Effect of side chains in block polycarboxylate superplasticizers on early-age properties of cement paste

  • Xiumei Wang
  • Jiangang Zhang
  • Yong Yang
  • Xin Shu
  • Qianping Ran
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Even though numerous research projects have been carried out on the subject concerning interactions between sequence structure of polycarboxylate superplasticizers (PC) and cement, many questions remain unsolved, such as the influence of PC on early-age microstructural development and PC adsorption behavior. The study first successfully synthesized well-defined block PC with varying side chains length and side chains density using reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. The influence of side chains in block PC on the early-age properties of cement paste was systematically studied by various characterization methods such as paste flow, adsorption properties, calorimetric measurements and amount of hydration products. The results have illustrated that PC with longer side chains and lower side chains density shows higher adsorption amount, thereby a better workability for a given mass ratio of adsorption groups to side chains. Furthermore, the adsorption amount decreases with the increasing side chains length for a fixed length of main chain as well as side chains density. However, there is better initial paste flow and higher paste flow retention capability owing to longer side chains. It is worth noting that PC with longer side chains promotes the cement hydration process thus increasing the hydration products owing to larger surface coverage. All these findings close the gap between side chains in block PC and early-age properties, providing suggestions for the design of PC.

Keywords

Polycarboxylate superplasticizers (PC) Side chains Adsorption amount Paste flow Cement hydration Morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0310100) and the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Civil Engineering Materials (2014CEM001).

References

  1. 1.
    Houst YF, Bowen P, Perche F, et al. Design and function of novel superplasticizers for more durable high performance concrete (superplast project). Cem Concr Res. 2008;38(10):1197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lura P, Winnefeld F, Klemm S. Simultaneous measurements of heat of hydration and chemical shrinkage on hardening cement pastes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;101(3):925–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zingg A, Winnefeld F, Holzer L, et al. Adsorption of polyelectrolytes and its influence on the rheology, zeta potential, and microstructure of various cement and hydrate phases. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;323(2):301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pourchet S, Liautaud S, Rinaldi D, et al. Effect of the repartition of the PEG side chains on the adsorption and dispersion behaviors of PCP in presence of sulfate. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(2):431–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plank J, Gretz M. Study on the interaction between anionic and cationic latex particles and Portland cement. Colloid Surf A. 2008;330(2):227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ran QP, Qiao M, Liu JP. Influence of Ca2+ on the performance of poly (acrylic acid)-g-poly (ethylene glycol) comb-like copolymers in cement suspensions. Iran Polym J. 2014;23(9):663–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winnefeld F, Becker S, Pakusch J, et al. Effects of the molecular architecture of comb-shaped superplasticizers on their performance in cementitious systems. Cem Concr Compos. 2007;29(4):251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zingg A, Winnefeld F, Holzer L, et al. Interaction of polycarboxylate based superplasticizers with cements containing different C3A amounts. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31(3):153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elżbieta JR. The effect of superplasticizers’ chemical structure on their efficiency in cement pastes. Constr Build Mater. 2013;38:1204–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plank J, Pöllmann K, Zouaoui N, et al. Synthesis and performance of methacrylic ester based polycarboxylate superplasticizers possessing hydroxy terminated poly(ethylene glycol) side chains. Cem Concr Res. 2008;38(10):1210–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shu X, Ran QP, Liu JP, et al. Tailoring the solution conformation of polycarboxylate superplasticizer toward the improvement of dispersing performance in cement paste. Constr Build Mater. 2016;116:289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ran QP, Wang XM, Shu X, et al. Effects of sequence structure of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on the dispersion behavior of cement paste. J Disper Sci Technol. 2016;37(3):431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ran QP, Wang XM, Jiang J, et al. Synthesis of block polycarboxylate copolymer and its application in cement system. Adv Cem Res. 2016;28(3):202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang XM, Ran QP, Yang Y, et al. Influence of sequence structure of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on early age properties of cement paste. J Mater Civ Eng. 2016;28(10):04016112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siler P, Kratky J, De Belie N. Isothermal and solution calorimetry to assess the effect of superplasticizers and mineral admixtures on cement hydration. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;107(1):313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jolicoeur C, Simard MA. Chemical admixture-cement interactions: phenomenology and physico-chemical concepts. Cem Concr Compos. 1998;20(2–3):87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uchikawa H, Hanehara S, Shirasaka T, et al. Effect of admixture on hydration of cement, adsorptive behavior of admixture and fluidity and setting of fresh cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 1992;22(6):1115–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ran QP, Somasundaran P, Miao CW, et al. Adsorption mechanism of comb polymer dispersants at the cement/water interface. J Disper Sci Technol. 2010;31(6):790–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamada K, Takahashi T, Hanehara S, et al. Effects of the chemical structure on the properties of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(2):197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Plank J, Bachsenhauser B. Impact of molecular structure on zeta potential and adsorbed conformation of α-Allyl-ω-Methoxy- polyethylene glycol-Maleic anhydride superplasticizers. J Adv Concr Technol. 2006;4(2):233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peng XY, Yi CH, Deng YH, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizers with different carboxylic contents used in a cement system. Int J Polym Mater. 2011;60(12):923–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Plank J, Sachsenhauser B. Experimental determination of the effective anionic charge density of polycarboxylate superplasticizers in cement pore solution. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li YW, Yang CL, Zhang YF, et al. Study on dispersion, adsorption and flow retaining behaviors of cement mortars with TPEG-type polyether kind polycarboxylate superplasticizers. Constr Build Mater. 2014;64(22):324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anagnostopoulos CA. Effect of different superplasticisers on the physical and mechanical properties of cement grouts. Constr Build Mater. 2014;50(1):162–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiumei Wang
    • 1
  • Jiangang Zhang
    • 1
  • Yong Yang
    • 1
  • Xin Shu
    • 1
  • Qianping Ran
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Jiangsu Sobute New Materials Co., Ltd.NanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of High Performance Civil Engineering MaterialsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations