Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 1503–1514 | Cite as

Synthesis and characterization of graphene sheets grafted with linear triblock copolymers based on methacrylate ester

  • Bo Lin
  • Lan Liu
  • Wenzhen Chen
  • Huiming Luo
  • Xinli Yang


Two different linear triblock polymer-grafted graphene sheets (GSs) had been synthesized by chemical surface modification reaction. The linear terpolymers PtBMA101-b-PGMA19-b-PSt100 and PtBMA127-b-PHEMA21-b-PDMAEMA132 had been synthesized by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer process and with their narrow polydispersity index M w/M n of 1.25 and 1.33, respectively. The results of FTIR showed that the characteristic peak area of hydroxyl in the PtBMA127-g-GS-g-PDMAEMA132 was less than that of the graphite oxide (GO), while the signal of the aromatic ring at 710 cm−1 (from 750 to 690 cm−1) displayed in the PtBMA101-g-GS-g-PSt100. The ratio of the intensities (I D/I G) for the GSs in Raman spectra was markedly increased compared with that of the pristine GO. Both illuminated that the two different terpolymers had taken chemically covalent graft on the surface of the GO. The polymer grafting efficiency in the composite GSs was 44 and 42 mass% determined by thermogravimetry for PtBMA127-g-GS-g-PDMAEMA132 and PtBMA101-g-GS-g-PSt100, respectively. Friedman’s analysis showed that the apparent activation energies of the PtBMA101-g-GS-g-PSt100 were higher than those of the PtBMA127-g-GS-g-PDMAEMA132 during the thermal decomposition, because of the existence of the benzene ring for the former. The results from rheological analysis showed that the amphiphilic GSs solutions both displayed an obvious pseudoplastic fluid behavior, the existence of benzene ring in the amphiphilic PtBMA101-g-GS-g-PSt100 made the flowability of solution even worse than that of the amphiphilic PtBMA127-g-GS-g-PDMAEMA132 solution according to the same content of the GSs, and meanwhile, the flexible polymer arms of the PtBMA and PDMAEMA made the viscosity more sensitive to the shear rate for the PtBMA127-g-GS-g-PDMAEMA132.


RAFT Linear triblock copolymer Graphene Thermogravimetry Friedman analysis 



B.L. gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21204012) and the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. S2012040007981).


  1. 1.
    Shen JF, Hu YZ, Li C, Qin C, Ye MX. Synthesis of amphiphilic graphene nanoplatelets. Small. 2009;5:82–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo SJ, Dong SJ. Graphene nanosheet: synthesis, molecular engineering, thin film, hybrids, and energy and analytical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:2644–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He FA, Fan JT, Song F, Zhang LM, Chan LWH. Fabrication of hybrids based on graphene and metal nanoparticles by in situ and self-assembled methods. Nanoscale. 2011;3:710–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen YN, Star A, Vidal S. Sweet carbon nanostructures: carbohydrate conjugates with carbon nanotubes and graphene and their applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:4532–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niu SY, Sun J, Nan CC, Lin JH. Sensitive DNA biosensor improved by 1,10-phenanthroline cobalt complex as indicator based on the electrode modified by gold nanoparticles and graphene. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;176:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alhwaige AA, Agag T, Ishida H, Qutubuddin S. Biobased chitosan hybrid aerogels with superior adsorption: role of graphene oxide in CO2 capture. RSC Adv. 2013;3:16011–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tour JM. Top-down versus bottom-up fabrication of graphene-based electronics. Chem Mater. 2014;26:163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang L, Niu TC, Lu XQ, Dong HL, Chen W, Liu YQ, Hu WP, Zhu DB. Low-temperature, bottom-up synthesis of graphene via a radical-coupling reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:9050–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pumera M, Wong CHA. Graphane and hydrogenated graphene. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:5987–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards RS, Coleman KS. Graphene synthesis: relationship to applications. Nanoscale. 2013;5:38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park SJ, Ruoff RS. Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4:217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang JH, Pham VH, Hur SH, Chung JS. Dispersibility of reduced alkylamine-functionalized graphene oxides in organic solvents. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;424:62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paredes JI, Villar-Rodil S, Martinez-Alonso A, Tascon JMD. Graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents. Langmuir. 2008;24:10560–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fang M, Wang KG, Lu HB, Yang YL, Nutt S. Covalent polymer functionalization of graphene nanosheets and mechanical properties of composites. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:7098–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cote LJ, Kim F, Huang JX. Langmuir–Blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:1043–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Min YJ, Akbulut M, Kristiansen K, Golan Y, Israelachvili J. The role of interparticle and external forces in nanoparticle assembly. Nat Mater. 2008;7:527–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konatham D, Striolo A. Molecular design of stable graphene nanosheets dispersions. Nano Lett. 2008;8:4630–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mittal V. Polymer-graphene nanocomposites, RSC Nanoscience & Nanotechnology No. 26. The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun X, Dai H. PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10876–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salavagione HJ, Gomez MA, Martinez G. Polymeric modification of graphene through esterification of graphite oxide and poly(vinyl alcohol). Macromolecules. 2009;42:6331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu D, Dai L. Self-assembled graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid films for supercapacitors. J Phys Chem Lett. 2010;1:467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu D, Yang Y, Durstock M, Baek JB, Da L. Soluble P3HT-grafted graphene for efficient bilayer-heterojunction photovoltaic devices. ACS Nano. 2010;4:5633–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fang M, Zhang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Lu H, Yang Y. Constructing hierarchically structured interphases for strong and tough epoxy nanocomposites by amine-rich graphene surfaces. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:9635–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shan C, Yang H, Han D, Zhang Q, Ivaska A, Niu L. Water-soluble graphene covalently functionalized by biocompatible poly-l-lysine. Langmuir. 2009;25:12030–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He H, Gao C. General approach to individually dispersed, highly soluble, and conductive graphene nanosheets functionalized by nitrene chemistry. Chem Mater. 2010;22:5054–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu X, Luo Q, Lv W, Dong Y, Lin Y, Yang Q, Shen A, Pang D, Hu J, Qin J, Li Z. Functionalization of graphene sheets by polyacetylene: convenient synthesis and enhanced emission. Macromol Chem Phys. 2011;212:768–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pan Y, Bao H, Sahoo NG, Wu T, Li L. Water-Soluble Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-Graphene sheets synthesized via click chemistry for drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:2754–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Le TPT, Moad G, Rizzardo E, Thang SH. PCT International Patent Application WO 9801478 A1 980115; 1998.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hummers WS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Österholma A, Lindforsa T, Kauppilab J, Damlinb P, Kvarnströmb C. Electrochemical incorporation of graphene oxide into conducting polymer films. Electrochim Acta. 2012;83:463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferrari AC, Robertson D. Multi-wavelength Raman spectroscopy of carbon. Phys Rev B. 2000;61:14095–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA, Car R. Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 2008;8:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watcharotone S, Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Piner R, Jung I, Dommett GHB, Evmenenko G, Wu SE, Chen SF, Liu CP, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS. Graphene-silica composite thin films as transparent conductors. Nano Lett. 2007;7:1888–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu J, Zhang F. Self-assembled fabrication and flame-retardant properties of reduced graphene oxide/waterborne polyurethane nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:561–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ke HZ, Pang ZY, Xu YF, Chen XD, Fu JP, Cai YB, Huang FL, Wei QF. Graphene oxide improved thermal and mechanical properties of electrospun methyl stearate/polyacrylonitrile form-stable phase change composite nanofibers. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lin YC, Cao Y, Jang JH, Shu CM, Webb C, Pan WP. The synthesis and characterization of graphene oxides based on a modified approach. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;116:1249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haghighi AH, Sheydaei M, Allahbakhsh A, Ghatarband M, Hosseini FS. Thermal performance of poly(ethylene disulfide)/expanded graphite nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:525–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Friedman HL. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-foaming plastics from thermogravimetry: application to a phenolic resin. J Polym Sci. 1965;6C:183–95.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lin B, Zhang HD, Yang YL. Synthesis and thermal analysis of linear triblock copolymers based on methacrylate ester. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;107:355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mothé CG, de Miranda IC. Study of kinetic parameters of thermal decomposition of bagasse and sugarcane straw using Friedman and Ozawa-Flynn-Wall isoconversional methods. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rajeshwari P, Dey TK. Structural and thermal properties of HDPE/n-AlN polymer nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:1513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang XL, Zhan YQ, Zhao R, Liu XB. Effects of graphene nanosheets on the dielectric, mechanical, thermal properties, and rheological behaviors of poly(arylene ether nitriles). J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;124:1723–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Lin
    • 1
  • Lan Liu
    • 1
  • Wenzhen Chen
    • 1
  • Huiming Luo
    • 1
  • Xinli Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Chemical EngineeringGuangdong University of Petrochemical TechnologyMaomingChina

Personalised recommendations