Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs
In this work, we present the design, implementation, and initial outcomes of the Climate Academy, a hybrid professional development program delivered through a combination of face-to-face and online interactions, intended to prepare formal and informal science teachers (grades 5–16) in teaching about climate change. The Climate Academy was designed around core elements of successful environmental professional development programs and aligned with practices advocated in benchmarked science standards. Data were collected from multiple sources including observations of professional development events, participants’ reflections on their learning, and collection of instructional units designed during the Academy. Data were also collected from a focal case study teacher in a middle school setting. Case study data included classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student beliefs toward climate change. Results indicated that the Climate Academy fostered increased learning among participants of both climate science content and pedagogical strategies for teaching about climate change. Additionally, results indicated that participants applied their new learning in the design of climate change instructional units. Finally, results from the case study indicated positive impacts on student beliefs and greater awareness about climate change. Results have implications for the design of professional development programs on climate change, a topic included for the first time in national standards.
KeywordsTeacher professional development Teacher knowledge Climate change Next generation science standards Student beliefs
- Barnett, M., Houle, M., Mark, S. L., Minner, D., Hirsch, L., Strauss, E., … Hufnagel, B. (2014). Participatory professional development: Geospatially enhanced urban ecological field studies. In J. MaKinster, N. Trautmann, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Teaching science and investigating environmental issues with geospatial technology: Designing effective professional development for teachers (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? School students’ ideas about the “greenhouse effect” a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 77–101.Google Scholar
- Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Gowda, M. V. R., Fox, J. C., & Magelky, R. D. (1997). Students’ understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(1), 2232–2240.Google Scholar
- Herman, J. (2013). Formative assessment for Next Generation Science Standards: A proposed model. Princeton, NJ: K-12 Center at ETS. Retrieved from http://www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/herman.pdf.
- Hirabyashi, J. (2011). CLEAN pathways informant survey #1. Inverness, CA: Inverness Research Associates. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-report/.
- Jickling, B. (2001). Climate change, global warming, and education with uncertainties. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
- Johnson, R. M. (2011). National earth science teachers’ association survey of the needs and concerns of K-12 earth and space science educators. Retrieved from http://www.nestanet.org/cms/sites/default/files/documents/ExecutiveSummaryClimateChangeEducationSurveyDecember2011.pdf.
- King, M., Shearon, E. L., Burgette, J. E., & Sivin-Kachala, J. (2012). Teaching climate change: Cumulative summary for the evaluation of PBS Teacher Line’s NASA Innovations in Climate Education online professional development. Retrieved from http://wwwtc.pbs.org/teacherline/courses/common_documents/research/pbs-cumulative-summary-final.pdf.
- Kirk, K. (2011). Teaching environmental issues and the affective domain. Retrieved from http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/affective/environment.html.
- Kubitskey, B. (2006). Extended professional development for systemic curriculum reform (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 889–909). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lynds, S. (2009). Inspiring climate education excellence program needs assessment survey report. Boulder: CIRES Education and Outreach, University of Colorado. Retrieved from http://cires.colorado.edu/files/9013/9577/9211/EO-ICEENeedsAssessmentReport.pdf.
- Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Mertz C. K., & Akerlof, K. (2011). Global warming’s Six Americas screening tools: Survey instruments; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://climatechangecommunication.org/SixAmericasManual.cfm.
- Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/GlobalWarmingsSixAmericas2009c.pdf.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). Climate change education in formal settings, K-14: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Pruneau, D., Moncton, U., Liboiron, L., & Vrain, E. (2001). People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 58–76.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, W. H. (2001). Defining teacher quality through content: Professional development implications from TIMSS. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development planning and design (pp. 141–164). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association and National Science Education Leadership Association.Google Scholar
- Shepardson, D. P., & Niyogi, D. (2012). An earth system science teacher professional development tool kit for climate science. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. Retrieved from http://iclimate.org/ccc/edu/static/workingMANUAL.pdf.
- Sondergeld, T. A., Milner, A., & Rop, C. (2014). Evaluating teachers’ self-perceptions of their knowledge and practice after participation in an environmental education professional development program. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 18, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yale/George Mason. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americans: An audience segmentation analysis. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/climatechange-6americas.pdf.