Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 1209–1219 | Cite as

Application of thermal analysis for evaluating the digestion of microwave pre-treated sewage sludge

  • E. J. Martínez
  • M. V. Gil
  • J. G. Rosas
  • R. Moreno
  • R. Mateos
  • A. Morán
  • X. Gómez
Article

Abstract

The effect of microwave pre-treatment (MwP) on anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge was studied by means of thermal analysis and evolved gas analysis. The effect of the pre-treatment at low energy input (<1000 kJ L−1) on sludge solubilisation was studied with the aid of response surface methodology. The pre-treatment process was subsequently studied at energies of 488–2700 kJ L−1 to evaluate the improvement in biogas production under mesophilic conditions. Organic matter modifications were studied using a Setaram TGA92 analyser at atmospheric pressure coupled to an MSC200 quadrupole mass spectrometer from Balzers. Particle size analysis was carried out using a Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyser LS 13 320 Beckmann Coulter for evaluating the effect of MwP on sludge particles. Results showed an increase in organic matter solubilisation with the increase in the energy applied. Modifications in the specific surface area of the organic matter due to the MwP resulted in increments in methane yields. However, an accumulation of complex compounds was observed in thermal profiles at the maximum energy input (2700 kJ L−1). Semi-continuous digestion experiments were evaluated using as substrate pre-treated sludge at the optimum energy value (975 kJ L−1). Results showed a significant increase in methane yield (43 %) when evaluating the process at hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 25–10 days.

Keywords

Sewage sludge Anaerobic digestion Microwave pre-treatment Thermal analysis Particle size analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by the financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through the project CTQ2015-68925-R. R. Moreno acknowledges financial support from the Junta de Castilla y León (Orden EDU/828/2014) co-financed by the European Social Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Provenzano MR, Malerba AD, Buscaroli A, Zannoni D, Senesi N. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111:1861–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carrère H, Dumas C, Battimelli A, Batstone DJ, Delgenès JP, Steyer JP, Ferrer I. Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2010;183:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ara E, Sartaj M, Kennedy K. Effect of microwave pre-treatment of thickened waste activated sludge on biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, thickened waste activated sludge and municipal sludge. Waste Manag Res. 2014;32:1200–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bougrier C, Battimelli A, Delgenes J-P, Carrere H. Combined ozone pretreatment and anaerobic digestion for the reduction of biological sludge production in wastewater treatment. Ozone Sci Eng. 2007;29:201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braguglia CM, Mininni G, Gianico A. Is sonication effective to improve biogas production and solids reduction in excess sludge digestion? Water Sci Technol. 2008;57:479–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erden G, Filibeli A. Ultrasonic pre-treatment of biological sludge: consequences for disintegration, anaerobic biodegradability, and filterability. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2010;85:145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beszédes S, László Z, Horváth ZH, Szabó G, Hodúr C. Comparison of the effects of microwave irradiation with different intensities on the biodegradability of sludge from the dairy- and meat-industry. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:814–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eskicioglu C, Kennedy KJ, Droste RL. Enhanced disinfection and methane production from sewage sludge by microwave irradiation. Desalination. 2009;248:279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park WJ, Ahn JH. Optimization of microwave pretreatment conditions to maximize methane production and methane yield in mesophilic anaerobic sludge digestion. Environ Technol. 2011;32:1533–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong SM, Park JK, Lee YO. Mechanisms of microwave irradiation involved in the destruction of fecal coliforms from biosolids. Water Res. 2004;38:1615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toreci I, Kennedy KJ, Droste RL. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic anaerobic sludge digestion after high temperature microwave pretreatment. Water Res. 2009;43:1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Remya N, Lin JG. Current status of microwave application in wastewater treatment—a review. Chem Eng J. 2011;166:797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tyagi VK, Lo S-L. Microwave irradiation: a sustainable way for sludge treatment and resource recovery. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;18:288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cella MA, Akgul D, Eskicioglu C. Assessment of microbial viability in municipal sludge following ultrasound and microwave pretreatments and resulting impacts on the efficiency of anaerobic sludge digestion. App Microbiol Biot. 2016;100:2855–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yeneneh AM, Kayaalp A, Sen TK, Ang HM. Effect of combined microwave-ultrasonic pretreatment of real mixed sludge on the enhancement of anaerobic digester performance. Water Air Soil Poll. 2015;226:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jang JH, Ahn JH. High-temperature microwave NaOH pretreatment of waste-activated sludge for anaerobic digestion. J Environ Eng. 2015;141:06015002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Costa JC, Oliveira JV, Alves MM. Response surface design to study the influence of inoculum, particle size and inoculum to substrate ratio on the methane production from Ulex sp. Renew Energy. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.028.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang Q, Zhong Y, Zhong H, Li X, Du W, Li X, Chen R, Zeng G. A novel pretreatment process of mature landfill leachate with ultrasonic activated persulfate: optimization using integrated Taguchi method and response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ. 2015;98:268–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gascó G, Paz-Ferreiro J, Méndez A. Thermal analysis of soil amended with sewage sludge and biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;108:769–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Almeida S, Santos DV, Crespi MS, Bernabé G. Characterization and thermal study of organic extracts of urban solid waste. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rodríguez-Abalde Á, Gómez X, Blanco D, Cuetos MJ, Fernández B, Flotats X. Study of thermal pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste by TGA-MS and FTIR spectroscopy. Waste Manag Res. 2013;31:1195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Otero M, Sánchez ME, Gómez X. Co-firing of coal and manure biomass: a TG–MS approach. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:8304–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rani RU, Kumar SA, Kaliappan S, Yeom I, Banu JR. Impacts of microwave pretreatments on the semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of dairy waste activated sludge. Waste Manag. 2013;33:1119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahn JH, Shin SG, Hwang S. Effect of microwave irradiation on the disintegration and acidogenesis of municipal secondary sludge. Chem Eng J. 2009;153:145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ebenezer AV, Kaliappan S, Kumar SA, Yeom IT, Banu JR. Influence of deflocculation on microwave disintegration and anaerobic biodegradability of waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2015;185:194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cuetos MJ, Gómez X, Escapa A, Morán A. Evaluation and simultaneous optimization of bio-hydrogen production using 32 factorial design and the desirability function. J Power Sources. 2007;169:131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mehdizadeh SN, Eskicioglu C, Bobowski J, Johnson T. Conductive heating and microwave hydrolysis under identical heating profiles for advanced anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge. Water Res. 2013;47:5040–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Federation WE, Association APH. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martínez EJ, Rosas JG, Morán A, Gómez X. Effect of ultrasound pretreatment on sludge digestion and dewatering characteristics: application of particle size analysis. Water. 2015;7:6483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arenillas A, Rubiera F, Arias B, Pis JJ, Faundez JM, Gordon AL, et al. A TG/DTA study on the effect of coal blending on ignition behaviour. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;76:603–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chan YJ, Chong MF, Law CL, Hassell DG. A review on anaerobic–aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chem Eng J. 2009;155:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klammer S, Knapp B, Insam H, Dell’Abate MT, Ros M. Bacterial community patterns and thermal analyses of composts of various origins. Waste Manag Res. 2008;26:173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Torquato LM, Braz CEM, Ribeiro CA, Capela JMV, Crespi MS. Kinetic study of the co-firing of bagasse–sludge blends. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park B, Ahn J, Kim J, Hwang S. Use of microwave pretreatment for enhanced anaerobiosis of secondary sludge. Water Sci Technol. 2004;50:17–23.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eskicioglu C, Droste RL, Kennedy KJ. Performance of anaerobic waste activated sludge digesters after microwave pretreatment. Water Environ Res. 2007;79:2265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Park WJ, Ahn JH. Effects of microwave pretreatment on mesophilic anaerobic digestion for mixture of primary and secondary sludges compared with thermal pretreatment. Environ Eng Res. 2011;16:103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Martínez
    • 1
  • M. V. Gil
    • 2
  • J. G. Rosas
    • 1
  • R. Moreno
    • 1
  • R. Mateos
    • 1
  • A. Morán
    • 1
  • X. Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical and Environmental Bioprocess Engineering Group, Natural Resources Institute (IRENA)University of LeonLeónSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional del CarbónINCAR-CSICOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations