Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 1877–1882 | Cite as

The isothermal studies of char-CO2 gasification using the high-pressure thermo-gravimetric method



The char-CO2 gasification reactions in isothermal and pressurized conditions were studied kinetically by high-pressure thermo-gravimetric analyzer, and the primary objective of this paper was to study the effects of pressure, temperature and char rank on the intrinsic reaction kinetics of the char-CO2 gasification by the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model. The results indicated that the order of reactivity sequence at the same temperature and pressure was Char A > Char B > Char C (Char A from subbituminous coal, and Char B and C from bituminous coals). With the increase in the pressure and temperature, both the intrinsic reaction rate at the same carbon conversion and the carbon conversion efficiency at the same reaction time increased. The results also showed that the gasification rate experienced an initially slow increase, followed by a rapid increase, and finally a decrease corresponding to the increase in the carbon conversion efficiency. It implied that the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model was incompatible to thorough presentation of the complete conversion of the char-CO2 gasification, but was well agreeable to the intrinsic reaction kinetics of char-CO2 gasification when the carbon conversion efficiency was low at the initial stage of the carbon conversion (0–0.6). Based on this, the intrinsic reaction kinetic models of the selected char samples were built.


Char gasification CO2 HP-TGA Intrinsic kinetics 



This work was performed under KEEC funds (Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet Research Fund 2013–2014, PON2 127 1300002875 1).


  1. 1.
    Mani T, Mahinpey N, Murugan P. Reaction kinetics and mass transfer studies of biomass char gasification with CO2. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66(1):36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Núñez-Regueira L, Rodriguez-Anon J, Proupin J, Mourino B, Artiaga-Diaz R. Energetic study of residual forest biomass using calorimetry and thermal analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;80(2):457–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nowak B, Karlström O, Backman P, Brink A, Zevenhoven M, Voglsam S, et al. Mass transfer limitation in thermogravimetry of biomass gasification. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(1):183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomaszewicz M, Łabojko G, Tomaszewicz G, Kotyczka-Morańska M. The kinetics of CO2 gasification of coal chars. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113(3):1327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granada E, Eguía P, Comesaña J, Patiño D, Porteiro J, Miguez J. Devolatilization behaviour and pyrolysis kinetic modelling of Spanish biomass fuels. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113(2):569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng J, Wang K, Zhang Y, Yang H. Study on the kinetics and reactivity at the ignition temperature of Jurassic coal in North Shaanxi. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118(1):417–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin L, Strand M. Investigation of the intrinsic CO2 gasification kinetics of biomass char at medium to high temperatures. Appl Energy. 2013;109:220–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ion IV, Popescu F, Rolea GG. A biomass pyrolysis model for CFD application. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(3):1811–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fan D, Zhu Z, Na Y, Lu Q. Thermogravimetric analysis of gasification reactivity of coal chars with steam and CO2 at moderate temperatures. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113(2):599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hodge EM, Roberts DG, Harris DJ, Stubington JF. The significance of char morphology to the analysis of high-temperature Char-CO2 reaction rates†. Energy Fuels. 2009;24(1):100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim YT, Seo DK, Hwang J. Study of the effect of coal type and particle size on char-CO2 gasification via gas analysis. Energy Fuels. 2011;25(11):5044–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen C, Wang J, Liu W, Zhang S, Yin J, Luo G, et al. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the char gasification with mixtures of CO2 and H2O. Proc Combust Inst. 2013;34(2):2453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babiński P, Łabojko G, Kotyczka-Morańska M, Plis A. Kinetics of coal and char oxycombustion studied by TG–FTIR. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113(1):371–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Q, Li Q, Zhang L, Fang Y, Wang Z. Experimental and kinetic investigation of the pyrolysis, combustion, and gasification of deoiled asphalt. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115(2):1929–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suriapparao DV, Ojha DK, Ray T, Vinu R. Kinetic analysis of co-pyrolysis of cellulose and polypropylene. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117(3):1441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris DJ, Smith IW, editors. Intrinsic reactivity of petroleum coke and brown coal char to carbon dioxide, steam and oxygen. Symposium (International) on Combustion; 1991: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kasaoka S, Sakata Y, Tong C. Kinetic evaluation of the reactivity of various coal chars for gasification with carbon dioxide in comparison with steam. Int Chem Eng (United States). 1985;25(1):160–175.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barrio M, Hustad J. CO2 gasification of birch char and the effect of CO inhibition on the calculation of chemical kinetics. Prog Thermochem Biomass Convers. 2001;1:47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Radović LR, Walker PL Jr, Jenkins RG. Importance of carbon active sites in the gasification of coal chars. Fuel. 1983;62(7):849–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu W, Song W, Lin W. Catalytic gasification of char from co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass. Fuel Process Technol. 2008;89(9):890–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saito Y, Kuwata K, Suzuki K, Suzuki T. Sulfuric acid intercalation and exfoliation of nano shell carbon from Ni-catalyzed wood char. Trans Mater Res Soc Jpn. 2011;36(3):425–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu J, Liu L, Cui M, Wang J. Calcium-promoted catalytic activity of potassium carbonate for gasification of coal char: the synergistic effect unrelated to mineral matter in coal. Fuel. 2013;111:628–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts D, Harris D. Char gasification with O2, CO2, and H2O: effects of pressure on intrinsic reaction kinetics. Energy Fuels. 2000;14(2):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roberts D, Harris D. A kinetic analysis of coal char gasification reactions at high pressures. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(6):2314–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts D, Harris D. High-pressure char gasification kinetics: CO inhibition of the C–CO2 reaction. Energy Fuels. 2011;26(1):176–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laurendeau NM. Heterogeneous kinetics of coal char gasification and combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 1978;4(4):221–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hüttinger KJ, Nill JS. A method for the determination of active sites and true activation energies in carbon gasification:(II) experimental results. Carbon. 1990;28(4):457–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roberts D, Harris D, Wall T. On the effects of high pressure and heating rate during coal pyrolysis on char gasification reactivity. Energy Fuels. 2003;17(4):887–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Material Science and EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Institute for Combustion Science and Environmental TechnologyWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations