Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 122, Issue 2, pp 831–842 | Cite as

A comparison study on melting inside the rectangular and curved unit with a vertical heating wall

  • Zhipei Hu
  • Angui Li
  • Ran Gao
  • Haiguo Yin


Efficient and rational use of thermal energy requires the design and development of suitable and cost-effective latent heat storage systems. In this study, a novel curved thermal storage unit is put forward and its thermal behavior has been numerically compared with the traditional rectangular PCM-based thermal storage unit. The solid–liquid interface evolution, liquid flow pattern and temperature distribution are presented. Transient Nu at the heating wall and full melting time are also calculated. The numerical results show the high impact of the enclosure geometry on melting and nature convection. A reduction of 30.6 % in thermal storage time has been achieved by changing the unit from rectangular to curve. Moreover, parametric studies are conducted to assess how thermal performance of the units is affected by the heating wall temperature and PCM thermal conductivity. Correlations encompassing a wide range of parameters are developed in terms of full melting time. Results indicate that proportion of full melting time reduced for the curved unit is almost a constant value and does not vary significantly with these factors. All these may be very helpful for the design of more efficient thermal storage units.


Curved unit Melting Heat transfer Phase change material (PCM) Rectangular unit 



Support from the National Science and Technology Supporting Program (No. 2011BAJ03B03) in this study is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Bayón R, Rojas E, Valenzuela L, Zarza E, León J. Analysis of the experimental behaviour of a 100 kWth latent heat storage system for direct steam generation in solar thermal power plants. Appl Therm Eng. 2010;30:2643–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shon J, Kim H, Lee K. Improved heat storage rate for an automobile coolant waste heat recovery system using phase-change material in a fin-tube heat exchanger. Appl Energy. 2014;113:680–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahmoud S, Tang A, Toh C, AL-Dadah R, Soo SL. Experimental investigation of inserts configurations and PCM type on the thermal performance of PCM based heat sinks. Appl Energy. 2013;112:1349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeon J, Lee JH, Seo J, Jeong SG, Kim S. Application of PCM thermal energy storage system to reduce building energy consumption. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111:279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fan L, Khodadadi JM. Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jegadheeswaran S, Pohekar SD. Performance enhancement in latent heat thermal storage system: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13:2225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho CJ, Viskanta R. Heat transfer during melting from an isothermal vertical wall. J Heat Trans ASME. 1984;106:12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gau C, Viskanta R. Melting and solidification of a pure metal on a vertical wall. J Heat Trans ASME. 1986;108:174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Y, Amiri A, Vafai K. An experimental investigation of the melting process in a rectangular enclosure. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1999;42:3659–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhaidan NS, Khodadadi JM, Al-Hattab A, Al-Mashat M. Experimental and numerical investigation of melting of phase change material/nanoparticle suspensions in a square container subjected to a constant heat flux. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;66:672–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shokouhmand H, Kamkari B. Experimental investigation on melting heat transfer characteristics of lauric acid in a rectangular thermal storage unit. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2013;50:201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Omari KE, Kousksou T, Guer YL. Impact of shape of container on natural convection and melting inside enclosures used for passive cooling of electronic devices. Appl Therm Eng. 2011;31:3022–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darzi AR, Farhadi M, Sedighi K. Numerical study of melting inside concentric and eccentric horizontal annulus. Appl Math Model. 2012;36:4080–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akgün M, Aydın O, Kaygusuz K. Thermal energy storage performance of paraffin in a novel tube-in-shell system. Appl Therm Eng. 2008;28:405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koizumi H, Jin Y. Performance enhancement of a latent heat thermal energy storage system using curved-slab containers. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;37:145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Voller VR, Prakash C. A fixed grid numerical modelling methodology for convection–diffusion mushy region phase-change problems. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1987;30:1709–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hannoun N, Alexiades V, Mai TZ. A reference solution for phase change with convection. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2005;48:1283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pal D, Joshi YK. Melting in a side heated tall enclosure by a uniformly dissipating heat source. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2001;44:375–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarı A, Karaipekli A, Alkan C. Preparation, characterization and thermal properties of lauric acid/expanded perlite as novel form-stable composite phase change material. Chem Eng. 2009;155:899–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen Z, Shan F, Cao L, Fang G. Synthesis and thermal properties of shape-stabilized lauric acid/activated carbon composites as phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2012;102:131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental and Municipal EngineeringXi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations