Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 1127–1131 | Cite as

Effect of particle-size distribution on the surface appearance of glazed surface

  • Jiyuan Li
  • Jinsheng Liang
  • Lijuan Wang
  • Fei Wang
Article

Abstract

Glazes have great influence on most of the final properties of sanitary wares, such as color, glossy, and surface roughness. Generally, these properties have been changed by chemical composition and firing parameters. In addition, the selection of particle-size distribution of raw glaze can affect on the surface appearance and cleanability of glazed surface. In this paper, raw glazes were milled in ball mill for different time. Prepared glaze slurry was applied to green bodies, later dried and fired. The same glaze was also uniaxially pressed to form cylindrical sample; the specimen was placed on substrate surface and fired in hot stage microscope. The glaze evolution upon heating was recorded by CCD camera, the contact angle between molten glaze and substrate was measured to determine the wettability. The results showed that particle-size distributions have great influence on the melting behavior of glaze and the surface appearance of glazed ceramics.

Keywords

Glaze Particle-size distribution Cleanability Milling Wettability Sanitary ware 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of the Republic of China (Grant No. 2011BAE30B04).

References

  1. 1.
    Hupa L, Bergman R, Fröberg L, Vane-Tempest S, Hupa M, Kronberg T, Pesonen-Leinonen E, Sjöberg A-M. Chemical resistance and cleanability of glazed surfaces. Surf Sci. 2005;584:113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fröberg L, Hupa L, Hupa M. Corrosion of the crystalline phases of matte glazes in aqueous solutions. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2009;29:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fröberg L, Kronberg T, Hupa L. Effect of soaking time on phase composition and topography and surface microstructure in vitro crystalline whiteware glazes. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2009;29:2153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piispanen M, Kronberg T, Areva S, Hupa L. Effect of mechanical and chemical wear on soil attachment and cleanability of sanitary ware with additional coatings. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2011;94:951–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maatta J, Piispanen M, Kuisma R, Kymalainen H-R, Uusi-Rauva A, Hurme K, Areva S, Sjöberg A-M, Hupa L. Effect of coating on cleanability of glazed surfaces. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:4555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuisma R, Fröberg L, Kymalainen H-R, Pesonen-Leinonen E, Piispanen M, Melamies P, Hautala M, Sjöberg A-M, Hupa L. Microstructure and cleanability of uncoated and fluoropolymer, zirconia and titania coated ceramic glazed surfaces. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maatta J, Piispanen M, Kymalainen H-R, Uusi-Rauva A, Hurme K-R, Areva S, Sjöberg A-M, Hupa L. Effects of UV-radiation on the cleanability of titanium dioxide-coated glazed ceramic tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:4569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitsuyoshi M, Keiichiro N, Tamon K. Antibacterial activity of photocatalytic titanium dioxide thin films with photodeposited silver on the surface of sanitary ware. J Am Ceram Soc. 2004;88:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kronberg T, Ritschoff A-C, Mahlberg R, Mannila J, Kallio M, Vesa A, Hupa L. Soil-resistance surfaces for traditional ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:1755–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piispanen M, Maatta J, Areva S, Sjöberg A-M, Hupa M, Hupa L. Chemical resistance and cleaning properties of coated glazed surfaces. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2009;29:1855–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Partyka J, Lis J. The influence of the grain size distribution of raw materials on the selected surface properties of sanitary glazes. Ceram Int. 2011;37:1285–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernardin AM. The influence of particle size distribution on the surface appearance of glazed tiles. Dyes Pigment. 2009;80:121–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schabbach LM, Bondioli F, Ferrari AM, Manfredini T, Petter CO, Fredel MC. Color in ceramic glazes: analysis of pigment and opacifier grain size distribution effect by spectrophotometer. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28:1777–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinosa JJ, Rubio-Marcos F, Solera E, Bengochea MA, Fernandez JF. Sintering behaviour of nanostructured glass-ceramic glazes. Ceram Int. 2010;36:1845–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paganelli M. Measuring surface tension of glass. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 2003;9:9201–4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Froberg L, Kronberg T, Hupa L, Hupa M. Influence of firing parameters on phase composition of raw glazes. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:1671–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pascual MJ, Durán A. A new method for determining fixed viscosity points of glasses. Phys Chem Glasses. 2005;46:512–20.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marquez JM, Rincon JM, Romero M. Effect of firing temperature on sintering of porcelain stoneware tiles. Ceram Int. 2008;34:1867–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakizci M, Alver BE, Yorukogullari E. Thermal and SO2 adsorption properties of some clays from Turkey. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;103:435–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karamanov A, Karamanov E, Ferrari AM, Ferrante F, Pelino M. The effect of fired scrap addition on the sintering behavior of hard porcelain. Ceram Int. 2006;32:727–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiyuan Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jinsheng Liang
    • 1
  • Lijuan Wang
    • 1
  • Fei Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Power Source and Ecomaterials ScienceHebei University of TechnologyTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringTianjin Institute of Urban ConstructionTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations