Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 89–104 | Cite as

Sarcomere dynamics during muscular contraction and their implications to muscle function

  • Ivo A. Telley
  • Jachen Denoth
Review Paper


This article attempts to identify the key aspects of sarcomere inhomogeneity and the dynamics of sarcomere length changes in muscle contraction experiments and focuses on understanding the mechanics of myofibrils or muscle fibres when viewed as independent units of biological motors (the half-sarcomeres) connected in series. Muscle force generation has been interpreted traditionally on the basis of the kinetics of crossbridge cycling, i.e. binding of myosin heads to actin and consecutive force generating conformational change of the head, under controlled conditions and assuming uniformity of sarcomere or half-sarcomere behaviour. However, several studies have shown that re-distribution of internal strain within myofibrils and muscle fibres may be a key player, particularly, during stretch or relaxation so that force kinetics parameters are strongly affected by sarcomere dynamics. Here, we aim to shed light on how force generation, crossbridge kinetics, and the complex sarcomere movements are to be linked and which mechanical concepts are necessary to develop a comprehensive contraction model of a myofibril.


Inhomogeneity Myofibril mechanics Half-sarcomere Relaxation 



The authors are grateful to KW Ranatunga (Bristol) and Robert Stehle (Cologne) for valuable suggestions on the manuscript, and to the reviewers of this article for constructive comments.


  1. Agarkova I, Auerbach D, Ehler E, Perriard JC (2000) A novel marker for vertebrate embryonic heart, the EH-myomesin isoform. J Biol Chem 275:10256–10264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarkova I, Perriard JC (2005) The M-band: an elastic web that crosslinks thick filaments in the center of the sarcomere. Trends Cell Biol 15:477–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anazawa T, Yasuda K, Ishiwata S (1992) Spontaneous oscillation of tension and sarcomere length in skeletal myofibrils. Microscopic measurement and analysis. Biophys J 61:1099–1108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colombini B (2005) Crossbridge properties investigated by fast ramp stretching of activated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 565:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colomo F, Tesi C (1988) Plateau and descending limb of the sarcomere length-tension relation in short length-clamped segments of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 401:581–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagni MA, Colombini B, Geiger P, Berlinguer Palmini R, Cecchi G (2004) A non cross-bridge calcium-dependent stiffness in frog muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286:C1353–C1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartoo ML, Popov VI, Fearn LA, Pollack GH (1993) Active tension generation in isolated skeletal myofibrils. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 14:498–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner B, Eisenberg E (1986) Rate of force generation in muscle: correlation with actomyosin ATPase activity in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3542–3546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cecchi G, Griffiths PJ, Bagni MA, Ashley CC, Maeda Y (1991) Time-resolved changes in equatorial x-ray diffraction and stiffness during rise of tetanic tension in intact length-clamped single muscle fibers. Biophys J 59:1273–1283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung A, Dantzig JA, Hollingworth S, Baylor SM, Goldman YE, Mitchison TJ, Straight AF (2002) A small-molecule inhibitor of skeletal muscle myosin II. Nat Cell Biol 4:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colomo F, Piroddi N, Poggesi C, te Kronnie G, Tesi C (1997) Active and passive forces of isolated myofibrils from cardiac and fast skeletal muscle of the frog. J Physiol 500:535–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke R (1997) Actomyosin interaction in striated muscle. Physiol Rev 77:671–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coupland ME, Ranatunga KW (2003) Force generation induced by rapid temperature jumps in intact mammalian (rat) skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 548:439–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danuser G (1997) Quantitative stereo vision for the stereo light microscope. Dissertation, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  15. Decostre V, Bianco P, Lombardi V, Piazzesi G (2005) Effect of temperature on the working stroke of muscle myosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13927–13932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denoth J, Stussi E, Csucs G, Danuser G (2002) Single muscle fiber contraction is dictated by inter-sarcomere dynamics. J Theor Biol 216:101–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edman KA, Caputo C, Lou F (1993) Depression of tetanic force induced by loaded shortening of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 466:535–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Edman KA, Elzinga G, Noble MI (1982) Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol 80:769–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edman KA, Flitney FW (1982) Laser diffraction studies of sarcomere dynamics during ‘isometric’ relaxation in isolated muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol 329:1–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Edman KA, Reggiani C (1984a) Length-tension-velocity relationships studied in short consecutive segments of intact muscle fibres of the frog. Adv Exp Med Biol 170:495–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Edman KA, Reggiani C (1984b) Redistribution of sarcomere length during isometric contraction of frog muscle fibres and its relation to tension creep. J Physiol 351:169–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Edman KA, Reggiani C (1987) The sarcomere length-tension relation determined in short segments of intact muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol 385:709–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman AL, Goldman YE (1996) Mechanical characterization of skeletal muscle myofibrils. Biophys J 71:2774–2785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galler S, Hopflinger MC, Andruchov O, Andruchova O, Grassberger H (2005) Effects of vanadate, phosphate and 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) on skinned molluscan catch muscle. Pflugers Arch 449(4):372–383Google Scholar
  25. Goldspink G (2005) Mechanical signals, IGF-I gene splicing, and muscle adaptation. Physiology 20:232–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon AM, Homsher E, Regnier M (2000) Regulation of contraction in striated muscle. Physiol Rev 80:853–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ (1966) The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184:170–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Granzier H, Kellermayer M, Helmes M, Trombitas K (1997) Titin elasticity and mechanism of passive force development in rat cardiac myocytes probed by thin-filament extraction. Biophys J 73:2043–2053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Grove BK, Kurer V, Lehner C, Doetschman TC, Perriard JC, Eppenberger HM (1984) A new 185,000-dalton skeletal muscle protein detected by monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Biol 98:518–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guo B, Guilford WH (2006) Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9844–9849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herzog W (2005) Force enhancement following stretch of activated muscle: critical review and proposal for mechanisms. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:173–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilber K, Galler S (1998) Improvement of the measurements on skinned muscle fibres by fixation of the fibre ends with glutaraldehyde. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 19:365–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill AV (1953) The mechanics of active muscle. Proc R Soc London, B 141:104–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill AV (1970) First and last experiments in muscle mechanics. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill M, Wernig A, Goldspink G (2003) Muscle satellite (stem) cell activation during local tissue injury and repair. J Anat 203:89–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horowits R, Podolsky RJ (1987) The positional stability of thick filaments in activated skeletal muscle depends on sarcomere length: evidence for the role of titin filaments. J Cell Biol 105:2217–2223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 7:255–318Google Scholar
  38. Huxley AF, Lombardi V, Peachey LD (1981) A system for fast recording of longitudinal displacement of a striated muscle fiber. J Physiol 317:12–13PGoogle Scholar
  39. Huxley AF, Simmons RM (1971) Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature 233:533–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huxley AF, Simmons RM (1973) Mechanical transients and origin of muscular force. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 37:669–680Google Scholar
  41. Huxley AF, Tideswell S (1996) Filament compliance and tension transients in muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 17:507–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iwazumi T (1987) High-speed ultrasensitive instrumentation for myofibril mechanics measurements. Am J Physiol 252:C253–C262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Julian FJ (1969) Activation in a skeletal muscle contraction model with a modification for insect fibrillar muscle. Biophys J 9:547–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Julian FJ, Morgan DL (1979) Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 293:365–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kawai M, Brandt PW (1980) Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscles of rabbit, frog and crayfish. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1:279–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kellermayer MS, Granzier HL (1996) Calcium-dependent inhibition of in vitro thin-filament motility by native titin. FEBS Lett 380:281–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kulke M, Fujita-Becker S, Rostkova E, Neagoe C, Labeit D, Manstein DJ, Gautel M, Linke WA (2001) Interaction between PEVK-titin and actin filaments: origin of a viscous force component in cardiac myofibrils. Circ Res 89:874–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Labeit D, Watanabe K, Witt C, Fujita H, Wu Y, Lahmers S, Funck T, Labeit S, Granzier H (2003) Calcium-dependent molecular spring elements in the giant protein titin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13716–13721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Linari M, Dobbie I, Reconditi M, Koubassova N, Irving M, Piazzesi G, Lombardi V (1998) The stiffness of skeletal muscle in isometric contraction and rigor: the fraction of myosin heads bound to actin. Biophys J 74:2459–2473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Linke WA, Ivemeyer M, Labeit S, Hinssen H, Ruegg JC, Gautel M (1997) Actin-titin interaction in cardiac myofibrils: probing a physiological role. Biophys J 73:905–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Linke WA, Popov VI, Pollack GH (1994) Passive and active tension in single cardiac myofibrils. Biophys J 67:782–792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lionne C, Iorga B, Candau R, Travers F (2003) Why choose myofibrils to study muscle myosin ATPase? J Muscle Res Cell Motil 24:139–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Littlefield R, Fowler VM (2002) Measurement of thin filament lengths by distributed deconvolution analysis of fluorescence images. Biophys J 82:2548–2564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Luo Y, Cooke R, Pate E (1994) Effect of series elasticity on delay in development of tension relative to stiffness during muscle activation. Am J Physiol 267:C1598–C1606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Luther PK, Padron R, Ritter S, Craig R, Squire JM (2003) Heterogeneity of Z-band structure within a single muscle sarcomere: implications for sarcomere assembly. J Mol Biol 332:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mantovani M, Heglund NC, Cavagna GA (2001) Energy transfer during stress relaxation of contracting frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 537:923–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morgan DL (1990) New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. Biophys J 57:209–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Morgan DL (1994) An explanation for residual increased tension in striated muscle after stretch during contraction. Exp Physiol 79:831–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Morgan DL, Mochon S, Julian FJ (1982) A quantitative model of intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end contractions of single frog muscle fibers. Biophys J 39:189–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Morgan DL, Proske U (1984) Mechanical properties of toad slow muscle attributed to non-uniform sarcomere lengths. J Physiol 349:107–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Mulligan IP, Palmer RE, Lipscomb S, Hoskins B, Ashley CC (1999) The effect of phosphate on the relaxation of frog skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch 437:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mutungi G, Ranatunga KW (2000) Sarcomere length changes during end-held (isometric) contractions in intact mammalian (rat) fast and slow muscle fibres. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 21:565–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nishiyama K (1984) Analysis of mechanical behavior of muscle by a multi-sarcomere model. Adv Exp Med Biol 170:637–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Obermann WM, Gautel M, Steiner F, van der Ven PF, Weber K, Furst DO (1996) The structure of the sarcomeric M band: localization of defined domains of myomesin, M-protein, and the 250-kD carboxy-terminal region of titin by immunoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol 134:1441–1453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ostap EM (2002) 2,3-Butanedione monoxime (BDM) as a myosin inhibitor. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 23:305–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peterson DR, Rassier DE, Herzog W (2004) Force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibres on the ascending limb of the force-length relationship. J Exp Biol 207:2787–2791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piazzesi G, Francini F, Linari M, Lombardi V (1992) Tension transients during steady lengthening of tetanized muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol 445:659–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Piazzesi G, Lucii L, Lombardi V (2002) The size and the speed of the working stroke of muscle myosin and its dependence on the force. J Physiol 545:145–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Piazzesi G, Reconditi M, Koubassova N, Decostre V, Linari M, Lucii L, Lombardi V (2003) Temperature dependence of the force-generating process in single fibres from frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 549:93–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pinniger GJ, Bruton JD, Westerblad H, Ranatunga KW (2005) Effects of a myosin-II inhibitor (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide, BTS) on contractile characteristics of intact fast-twitch mammalian muscle fibres. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 26(2–3):135–141Google Scholar
  71. Pinniger GJ, Ranatunga KW, Offer GW (2006) Crossbridge and non-crossbridge contributions to tension in lengthening muscle: force-induced reversal of the power stroke. J Physiol 573:627–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piroddi N, Belus A, Eiras S, Tesi C, van der Velden J, Poggesi C, Stienen GJ (2006) No direct effect of creatine phosphate on the cross-bridge cycle in cardiac myofibrils. Pflugers Arch 452:3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Poggesi C, Tesi C, Stehle R (2005) Sarcomeric determinants of striated muscle relaxation kinetics. Pflugers Arch 449:505–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rassier DE, Herzog W (2004) Active force inhibition and stretch-induced force enhancement in frog muscle treated with BDM. J Appl Physiol 97:1395–1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rassier DE, Herzog W, Pollack GH (2003a) Dynamics of individual sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated single myofibrils. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1735–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rassier DE, Herzog W, Pollack GH (2003b) Stretch-induced force enhancement and stability of skeletal muscle myofibrils. Adv Exp Med Biol 538: 501–515; discussion 515Google Scholar
  77. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1979) Interpretation of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle as Bragg reflexion of light by the lattice of contractile proteins. J Physiol 290:317–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Saldana RP, Smith DA (1991) Four aspects of creep phenomena in striated muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 12:517–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schachar R, Herzog W, Leonard T (2002) Force enhancement above the initial isometric force on the descending limb of the force-length relationship. J Biomech 35:1299–1306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shah SB, Su FC, Jordan K, Milner DJ, Friden J, Capetanaki Y, Lieber RL (2002) Evidence for increased myofibrillar mobility in desmin-null mouse skeletal muscle. J Exp Biol 205:321–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Shaw MA, Ostap EM, Goldman YE (2003) Mechanism of inhibition of skeletal muscle actomyosin by N-benzyl-p-toluenesulfonamide. Biochemistry 42:6128–6135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shitaka Y, Kimura C, Iio T, Miki M (2004) Kinetics of the structural transition of muscle thin filaments observed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biochemistry 43:10739–10747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Simnett SJ, Johns EC, Lipscomb S, Mulligan IP, Ashley CC (1998) Effect of pH, phosphate, and ADP on relaxation of myocardium after photolysis of diazo 2. Am J Physiol 275:H951–H960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Stehle R, Krüger M, Pfitzer G (2002a) Force kinetics and individual sarcomere dynamics in cardiac myofibrils after rapid Ca(2+) changes. Biophys J 83:2152–2161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Stehle R, Krüger M, Scherer P, Brixius K, Schwinger RH, Pfitzer G (2002b) Isometric force kinetics upon rapid activation and relaxation of mouse, guinea pig and human heart muscle studied on the subcellular myofibrillar level. Basic Res Cardiol 97(Suppl 1):127–135Google Scholar
  86. Stehle R, Solzin J, Iorga B, Gomez D, Blaudeck N, Pfitzer G (2006) Mechanical properties of sarcomeres during cardiac myofibrillar relaxation: stretch-induced cross-bridge detachment contributes to early diastolic filling. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 27:423–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sugi H, Tsuchiya T (1998) Muscle mechanics I: intact single muscle fibres. In: Sugi H (ed) Current methods in muscle physiology: advantages, problems and limitations, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Sun YB, Hilber K, Irving M (2001) Effect of active shortening on the rate of ATP utilisation by rabbit psoas muscle fibres. J Physiol 531:781–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tatsumi R, Maeda K, Hattori A, Takahashi K (2001) Calcium binding to an elastic portion of connectin/titin filaments. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 22:149–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Telley IA, Denoth J, Ranatunga KW (2003) Inter-sarcomere dynamics in muscle fibres. A neglected subject? Adv Exp Med Biol 538:481–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Telley IA, Denoth J, Stussi E, Pfitzer G, Stehle R (2006a) Half-sarcomere dynamics in myofibrils during activation and relaxation studied by tracking fluorescent markers. Biophys J 90:514–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Telley IA, Stehle R, Ranatunga KW, Pfitzer G, Stussi E, Denoth J (2006b) Dynamic behaviour of half-sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated psoas myofibrils: sarcomere asymmetry but no ‘sarcomere popping’. J Physiol 573:173–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tesi C, Colomo F, Piroddi N, Poggesi C (2002a) Characterization of the cross-bridge force-generating step using inorganic phosphate and BDM in myofibrils from rabbit skeletal muscles. J Physiol 541:187–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tesi C, Piroddi N, Colomo F, Poggesi C (2002b) Relaxation kinetics following sudden Ca(2+) reduction in single myofibrils from skeletal muscle. Biophys J 83:2142–2151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Veigel C, Molloy JE, Schmitz S, Kendrick-Jones J (2003) Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers. Nat Cell Biol 5:980–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang K, Ramirez-Mitchell R (1983) A network of transverse and longitudinal intermediate filaments is associated with sarcomeres of adult vertebrate skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 96:562–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yaniv Y, Sivan R, Landesberg A (2006) Stability, controllability, and observability of the “four state” model for the sarcomeric control of contraction. Ann Biomed Eng 34:778–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yildiz A, Selvin PR (2005) Fluorescence imaging with one nanometer accuracy: application to molecular motors. Acc Chem Res 38:574–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zahalak GI (1997) Can muscle fibers be stable on the descending limbs of their sarcomere length-tension relations? J Biomech 30:1179–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH ZurichInstitute for BiomechanicsZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)HeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations