Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 235–258 | Cite as

Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs



In this work, we present the design, implementation, and initial outcomes of the Climate Academy, a hybrid professional development program delivered through a combination of face-to-face and online interactions, intended to prepare formal and informal science teachers (grades 5–16) in teaching about climate change. The Climate Academy was designed around core elements of successful environmental professional development programs and aligned with practices advocated in benchmarked science standards. Data were collected from multiple sources including observations of professional development events, participants’ reflections on their learning, and collection of instructional units designed during the Academy. Data were also collected from a focal case study teacher in a middle school setting. Case study data included classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student beliefs toward climate change. Results indicated that the Climate Academy fostered increased learning among participants of both climate science content and pedagogical strategies for teaching about climate change. Additionally, results indicated that participants applied their new learning in the design of climate change instructional units. Finally, results from the case study indicated positive impacts on student beliefs and greater awareness about climate change. Results have implications for the design of professional development programs on climate change, a topic included for the first time in national standards.


Teacher professional development Teacher knowledge Climate change Next generation science standards Student beliefs 


  1. Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1096–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., Houle, M., Mark, S. L., Minner, D., Hirsch, L., Strauss, E., … Hufnagel, B. (2014). Participatory professional development: Geospatially enhanced urban ecological field studies. In J. MaKinster, N. Trautmann, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Teaching science and investigating environmental issues with geospatial technology: Designing effective professional development for teachers (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The greenhouse effect: Children’s perception of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1994). The idea of secondary school children concerning ozone layer damage. Global Environmental Change, 4(5), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science and Technology Education, 15, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? School students’ ideas about the “greenhouse effect” a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 77–101.Google Scholar
  8. Dupigny-Girouz, L. L. (2010). Exploring the challenges of climate science literacy: Lessons from students, teachers and lifelong learners. Geography Compass, 4, 1203–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellins, K. K., Ledley, T. S., Haddad, N., McNeal, K., Gold, A., Lynds, S., & Libarkin, J. (2014). EarthLabs: Supporting teacher professional development to facilitate effective teaching of climate science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Gowda, M. V. R., Fox, J. C., & Magelky, R. D. (1997). Students’ understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(1), 2232–2240.Google Scholar
  12. Herman, J. (2013). Formative assessment for Next Generation Science Standards: A proposed model. Princeton, NJ: K-12 Center at ETS. Retrieved from
  13. Hestness, E., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirabyashi, J. (2011). CLEAN pathways informant survey #1. Inverness, CA: Inverness Research Associates. Retrieved from
  15. Hodson, D. (2013). Don’t be nervous, don’t be flustered, don’t be scared: Be prepared. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holthuis, N., Lotan, R., Saltzman, J., Mastrandrea, M., & Wild, A. (2014). Supporting and understanding students’ epistemological discourse about climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
  18. Jickling, B. (2001). Climate change, global warming, and education with uncertainties. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, R. M. (2011). National earth science teachers’ association survey of the needs and concerns of K-12 earth and space science educators. Retrieved from
  20. Johnson, R. M., Henderson, S., Gardiner, L., Russell, R., Ward, D., Foster, S., … Eastburn, T. (2008). Lessons learned through our climate change professional development program for middle and high school teachers. Physical Geography, 29, 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, M., Shearon, E. L., Burgette, J. E., & Sivin-Kachala, J. (2012). Teaching climate change: Cumulative summary for the evaluation of PBS Teacher Line’s NASA Innovations in Climate Education online professional development. Retrieved from
  22. Kirk, K. (2011). Teaching environmental issues and the affective domain. Retrieved from
  23. Kubitskey, B. (2006). Extended professional development for systemic curriculum reform (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  24. Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 889–909). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Lynds, S. (2009). Inspiring climate education excellence program needs assessment survey report. Boulder: CIRES Education and Outreach, University of Colorado. Retrieved from
  26. Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Mertz C. K., & Akerlof, K. (2011). Global warming’s Six Americas screening tools: Survey instruments; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from
  27. Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011b). Identifying like-minded audiences for climate change public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One, 6(3), e17571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from
  29. McGinnis, J. R., & Simmons, P. (1999). Teachers’ perspectives of teaching science–technology–society in local cultures: A sociocultural analysis. Science Education, 83, 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). Climate change education in formal settings, K-14: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Courque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pruneau, D., Moncton, U., Liboiron, L., & Vrain, E. (2001). People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 58–76.Google Scholar
  35. Roehrig, G., Campbell, K., Dalbotten, D., & Varma, K. (2012). CYCLES: A culturally-relevant approach to climate change education in native communities. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 6, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt, W. H. (2001). Defining teacher quality through content: Professional development implications from TIMSS. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development planning and design (pp. 141–164). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association and National Science Education Leadership Association.Google Scholar
  38. Shepardson, D. P., & Niyogi, D. (2012). An earth system science teacher professional development tool kit for climate science. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. Retrieved from
  39. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15, 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A., & Hirsch, A. (2012). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18, 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sondergeld, T. A., Milner, A., & Rop, C. (2014). Evaluating teachers’ self-perceptions of their knowledge and practice after participation in an environmental education professional development program. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 18, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yale/George Mason. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americans: An audience segmentation analysis. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole A. Shea
    • 1
  • Chrystalla Mouza
    • 2
  • Andrea Drewes
    • 2
  1. 1.Bio-Rad LaboratoriesHerculesUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations