Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Energy evaluation of biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of pine pellets

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wood pellets are mainly used in heating environments, commercial and residential, as well as fuel for production of thermal and electric energy in industrial plants. Furthermore, the heterogeneity and variable moisture content, combined with the high cost of transport, are limiting challenges that must be overcome with new technologies and new products. In this context, torrefaction and pyrolysis are attractive alternatives for increasing energy density and decreasing the moisture content of the samples, based on thermochemical conversion in a non-oxidizing atmosphere. Samples were produced to perform the energetic characterization of biochar from pine pellet using different heating rates 5–30 °C min−1, different residence temperatures 200, 280 and 570 °C and different residence time (1 and 0.5 h). The high heating value (HHV) of each variable was measured and allowed to observe that the heating rate did not influence of a significant way the results, in other words, a 5 % variation between the lowest and highest heating rate. Notwithstanding, the HHV was expressive compared to the pellet in nature, when it has been found an energetic gain over 80 %. In general, the biochar from pine pellets obtained by torrefaction or pyrolysis has appropriated characteristics compared to pellets in nature, showing a greater amount of energy per unit, high stability, reduced moisture content and reduced ash content. The kinetic of combustion to biochar in oxygen-rich atmosphere showed the dependence between the activation energy and conversion degree, with a continuous decrease in the activation energy, characteristic of complex processes comprised by initial reversible reaction followed by an irreversible one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansen MT, Jein AR, Hayes S, Bateman P. English handbook for wood pellet combustion. Pelletsatlas, 2009. http://www.pelletsatlas.info/pelletsatlas_docs/.Accessed02Dez 2014.

  2. Wood pellet heating: a reference on wood pellet fuels & technology for small commercial & industrial facilities. By the Biomass Energy Resource Center. Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources. 2007. http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/doer/publications/doer-pellet-guidebook.Accessed02Dez2014.

  3. Palmer D, Tubby I, Hogan G, Rolls W. Biomass heating: a guide to small log and wood pellet systems. Biomass Energy Centre, Forest Research, Farnham. 2011. http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/.Accessed02Dez2014.

  4. Johanssona LS, Lecknerb B, Gustavssona L, Cooperc D, Tullina C, Potter A. Emission characteristics of modern and old-type residential boilers fired with wood logs and wood pellets. Atmos Environ. 2004;38:4183–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Giacomo G, Taglieri L. Renewable energy benefits with conversion of woody residues to pellets. Energy. 2009;34:724–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Stelt MJC, Gerhauser H, Kiel JHA, Ptasinski KJ. Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:3748–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nunes LJR, Matias JCO, Catalo JPS. A review on torrefied biomass pellets as a sustainable alternative to coal in power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;40:153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Medic D, Darr M, Shah A, Potter B, Zimmerman J. Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgrading. Fuel. 2012;91:147–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wannapeera J, Fungtammasan B, Worasuwannarak N. Effects of temperature and holding time during torrefaction on the pyrolysis behaviors of woody biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2011;92:99–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sacchelli S, Fagarazzi C, Bernetti I. Economic evaluation of forest biomass production in central Italy: a scenario assessment based on spatial analysis tool. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;53:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leslie AD, Mencuccini M, Perks M. The potential for Eucalyptus as a wood fuel in the UK. Appl Energy. 2012;89:176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohl T, Laukkanen T, Jrvinen M, Fogelholm CJ. Energetic and environmental performance of three biomass upgrading processes integrated with a CHP plant. Appl Energy. 2013;107:124–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas P. Araucaria angustifolia. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.3, 2013. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloadedon06May2015.

  14. Guerra MP, Silveira V, dos Santos ALW, Astarita LV, Nodari RO. Somatic embryogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia (Bert) O. Ktze. In: Jain SM, Gupta PK, Newton RJ, editors. Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Rotterdam: Springer; 2000. p. 457–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Santos LB, Striebeck MV, Crespi MS, Ribeiro CA, De Julio M. Characterization of biochar of pine pellet. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s10973-015-4740-8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM D792-13, Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.

  17. ASTM E873-82(2013), Standard test method for bulk density of densified particulate biomass fuels. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.

  18. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83:37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM E7-03(2009), Standard terminology relating to metallography. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009.

  20. Librenti I, Ceotto E, Di Candilo M. Biomass characteristics and Energy contents of dedicated lignocellulosic crops. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on energy from biomass and waste. Venice, Italy, 8–11 Nov 2010, pp. 8.

  21. ASTM D3173-11, Standard test method for moisture in the analysis sample of coal and coke. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011.

  22. ASTM D3174-12, Standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.

  23. Vyazovkin S, Chrissafis K, Di Lorenzo ML, Koga N, Pijolat M, Roduit B, Sbirrazzuoli N, Sun̄ol JJ. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for collecting experimental thermal analysis data for kinetic computations. Thermochim Acta. 2014;590:1–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Torquato LM, Braz CEM, Ribeiro CA, Capela JMV, Crespi MS. Kinetic study of the co-firing of bagasse-sludge blends. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s10973-015-4514-3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wanjun T, Donghua C. An integral method to determine variation in activation energy with extent of conversion. Thermochim Acta. 2005;433(12):72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marcilla A, Garcia-Garcia S, Asensio A, Conesa JA. Influence of thermal treatment regime on the density and reactivity of activated carbons from almond shells. Carbon. 2000;38:429–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bridgwater AV. Principles and practice of biomass fast pyrolysis processes for liquids. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1999;51:3–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bridgwater AV. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;38:68–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dermibas A. Pyrolysis of gound beech wood in irregular heating rate conditions. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2005;73:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ranzi E, Cuoci A, Faravelli T, Frassoldati A, Migliavacca G, Pierucci S, Sommariva S. Chemical kinetics of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuel. 2008;22:4292–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gracia-Perez M, Wang S, Shen J, Rhodes MJ, Lee WJ, Li CZ. Effects of temperature on the formation of lignin-derived oligomers during the fast pyrolysis of Mallee woody biomass. Energy Fuel. 2008;22:2022–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicelluloses, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. 2007;86:1781–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Antal MJ, Gronli M. The art, science and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:1619–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vyazovkin S, Linert W. Kinetic analysis of reversible thermal decomposition of solids. Int J Chem Kinet. 1995;27(1):73–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Di Blasi C. Combustion and gasification rates of lignocellulosic chars. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2009;35:121140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen Q, He R, Xu X, Liang Z, Chen C. Experimental study on pore structure and apparent kinetic parameters of char combustion in kinetics-controlled regime. Energy Fuels. 2004;18:1562–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Senneca O. Kinetics of pyrolysis, combustion and gasification of three biomass fuels. Fuel Process Technol. 2007;88:8797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu H. Combustion of coal chars in O\(_2\)/CO\(_2\) and O\(_2\)/N\(_2\) mixtures: a comparative study with non-isothermal thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) tests. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:4278–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Magdziars A, Wilk M. Thermal characteristics of the combustion process of biomass and sewage sludge. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;114:519–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Babiński P, Labojko G, Kotyczka-Morańska M, Plis A. Kinetics of coal and char oxycombustion studied by TG-FTIR. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:371–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Branca C, Di Blasi C, Horacek H. Analysis of the combustion kinetics and thermal behavior of an intumescent system. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:2107–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Branca C, Di Blasi C. Global kinetics of wood char devolatilization and combustion. Energy Fuels. 2003;17:1609–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Murphy JJ, Shaddix CR. Combustion kinetics of coal chars in oxygen-enriched environments. Combust Flame. 2006;144:710–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang X, Hu Z, Deng S, Wang Y, Tan H. Kinetics investigation on the combustion of biochar in O\(_2\)/CO\(_2\) atmosphere. Environ Progress Sustain Energy. 2014;. doi:10.1002/ep.12063.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Toptas A, Yildirim Y, Duman G, Yanik J. Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:328–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gil MV, Riaza J, Álvarez L, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F. Kinetic models for the oxy-fuel combustion of coal and coalbiomass blend chars obtained in N\(_2\) and CO\(_2\) atmospheres. Energy. 2012;48:510–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wooten JB, Seeman JI, Hajaligol MR. Observation and characterization of cellulose pyrolysis intermediates by 13C CPMAS NMR. A new mechanistic model. Energy Fuel. 2004;18:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Demirbas A. Effect of Temperature on pyrolysis products from biomass. Energy Sources Part A. 2007;29:329–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gheorgue CB, Marculescu C, Badea A, Apostol T. Pyrolysis parameters influencing the bio-char generation from wooden biomass. UPB Sci Bull Ser C. 2010;72:29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S. Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006;30:648–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Obernberger I, Thek G. Physical characterization and chemical composition of densified biomass fuels with regard to their combustion behaviour. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;27:653–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Felfli FF, Luengo CA, Rocha JD. Briquetes torrificados: viabilidade técnico-económica e perspectivas no mercado brasileiro. An. 5. Enc. Energ. Meio Rural, 2004. http://www.proceedings.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=MSC0000000022004000100035&script=sci_arttext.

  53. Hilliring B. Price trends in the Swedish wood fuel market. Biomass Bioenergy. 1997;12:41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge CAPES for financial support and BrBiomassa Company for pellet samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Building Engineering Department, Aeronautical Institute of Technology, Marechal Eduardo Gomes Square 50, São José dos Campos, 12228-900, Brazil

    Lidya B. Santos & Marcelo De Julio

  2. Chemical Engineering Department, National University of Buenos Aires Province Center College Engineering, del Valle Avenue 5737, B7400JWI, Olavarria, Argentina

    Maria V. Striebeck

  3. Analytical Chemistry Department, São Paulo State University IQ/UNESP, Professor Francisco Degni Street 55, Araraquara, 14800-060, Brazil

    Marisa S. Crespi, Jorge M. V. Capela & Clovis A. Ribeiro

Authors
  1. Lidya B. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria V. Striebeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marisa S. Crespi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jorge M. V. Capela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clovis A. Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marcelo De Julio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clovis A. Ribeiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, L.B., Striebeck, M.V., Crespi, M.S. et al. Energy evaluation of biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of pine pellets. J Therm Anal Calorim 126, 1879–1887 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5683-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5683-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation