Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 126, Issue 2, pp 771–784 | Cite as

Investigation of curing kinetics of epoxy resin/novel nanoclay–carbon nanotube hybrids by non-isothermal differential scanning calorimetry

  • Elnaz Esmizadeh
  • Ghasem Naderi
  • Ali Akbar Yousefi
  • Candida Milone


Chemical hybrid of nanoclay (NC)/carbon nanotube (CNT) was synthesized via growth of CNTs by chemical vapor deposition. The cure kinetics of epoxy resin in the presence of novel chemical hybrid of NC/CNT (CNC) was studied by non-isothermal differential scanning calorimetry. The effect of the CNC on cure kinetics was compared with conventional nanofillers such as CNTs, NC, and physical mixture of them (PNC). The kinetic parameters of the cure reaction were determined by iso-conversional method. The accelerating effect of CNT, CNC, and PNC in initial stage of cure reaction was related to the high thermal conductivity of CNTs, while the decelerating effect of nanofillers as the cure proceeded can be attributed to the reduction of polymer molecules motion caused by enhanced viscosity. The apparent activation energy (E α) as the function of conversion (α) was calculated by five methods categorized into two different types: (1) conversion-dependent methods: Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS), Ozawa–Flynn–Wall (OFW), and Friedman; (2) conversion-independent methods: Kissinger and Augis. The accelerating effect of CNT, PNC, and CNC was observable as the reduced E α values in low conversion only with KAS and OFW methods. The reverse trend of E α values was observed with the introduction of these nanofillers at high conversions. The uniqueness of the CNC was more marked in increasing E α values of epoxy after initial stage due to its special 3D structure of CNC. Calculated data using KAS and OFW methods showed the best agreement with the obtained experimental data.


Carbon nanotube–nanoclay hybrid Epoxy Chemical vapor deposition Cure kinetics Non-isothermal 


  1. 1.
    Kotsilkova R, Pissis P. Thermoset nanocomposites for engineering applications. Shrewsbury: Smithers Rapra Technology; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thostenson ET, Chou TW. Processing-structure-multi-functional property relationship in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon. 2006;44:3022–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azeez AA, Rhee KY, Park SJ, Hui D. Epoxy clay nanocomposites—processing, properties and applications: a review. Compos Part B Eng. 2013;45:308–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakandritsos A, Simopoulos A, Petridis D. Carbon nanotube growth on a swellable clay matrix. Chem Mater. 2005;17:3468–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esmizadeh E, Yousefi AA, Naderi G, Milone C. Drastic increase in catalyst productivity of nanoclay-supported CVD-grown carbon nanotubes by organo-modification. Appl Clay Sci. 2015;118:248–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esmizadeh E, Naderi G, Yousefi A, Milone C. Thermal and morphological study of epoxy matrix with chemical and physical hybrid of nanoclay/carbon nanotube. JOM. 2015;2015(08/07):1–12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu L, Grunlan JC. Clay assisted dispersion of carbon nanotubes in conductive epoxy nanocomposites. Adv Func Mater. 2007;17:2343–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun D, Chu CC, Sue HJ. Simple approach for preparation of epoxy hybrid nanocomposites based on carbon nanotubes and a model clay. Chem Mater. 2010;22:3773–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou T, Gu M, Jin Y, Wang J. Isoconversional method to explore the cure reaction mechanisms and curing kinetics of DGEBA/EMI-2, 4/nano-SiC system. J Polym Sci Pol Chem. 2006;44:371–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tao K, Yang S, Grunlan JC, Kim YS, Dang B, Deng Y, et al. Effects of carbon nanotube fillers on the curing processes of epoxy resin-based composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;102:5248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang K, Gu M, Jin Y, Mu G, Pan X. Influence of surface treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes on cure behavior of epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci. 2008;39:1670–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esmizadeh E, Yousefi AA, Naderi G. Effect of type and aspect ratio of different carbon nanotubes on cure behavior of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Iran Polym J. 2015;24:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abdalla M, Dean D, Robinson P, Nyairo E. Cure behavior of epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposites: the effect of nanotube surface modification. Polymer. 2008;49:3310–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seo KS, Kim DS. Curing behavior and structure of an epoxy/clay nanocomposite system. Polym Eng Sci. 2006;46:1318–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li W, Hou L, Zhou Q, Yan L, Loo LS. Curing behavior and rheology properties of alkyl-imidazolium-treated rectorite/epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci. 2013;53:2470–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Becker O, Cheng YB, Varley RJ, Simon GP. Layered silicate nanocomposites based on various high-functionality epoxy resins: the influence of cure temperature on morphology, mechanical properties, and free volume. Macromolecules. 2003;36:1616–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valentini L, Armentano I, Puglia D, Kenny J. Dynamics of amine functionalized nanotubes/epoxy composites by dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. Carbon. 2004;42:323–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park BD, Jeong HW. Cure kinetics of melamine–formaldehyde resin/clay/cellulose nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem. 2010;16:375–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pratap A, Rao TLS, Lad K, Dhurandhar HD. Isoconversional vs. Model fitting methods. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;89:399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zarabadi-Poor P, Badiei A, Yousefi AA, Fahlman BD, Abbasi A. Catalytic chemical vapour deposition of carbon nanotubes using Fe-doped alumina catalysts. Catal Today. 2010;150:100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milone C, Dhanagopal M, Santangelo S, Lanza M, Galvagno S, Messina G. K10 montmorillonite based catalysts for the growth of multiwalled carbon nanotubes through catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:3242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boehm HP. Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon. 1994;32:759–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou T, Wang X, Liu X, Xiong D. Influence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the cure behavior of epoxy-imidazole system. Carbon. 2009;47:1112–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu K, Kandola BK, Kandare E, Hu Y. Flame retardant effect of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane and triglycidyl isocyanurate on glass fibre-reinforced epoxy composites. Polym Compos. 2011;32:378–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Santangelo S, Gorrasi G, Di Lieto R, De Pasquale S, Patimo G, Piperopoulos E, et al. Polylactide and carbon nanotubes/smectite-clay nanocomposites: preparation, characterization, sorptive and electrical properties. Appl Clay Sci. 2011;53:188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schaper AK, Hou H, Greiner A, Phillipp F. The role of iron carbide in multiwalled carbon nanotube growth. J Catal. 2004;222:250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim MS, Kim GH, Chowdhury SR. Polybutadiene rubber/organoclay nanocomposites: effect of organoclay with various modifier concentrations on the vulcanization behavior and mechanical properties. Polym Eng Sci. 2007;47:308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madaleno L, Pyrz R, Jensen LR, Pinto JJ, Lopes AB, Dolomanova V, et al. Synthesis of clay–carbon nanotube hybrids: growth of carbon nanotubes in different types of iron modified montmorillonite. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72:377–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohan TP, Ramesh Kumar M, Velmurugan R. Rheology and curing characteristics of epoxy–clay nanocomposites. Polym Int. 2005;54:1653–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun L, Boo WJ, Liu J, Clearfield A, Sue HJ, Verghese NE, et al. Effect of nanoplatelets on the rheological behavior of epoxy monomers. Macromol Mater Eng. 2009;294:103–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arora R, Singh N, Balasubramanian K, Alegaonkar P. Electroless nickel coated nano-clay for electrolytic removal of Hg(ii) ions. RSC Adv. 2014;4:50614–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang WD, Phang IY, Liu T. Growth of carbon nanotubes on clay: unique nanostructured filler for high-performance polymer nanocomposites. Adv Mater. 2006;18:73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bae J, Jang J, Yoon SH. Cure behavior of the liquid crystalline epoxy/carbon nanotube system and the effect of surface treatment of carbon fillers on cure reaction. Macromol Chem Phys. 2002;203:2196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen S, Hsu SH, Wu MC, Su WF. Kinetics studies on the accelerated curing of liquid crystalline epoxy resin/multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Polym Sci Pol Phys. 2011;49:301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vahedi V, Pasbakhsh P, Chai SP. Toward high performance epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites: new insights based on rheological, curing, and impact properties. Mater Des. 2015;68:42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xie H, Liu B, Yuan Z, Shen J, Cheng R. Cure kinetics of carbon nanotube/tetrafunctional epoxy nanocomposites by isothermal differential scanning calorimetry. J Polym Sci Pol Phys. 2004;42:3701–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhao S, Zhang G, Sun R, Wong C. Curing kinetics, mechanism and chemorheological behavior of methanol etherified amino/novolac epoxy systems. Express Polym Lett. 2014;8:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Han SO, Drzal LT. Curing characteristics of carboxyl functionalized glucose resin and epoxy resin. Eur Polym J. 2003;39:1377–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cid del García M, Prolongo M, Salom C, Arribas C, Sánchez-Cabezudo M, Masegosa R. The effect of stoichiometry on curing and properties of epoxy–clay nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;108:741–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yoo MJ, Kim SH, Park SD, Lee WS, Sun J-W, Choi J-H, et al. Investigation of curing kinetics of various cycloaliphatic epoxy resins using dynamic thermal analysis. Eur Polym J. 2010;46:1158–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Román F, Montserrat S, Hutchinson J. On the effect of montmorillonite in the curing reaction of epoxy nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;87:113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jubsilp C, Damrongsakkul S, Takeichi T, Rimdusit S. Curing kinetics of arylamine-based polyfunctional benzoxazine resins by dynamic differential scanning calorimetry. Thermochim Acta. 2006;447:131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhou T, Gu M, Jin Y, Wang J. Studying on the curing kinetics of a DGEBA/EMI-2,4/nano-sized carborundum system with two curing kinetic methods. Polymer. 2005;46:6174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elnaz Esmizadeh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ghasem Naderi
    • 2
  • Ali Akbar Yousefi
    • 2
  • Candida Milone
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Science and TechnologyUniversity of BonabBonabIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Polymer ProcessingIran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute (IPPI)TehranIran
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettronica, Chimica e Ingegneria IndustrialeUniversità di MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations