Skip to main content
Log in

Paradise Lost...: The Meaning of Modernity and the Antinomy of the Law

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay argues for the centrality of the study of paradoxes of particularity and universality in the interface between law and politics in modernity. Particularly, in order to understand the process of constitution of a political collective and the role of supernumerary elements that re-enter a constituted legal-political system. After introducing the question of paradoxes or antinomies in the relation between law and politics in modernity, the essay engages with current understandings of exceptionalism and the possibility of a leftist or ‘real’ suspension of the law. In order to do so, this essay makes full use of certain theoretical tools developed in anthropological accounts of political and legal processes, and current French-oriented and Latin American political philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Guardiola-Rivera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guardiola-Rivera, O. Paradise Lost...: The Meaning of Modernity and the Antinomy of the Law. Law Critique 17, 107–127 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-005-5623-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-005-5623-0

Keywords

Navigation