cultural Studies 17(2): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009. Dealing with a traumatic past: The victim hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their reconciliation discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 6(4): 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young, Alison. 2014. Street art, public city: Law, crime and the urban imagination. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations