Advertisement

Tetanic depression and catch-like effect in fast motor units of the rat medial gastrocnemius at linearly increasing and decreasing stimulation frequencies

  • Dawid Łochyński
  • Jan Celichowski
Original Paper

Abstract

The forces developed by fast resistant (FR) and fast fatigable (FF) motor units of the rat medial gastrocnemius during trains of electrical stimuli at linearly increasing or decreasing frequency were measured at the instantaneous frequency of 60 Hz and compared with the force evoked at a constant 60 Hz. In both motor unit types, the mean forces during stimulation at increasing frequency were depressed by 17%, while those recorded during stimulation at decreasing frequency were increased by 15% (FR) or 10% (FF) compared to values observed during constant-rate stimulation. During trains of stimuli at an increasing rate, the instantaneous frequency necessary to induce a force comparable to that produced at constant 60 Hz stimulation in FR and FF units was 84 and 88 Hz, respectively; whereas for the same units during stimulation at a decreasing rate these values were 45 and 47 Hz, respectively. When the stimulation frequency was increased up to 60 Hz and then held at this level, the force of both motor unit types was depressed by approximately 6% compared to 60 Hz constant-rate stimulation. From the available data it may be concluded that the phenomenon of tetanic depression is able to limit the development of force when the motoneuronal firing rate increases.

Keywords

Force-frequency relationship Isometric force generation Tetanic depression Motor unit Medial gastrocnemius muscle Rat 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant no. N N404 027 35.

References

  1. Abbate F, Burton JD, De Haan A, Westerblad H (2002) Prolonged force increase following a high-frequency burst is not due to a sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283:C42–C47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colombini B, Colomo F (2002) A non-cross-bridge stiffness in activated frog muscle fibers. Biophys J 82:3118–3127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder-Macleod SA, Clamann HP (1989) Force output of cat motor units stimulated with trains of linearly varying frequency. J Neurophysiol 61:208–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boe SG, Stashuk DW, Brown WF, Doherty TJ (2005) Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates. Muscle Nerve 31:365–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buller AJ, Kean CJC, Ranatunga KW, Smith JM (1981) Post-tetanic depression of twitch tension in the cat soleus muscle. Exp Neurol 73:78–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE (1970) Catch property in single mammalian motor units. Science 168:122–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE (1973) Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol 234:723–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE (1976) The effect of activation history on the tension production by the individual muscle units. Brain Res 109:515–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Celichowski J (2001) Tetanic depression: a phenomenon influencing the production of tension in fast twitch motor units in rat medial gastrocnemius. Acta Neurobiol Exp 61:119–123Google Scholar
  10. Celichowski J, Bichler E (2000) The influence of increasing and decreasing frequency of stimulation on the contraction of motor units in rat medial gastrocnemius muscle. J Physiol Pharmacol 51:847–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Celichowski J, Grottel K (1992) The dependence of twitch course of medial gastrocnemius and its motor units on stretching of the muscle. Arch Ital Biol 130:315–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Celichowski J, Grottel K (1998) The influence of a doublet of stimuli at the beginning of the tetanus on its time course. Acta Neurobiol Exp 58:47–53Google Scholar
  13. Celichowski J, Krutki P, Łochyński D, Grottel K, Mrówczyński W (2004) Tetanic depression in fast motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol Pharmacol 55:291–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Celichowski J, Raikova R, Drzymała-Celichowska H, Ciechanowicz-Kowalczyk I, Krutki P, Rusev R (2008) Model-generated decomposition of unfused tetani of motor units evoked by random stimulation. J Biomech 41:3448–3454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christie A, Kamen G (2006) Doublet discharges in motoneurones of young and older adults. J Neurophysiol 95:2787–2795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Luca CJ, Lefever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP (1982) Behavior of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol 329:113–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Duchateau J, Hainaut K (1986) Nonlinear summation of contractions in striated muscle. II. Potentiation of intracellular Ca2+ movements in single barnacle muscle fibers. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 7:18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorassini M, Eken T, Bennett DJ, Kiehn O, Hultborn H (2000) Activity of hindlimb motor units during locomotion in the conscious rat. J Neurophysiol 83:2002–2011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grottel K, Celichowski J (1990) Division of motor units in medial gastrocnemius muscle of the rat in the light of variability in their principal properties. Acta Neurobiol Exp 50:589–600Google Scholar
  20. Hennig R, Lømo T (1985) Firing patterns of motor units in normal rats. Nature 314:164–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kernell D, Eerbeek O, Verhey BA (1983) Relation between isometric force and stimulus rate in cat’s hindlimb motor units of different twitch contraction time. Exp Brain Res 50:220–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuffler SW, Hunt CC, Quilliam JP (1951) Function of medullated small-nerve fibers in mammalian ventral roots: efferent muscle spindle innervation. J Neurophysiol 14:29–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R (1973) Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions. J Physiol 230:371–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moritz CT, Barry KB, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005) Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93:2449–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Person RS, Kudina LP (1972) Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 32:471–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Powers RK, Türker KS, Binder MD (2002) What can be learned about motoneurone properties from studying firing patterns. In: Gandevia SC, Proske U, Stuart DG (eds) Sensorimotor control of movement and posture. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 199–206Google Scholar
  27. Ranatunga KW (1978) Characteristics of tension recruitment and mechanical activation in mammalian skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol 61:175–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ranatunga KW (1979) Potentiation of the isometric twitch and mechanisms of tension recruitment in mammalian skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol 63:266–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rome LC (2006) Design and function of superfast muscles: new insights into the physiology of skeletal muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 68:193–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roots H, Offer GW, Ranatunga KW (2007) Comparison of the tension responses to ramp shortening and lengthening in intact mammalian muscle fibres: crossbridge and non-crossbridge contributions. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 28:123–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson DM, Larimer JL (1968) The catch property of ordinary muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 61:909–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurobiologyUniversity School of Physical EducationPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations