Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 935–952 | Cite as

“Wow! Look at That!”: Discourse as a Means to Improve Teachers’ Science Content Learning in Informal Science Institutions

  • Gary M. Holliday
  • Judith S. Lederman
  • Norman G. Lederman
Article

Abstract

Currently, it is not clear whether professional development staff at Informal Science Institutions (ISIs) are considering the way exhibits contribute to the social aspects of learning as described by the contextual model of learning (CML) (Falk & Dierking in The museum experience. Whalesback, Washington, 1992; Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira Press, New York, 2000) and recommended in the reform documents (see Cox-Peterson et al. in Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40:200–218, 2003). In order to move beyond only preparing science teachers for field trips, while necessary, it is also important to understand the role exhibits play in influencing teachers’ content-related social interactions while engaged in ISI professional development. This study looked at a life science course that was offered at and taught by education staff of a large science and technology museum located in the Midwest, USA. The course was offered to three sections of teachers throughout the school year and met six times for a full day. The courses met approximately once a month from September through the beginning of June and provided 42 contact hours overall. Elementary and middle school teachers (n = 94) were audio- and videotaped while participating in the content courses and interacting with the museum’s exhibits. When considering the two factors within the sociocultural context of CML: within-group sociocultural mediation and facilitated mediation by others, the use of exhibits during both courses generally did not fully take into account these elements. In this study, it seemed that teachers’ talk always had a purpose but it is argued that it did not always have a direction or connection to the desired content or exhibit. When freely exploring the museum, teachers often purely reacted to the display itself or the novelty of it. However, when PD staff made explicit connections between exhibits, content, and activities, participants were more likely to be involved in in-depth, content-related and pedagogical conversations while engaged in the course.

Keywords

Professional development In-service science teacher education Informal learning environments Science education 

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49, 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astor-Jack, T., Balcerzak, P., & McCallie, E. (2006). Professional development and the historical tradition of informal science institutions: Views of four providers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Informal Learning and Schools. (2004). Informal science institutions and schools: A landscape study. San Franscisco, CA: Center for Informal Learning and Schools.Google Scholar
  6. Chesebrough, D. E. (1994). Informal science teacher preparation. Science Education International, 5, 28–34.Google Scholar
  7. Chin, C. C. (2004). Museum experience—A resource for science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox-Peterson, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback.Google Scholar
  10. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ferry, B. (1993). Science centers and outdoor education centers provide valuable experience for pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferry, B. (1995). Science centers in Australia provide valuable training for preservice teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.Google Scholar
  15. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81, 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hein, G. E. (1999). The constructivist museum. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 73–79). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hein, G. E., & Alexander, M. (1998). Museums: Places of learning. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.Google Scholar
  19. Holliday, G. M., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Comfort and content: Considerations for informal science professional development. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4, 356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inverness Research Associates. (1996). An invisible infrastructure: Institutions of informal science education. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centres.Google Scholar
  21. King, H. (2006). Why are they called explainers when they rarely explain? Researching and developing the role of museum educators in mediating visitors’ experiences in a hands-on gallery. Paper read at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Kisiel, J. F. (2003). Teachers, museums and worksheets: A closer look at a learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kisiel, J., Magdziarz, S., Ross, D., & Cox-Petersen, A. (2011). Exploring impacts of professional development for informal science educators. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching: Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, L. (2004). An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. Science Education, 88, S71–S82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melber, L. M. (2007). Museums and teacher professional development in science: Balancing educator needs and institutional mission. Science Educator, 16, 34–41.Google Scholar
  26. Melber, L. M., & Cox-Peterson, A. M. (2005). Teacher professional development and informal learning environments: Investigating partnerships and possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Neathery, M. F. (1998). Informal learning in experiential settings. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 10, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson, J. K., Cox-Petersen, A. M., & McComas, W. F. (2001). The inclusion of informal environments in science teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pedretti, E. G. (2004). Perspectives on learning through research on critical issues-based science center exhibitions. Science Education, 88, S34–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips, M., Finkelstein, D., & Wever-Frerichs, S. (2007). School site to museum floor: How informal science institutions work with schools. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1489–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schauble, L., Leinhardt, G., & Martin, L. (1997). A framework for organizing a cumulative research agenda in informal learning contexts. Journal of Museum Education, 22, 3–8.Google Scholar
  33. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1997). Seeing Tornado: How video traces mediate visitor understandings of (natural?) phenomena in a science museum. Science Education, 81, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevenson, J. (1991). The long-term impact of interactive exhibits. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2007). School visits to natural history museums: Teaching or enriching? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 747–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tran, L. U. (2007). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91, 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tran, L. U., & King, H. (2007). The professionalization of museum educators: The case in science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L.S. [1930, 1933, 1935] (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Reprint. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary M. Holliday
    • 1
  • Judith S. Lederman
    • 2
  • Norman G. Lederman
    • 3
  1. 1.Science Education, Curricular and Instructional StudiesThe University of AkronAkronUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Science EducationIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and Science EducationIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations