Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 1465–1474 | Cite as

A comparative study on cement hydration and microstructure of cement paste incorporating aminosulfonate–phenol–salicylic acid–formaldehyde and aminosulfonate–phenol–formaldehyde polymer

  • Hui Zhao
  • Ming Deng
  • Mingshu Tang
Article

Abstract

In this article, the water-soluble aminosulfonate–phenol–salicylic acid–formaldehyde (AH) polymer and aminosulfonate–phenol–formaldehyde polymer (AS) were incorporated into cement paste, and the effect of AH polymer on cement hydration and microstructure of cement paste was compared with AS polymer by means of isothermal calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, mercury intrusion porosimetry, and scanning electron microscopy. The test results showed that the incorporation of AH and AS polymers into cement paste retards the rate of hydration reaction and reduces the amount of hydration products at early stages of hydration. The use of AH and AS polymers into cement paste also improves pore structure of cement paste. The pore size distribution of cement paste shifts toward smaller pore size scope. A smaller particle size of hydration product can be found in cement paste with AH and AS polymers. The cement paste with AH and AS polymers has a higher pore volume and total porosity. The surface morphologies of cement paste with AH and AS polymers are looser and more homogeneous than blank cement paste. Moreover, at the same dosage of polymer, the effect of AH polymer on the cement hydration and microstructure of cement paste was more significant than that of AS polymer.

Keywords

Comparative study Polymer Cement hydration Microstructure Cement paste 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jiangsu Bote Co, Ltd for providing AS polymer. The authors thank Ming Deng, Professor of the Nanjing University of Technology, whose sponsorship made this study possible.

References

  1. 1.
    Pierre Claude, AõÈtcin. Cements of yesterday and today Concrete of tomorrow. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(9):1349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collepardi M, Valente M. Recent developments in superplasticizers. Eighth CANMET/ACI International Conference, superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete.USA: American Concrete Institute; 2006. pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aitcin PC, Jolicoeur C, MacGregor JG. Superplasticizers; how they work and why they occasionally don’t? Concr Intern. 1994;16(8):45–52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Etsuo Sakai, Atsumu Ishida, Akrira Ohta. New trend in the development of concrete admixtures in Japan. J Adv Concr Technol. 2006;4(2):211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paillere AM. Application of admixtures in concrete. London: Spon; 1996. p. 56–68.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim G-G, Hong SS, Kim D-S, Lee B-J, Rho J-S. Slump loss control of cement paste by adding polycarboxylic type slump-releasing, dispersant. Cem Concr Res. 1999;29(2):223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adriano Papo, Luciano Piani. Effect of various superplasticizers on the rheological properties of Portland cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(11):2097–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burak Felekoglu, Hasan Sarlkahyaetal. Effect of chemical structure of polycarboxylate based superplasticizers on workability retention of self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22(9):1972–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hui Zhao, Ming Deng, Tang Mingshu. Effect of the molecular structure of monocyclic aromatic polymer on the application properties of concrete. Polym J. 2011;43(10):859–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hui Zhao, Weiling Zhou, Bo Gao. Synthesis and dispersion mechanism of AH polymers on cement particles. Adv Cem Res. 2012;24(1):42–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    BS EN 197. Part 1 Cement composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. British Standards Institution 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GOST10180. Concretes: methods for strength determination using reference specimens. Gosudarstvennye Standarty State Standard GOST 1990 (Russian).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    EN 1015–11. Methods of test for mortar for masonry—Part 11 determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened Mortar. British Standards Institution 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor HFW. Studies on the chemistry and microstructure of cement pastes. Proceedings of the British Ceramic Society; 1985. pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knapen E, Van Gemert D. Cement hydration and microstructure formation in the presence of water-soluble polymers. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(1):6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ru Wang, Xin-Gui Li, Pei-Ming Wang. Influence of polymer on cement hydration in SBR-modified cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(9):1744–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barbara Pacewska, Iwona Wilin′ska, Mariola Nowacka. Studies on the influence of different fly ashes and Portland cement on early hydration of calcium aluminate cement. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;106(3):859–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petkova V, Stoyanov V, Pelovski Y. TG-DTG-DTA in studying white self-compacting cement mortars. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109(2):797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palacios M, Puertas F, Bowen P, Houst YF. Effect of PCs superplasticizers on the rheological properties and hydration process of slag-blended cement pastes. J Mater Sci. 2009;44(10):2714–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frank Winnefeld, Stefan Becker, Joachim Pakusch, Thomas Gotz. Effects of the molecular architecture of comb-shaped superplasticizers on their performance in cementitious systems. Cem Concr Compos. 2007;29(4):251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kadri E-H, Aggoun S, De Schutter G. Interaction between C3A, silica fume and naphthalene sulphonate superplasticiser in high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23(10):3124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mollah MYA, Adams WJ, Schennach R, Cocke DL. Review of cement-superplasticizer interactions and their models. Adv Cem Res. 2000;12(4):153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yousuf M, Mollaht A, Padmavathy Palta, Thomas Hess R, Rajan Vempati K, David Cocke L. Chemical and Physical effects of sodium lignosulfonate superplasticizer on the hydration of Portland cement and solidification/stabilization consequences. Cem Concr Res. 1995;25(3):671–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rai US, Singh RK. Effect of polyacrylamide on the different properties of cement and mortar. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;392(1–2):42–50.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amanmyrat Jumadurdiyev, Hulusi Ozkul M, Ali Saglam R, Nazmiye Parlak. The utilization of beet molasses as a retarding and water-reducing admixture for concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(5):874–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joana Roncero, Susanna Valls, Ravindra Gettu. Study of the influence of superplasticizers on the hydration of cement paste using nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray diffraction techniques. Cem Concr Res. 2002;32(1):103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foray-Thevenin G, Vigier G, Vassoille R, Orange G. Characterization of cement paste by dynamic mechanical thermo-analysis Part I: operative conditions. Mater Charact. 2006;56(2):129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knapen E, Van Gemer D. Cement hydration and microstructure formation in the presence of water-soluble polymers. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(1):6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hidalgo A, Garcı′a JL, Cruz Alonso M, Ferna′ndez L, Andrade C. Microstructure development in mixes of calcium aluminate cement with silica fume or fly ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96(2):335–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh NB, Sarita Rai. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on the hydration of cement with rice husk ash. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31(2):239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Etsuo Sakai, Takayuki Kasuga, Tomomi Sugiyama, Kiyoshi Asaga, Masaki Daimon. Influence of superplasticizers on the hydration of cement and the pore structure of hardened cement. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(11):2049–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silva DA, John VM, Ribeiro JLD, Roman HR. Pore size distribution of hydrated cement pastes modified with polymers. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31(8):1177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Su Z, Sujata K, Bijen JM, Jennings HM, Fraaij ALA. The Evolution of the microstructure in Styrene Acrylate Polymer-Modified Cement Pastes at the Early Stage of Cement Hydration. Adv Cem Based Mater. 1996;3(3–4):87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Knapen E, Van Gemert D. Cement hydration and microstructure formation in the presence of water-soluble polymers. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(1):6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quan Liuquan, Li Dongxu, Li Zongjin. Effects of lignin cellulose and expansive agent on microstructure and macro-property of polymer-modified mortar containing fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23(6):2467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prince W, Edwards Lajnef M, Aıtcin C. Interaction between ettringite and a polynaphthalene sulfonate superplasticizer in a cementitious paste. Cem Concr Res. 2002;32(1):79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sinclair W, Groves GW. High strength cement pastes part 1 microstructures. J Mater Sci. 1985;20(8):2846–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Richard Morlat, Gilles Orange. Y. Bomal, Pierre Godard. Reinforcement of hydrated portland cement with high molecular mass water-soluble polymers. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(13):4858–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations