Abstract
Between the 1980s and 2007, Portugal used to have one-stage (5-year period) initial teacher education (ITE) programs. In 2007 and consistent with the Bologna process guidelines, Portuguese teacher education moved toward a two-stage model, which includes a 3-year undergraduate program of subject matter that leads to a licenciatura (or bachelor) degree and a 3-year professional master in the teaching of a subject. The way that teacher educators perceive the ITE programs effects the education of prospective teachers and consequently the future of science education. This paper aims at analyzing how science teacher educators perceived the changes that took place in this formal way of educating junior school (7th–9th grades) and high school (10th–12th grades) science teachers in Portugal, due to the implementation of the Bologna guidelines. To attain the objectives of the study, 33 science teacher educators including science specialists and science education specialists answered an open-ended online questionnaire, which focused on the strengths and weaknesses of the pre- and post-Bologna ITE programs, the overall quality of teacher education and measures for improving ITE. The results indicate that science teacher educators were quite happy with all of the ITE models, but they expressed the belief that both the science and the teaching practice components should be strengthened in the post-Bologna masters in teaching. Meanwhile, changes were introduced in Portuguese educational laws, and they proved to be consistent with the opinions of the participants. However, the professional development of teacher educators along with evidence-based ITE programs seems to be necessary conditions for overcoming the challenges that teacher education is still facing in Portugal and worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bendl, S., Voňková, H., & Zvírotský, M. (2013). Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic. Pedagogická orientace, 23(6), 767–785.
Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Developing science teacher educators’ pedagogy of teacher education. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 401–416). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bianchini, J. (2012). Teaching while still learning to teach: Beginning science teachers’ views, experiences, and classroom practices. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 389–400). Dordrecht: Springer.
Boyle, S., Fahey, E., Loughran, J., & Mitchell, I. (2001). Classroom research into good learning behaviours. Educational Action Research, 9(2), 199–224.
Caena, F. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: An overview of policy issues. Brussels: European Commission.
Castro, R. (2015). Teacher education in Portugal: A history of transitions. In L. Leite, M. Flores, L. Dourado, M. Vilaça, & S. Morgado (Eds.), Proceedings of the ATEE annual conference 2014—Transitions in teacher education and professional identities (pp. 3–14). Brussels: ATEE.
Crawford, R. (2014). A pedagogic trinity: Exploring the art, craft and science of teaching. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 4(2), 77–84.
Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.
Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International Handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dillon, J., & Maguire, M. (2007). Developing as a beginning teacher. In J. Dillon & M. Maguire (Eds.), Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–25). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Drozka, W., & Madalinska-Michalak, J. (2015). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career in biographical experiences of prospective teachers. In L. Leite, M. Flores, L. Dourado, M. Vilaça, & S. Morgado (Eds.), Proceedings of the ATEE annual conference 2014—Transitions in teacher education and professional identities (pp. 93–203). Brussels: ATEE.
Eurydice. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Brussels: Eurydice.
Eurydice (2015). The teaching profession in Europe: Practices, perceptions, and policies. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Flores, M., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.
Flores, M., Santos, P., Fernandes, S., & Pereira, D. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ views of their training: Key issues to sustain quality teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 39–53.
Frost, J. (2010). Learning to be a science teacher. In J. Frost (Ed.), Learning to teach science in the secondary school: A companion to school experience 3 rd Ed (pp. 2–10). New York: Routledge.
Gil-Pérez, D. (1991). ¿Qué han de saber y saber hacer los profesores de ciencias? Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 9(1), 69–77.
Golan, M., & Fransson, G. (2009). Professional codes of conduct: Towards an ethical framework for novice teacher educators. In A. Swennen & M. Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators (pp. 45–57). Dordrecht: Springer.
Goodwin, A., & Kosnik, C. (2013). Quality teacher educators = quality teachers? Conceptualizing essential domains of knowledge for those who teach teachers. Teacher Development, 17(3), 334–346.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854.
Hilton, G., Flores, M., & Niklasson, L. (2013). Teacher quality, professionalism and professional development: Findings from a European project. Teacher Development, 17, 431–447.
Korthagen, F. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36, 407–423.
Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2015). The status of preservice science teacher education: A global perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 1–6.
Leite, C. (2005). Percursos e tendências recentes da formação de professores em Portugal. Educação, 3(57), 371–389.
Lima, L., Castro, R., Magalhães, J., & Pacheco, J. (1995). O modelo integrado vinte anos depois. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 8(2), 147–195.
Luehmann, A. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839.
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson International Edition.
Murray, J. (2014). Teacher educators’ constructions of professionalism: A case study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 7–21.
Musset, P. (2010). Initial teacher education and continuing training policies in a comparative perspective: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review on potential effects. OECD. doi:10.1787/5kmbphh7s47h-en. Accessed September 14, 2015.
Nelson, F. (2015). What we see when we look in the mirror: Conceptions of and intentions for reflection by science teacher educators. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–17.
Nunes, M., Rebelo, M., & Nascimento, M. (2010). A formação inicial de professores de física e química na Universidade de Coimbra: A evolução dos currículos no âmbito do processo de Bolonha. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 44(1), 195–214.
OECD. (2013). Supporting teacher educators for better learning outcomes. OECD. http://ec.europa.eu/education/school-education/teacher-cluster_en.htm. Accessed September 14, 2015.
OECD. (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2014-en. Accessed September 14, 2015.
Ogunniyi, M., & Rollnick, M. (2015). Pre-service science teacher education in Africa: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 65–79.
Olson, J., Tippett, C., Milford, T., Ohana, C., & Clough, M. (2015). Science teacher preparation in a North American context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 7–28.
Reis, P., & Camacho, G. (2009). A avaliação da concretização do processo de Bolonha numa instituição de ensino superior Portuguesa. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 15, 41–59.
Schneider, R. (2015). Pedagogical content knowledge reconsidered: A teacher educator’s perspective. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 162–177). New York: Routledge.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Snoek, M., & Zogla, I. (2009). Teacher education in Europe: Main characteristics and developments. In A. Swennen & M. Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators (pp. 11–27). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wallace, J., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teacher learning. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 295–306). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by CIEd—Research Centre in Education, Institute of Education, UMinho, UID/CED/01661/2013—through national funds of FCT/MCTES-PT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Leite, L., Dourado, L. & Morgado, S. Initial Science Teacher Education in Portugal: The Thoughts of Teacher Educators About the Effects of the Bologna Process. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 873–893 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9492-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9492-1