Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 723–727 | Cite as

Membrane proteins in thin films

A DSC study
  • E. Grell
  • A. Geoffroy
  • M. Stolz
  • E. Lewitzki
  • M. von Raumer


Molecular functions and structural changes of membrane proteins in an aqueous environment can be elucidated by reaction-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy upon photolysis of caged compounds. The achieved detection of IR band changes even due to single amino acid residues is, however, only possible in the presence of very high protein concentrations, implying that a low water content must be present. In general, the films are formed by controlled dehydration of membrane protein suspensions at reduced pressure and low temperature. For the retention of enzymatic activity of Na,K-ATPase, for example, a cosolvent such as glycerol is required. In order to interprete the results obtained by FTIR spectroscopy, it is important to know whether essential properties of the proteins such as hydration are changed upon film formation. Therefore, a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study has been carried out with purified Na,K-ATPase and Ca-ATPase in suspension, in form of pellets obtained by high-speed ultracentrifugation and in thin films. As relevant thermoanalytical properties, the endothermic denaturation transitions of the proteins have been studied.

For Na,K-ATPase in the presence of 20% glycerol as cosolvent, a single, comparatively narrow endothermic and irreversible denaturation transition with a denaturation enthalpy of about 1.7 MJ mol−1 and transition temperatures of about 65 and 70°C is found in concentrated suspension and in the state of the pellet, respectively. In the case of thin films suitable for IR spectroscopy, a characteristic change is observed in a reproducible manner. The enthalpy change of the remaining transition around 70°C is reduced but an additional transition at about 77°C is observed. Based on control experiments, the new high temperature transition is attributed to a partially dehydrated state of the protein. Furthermore, a comparatively broad endothermic transition around 20°C is found under conditions of high protein concentrations (film), which is tentatively assigned to a transition of the lipid environment of this integral membrane protein. Similar results are found for Ca-ATPase films. In the absence of glycerol, the deoxycholate treated enzyme in suspension exhibits a narrow endothermic main transition at 52°C with a denaturation enthalpy around 0.9 MJ mol−1. For the film of this protein, two almost equally large endothermic transitions are found at 59 and 77°C. Also here, the data are characteristic of partial protein dehydration. These results show clearly that DSC can easily be applied in a sensitive manner to control and characterize the integrity and hydration properties of concentrated protein samples in thin films.


Ca-ATPase DSC IR spectroscopy membrane proteins Na,K-ATPase protein film protein hydration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. Toyoshima, N. Nakasako, H. Nomura and H. Ogawa, Nature, 405 (2000) 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Barth, F. von Germar, W. Kreutz and W. Mäntele, J. Biol. Chem., 271 (1996) 30637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Thoenges, C. Tscherp, E. Grell and A. Barth, Biopolymers, 67 (2002) 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Stolz, E. Lewitzki, W. Mäntele, A. Barth and E. Grell, Biopolymers, 82 (2006) 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. L. Joergensen, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 356 (1974) 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Grell, E. Schick and E. Lewitzki, Thermochim. Acta, 380 (2001) 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. de Meis and W. Hasselbach, J. Biol. Chem., 246 (1971) 4759.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Champeil, S. Buschlen-Boucly, F. Bastide and C. Gary-Bobo, J. Biol. Chem., 253 (1978) 1179.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Meissner, G. E. Conner and S. Fleischer, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 298 (1973) 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Carrer, M. Stolz, E. Lewitzki, C. Rittmeyer, B. O. Kolbesen and E. Grell, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 385 (2006) 1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Stolz, E. Lewitzki, E. Schick, M. Mutz and E. Grell, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 986 (2003) 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. V. Grinberg, N. M. Gevondyan, N. V. Grinberg and V. Y. Grinberg, Eur. J. Biochem., 268 (2001) 5027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. R. Lepock, A. M. Rodahl, C. Zhang, M. L. Heynen, B. Waters and K.-H. Cheng, Biochem., 29 (1990) 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. M. Merino, J. V. Moller and C. Gutierrez-Merino, FEBS Letters, 343 (1994)155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Grell
    • 1
  • A. Geoffroy
    • 2
  • M. Stolz
    • 1
  • E. Lewitzki
    • 1
  • M. von Raumer
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute of BiophysicsFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Solvias AGBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations