Skip to main content
Log in

Co-teaching Perspectives from Secondary Science Co-teachers and Their Students with Disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

An in-depth case study of one team of co-teachers’ practice from multiple perspectives is described. A high school science co-teaching team and their students with disabilities completed surveys about their perceptions of co-teaching. Additionally, observations of the two co-teachers occurred to determine roles and types of interactions for each co-teacher during science instruction. Observational data revealed effective teaching behaviors demonstrated by each co-teacher. Detailed descriptions of the co-teachers’ instruction are provided. The science educator was observed interacting with the large group twice as often as the special educator. The science educator also presented new content nearly three times as often as the special educator. The co-teacher surveys were consistent with the observational data. Both educators disagreed that the special educator was primarily the lead for instruction. Both educators strongly agreed they had an effective co-teaching relationship, although the science educator indicated stronger agreement for parity in roles and responsibilities than the special educator noted. Forty-three percent of the students identified the science educator as in charge of lessons, while 43% identified both educators. Most students thought teaching was divided in half, and all students enjoyed having two teachers in science. Eighty-six percent of the students indicated team teaching was the most frequently used co-teaching model, and 14% indicated one teach, one drift. Implications for co-teachers’ reflections on their collaboration, including the relevance of student perceptions (i.e., Who is the “real” teacher?), and the extent to which educators are prepared at preservice and inservice levels for co-teaching are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bessette, H. J. (2008). Using students’ drawings to elicit general and special educators’ perceptions of co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24, 1376–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouck, E. C. (2007). Co-teaching…Not just a textbook term: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 51(2), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudah, D. J., Schumacher, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1997). Collaborative teaching: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293–316. doi:10.2307/1511227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, F. J., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle, A. R., & Repp, A. C. (1984). An investigation of the accuracy of momentary time sampling procedures with time series data. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 481–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusca-Vega, R., Brown, K., & Yasutake, D. (2011). Science achievement of students in co-taught, inquiry-based classrooms. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for effective practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieker, L. A. (2001). What are the characteristics of ‘effective’ middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities? Preventing School Failure, 46, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eick, C. J., Ware, F. N., & Williams, P. G. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 74–85. doi:10.1177/0022487102238659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embury, D. C., & Kroeger, S. D. (2012). Let’s ask the kids: Consumer constructions of co-teaching. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, K. C. (2005). The effects of co-teaching on the achievement of eighth grade students with learning disabilities. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 11(2), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graue, E., Hatch, K., Rao, K., & Oen, D. (2007). The wisdom of class-size reduction. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 670–700. doi:10.3102/0002831207306755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R., & Alden, P. G. (2006). Teaching science to students with learning disabilities. The Science Teacher, 73(3), 26–31.

  • Harbort, G., Gunter, P. L., Hull, K., Brown, Q., Venn, M. L., Wiley, L. P., & Wiley, E. W. (2007). Behaviors of teacher in co-taught classes in a secondary school. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 13–23. doi:10.1177/088840640703000102

  • Hartwig, R., & Sitlington, P. L. (2008). Employer perspectives on high school diploma options for adolescents with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19, 5–14. doi:10.1177/1044207308315279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldenberg, E., Therrien, W., Watt, S., Gorsh, J., & Taylor, J. (2011). Three keys to success in science for students with learning disabilities. Science Scope, 35(3), 36–39.

  • Katsiyannis, A., Zhang, D., Ryan, J. B., & Jones, J. (2007). High-stakes testing and students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Research Policies, 18, 160–167. doi:10.1177/10442073070180030701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, S. A., Bargerhuff, M. E., Cowan, H., & Wheatly, M. (2007). Reflections of educators in pursuit of inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 663–692. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9052-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluth, P., & Straut, D. (2003). Do as we say and as we do: Teaching and modeling collaborative practice in the university classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 228–240. doi:10.1177/0022487103054003005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, K. W., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2009). General educators’ inservice training and their self-perceived ability to adapt instruction for students with IEPs. The Professional Educator, 33, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leafstedt, J. M., Richards, C., & LaMonte, M. (2007). Perspectives on co-teaching: Views from high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 79–85. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00123.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moin, L. J., Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2009). Instructional activities and group work in the US inclusive high school co-taught science class. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 7, 677–697. doi:10.1007/s10763-008-9133-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 227–247. doi:10.1080/10573560500455703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators—What does the research say? Teaching & Teacher Education, 25, 569–574. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J., Dowdy, A., & Nichols, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An educational promise for children with disabilities or a quick fix to meet the mandates of no child left behind? Education, 130, 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, J., & Houghton, S. (2008). The perceptions of secondary teachers and students about the implementation of an inclusive classroom model for students with mild disabilities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, C. E., & Miller, K. J. (2007). Co-taught middle school mathematics classrooms: Accommodations and enhancements for students with specific learning disabilities. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 29(2), 1–20.

  • Rice, D., & Zigmond, N. (2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teachers reports of developments in Australian and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 190–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2002). Teaching high school students with learning and emotional disabilities in inclusion science classrooms: A case study of four teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saudargas, R. A., & Zanolli, K. (1990). Momentary time sampling as an estimate of percentage time: A field validation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 533–537. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglem, R., & VanZant, M. (2010). Privileging students’ voices: A co-teaching philosophy that evokes excellence in all learners. English Journal, 100(2), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & McCulley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 498–510. doi:10.1002/pits.21606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therrien, W. J., Taylor, J. C., Hosp, J. L., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Gorsh, J. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB #1820-0517 (2010). “Part B, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Implementation of FAPE Requirements,” 2010. Data updated as of August 14, 2012.

  • Van Garderen, D., Stormont, M., & Goel, N. (2012). Collaboration between general and special educators and student outcomes: A need for more research. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 483–497. doi:10.1002/pits.21610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannest, K. J., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2010). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 126–142. doi:10.1177/0741932508327459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannest, K. J., Mason, B. A., Brown, L., Dyer, N., Maney, S., & Adiguzel, T. (2009). Instructional settings in science for students with disabilities: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 353–363. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9135-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret E. King-Sears.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King-Sears, M.E., Brawand, A.E., Jenkins, M.C. et al. Co-teaching Perspectives from Secondary Science Co-teachers and Their Students with Disabilities. J Sci Teacher Educ 25, 651–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9391-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9391-2

Keywords

Navigation