Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 589–595 | Cite as

Academic Freedom Legislation: The Latest Effort to Undermine the Integrity of Science and Science Education

  • Ian C. Binns
Article

On June 28, 2008, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal signed into law the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA), despite opposition from nine national scientific societies, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and numerous scientists around the country (Binns 2011; Forrest 2008). On April 10, 2012, Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam failed to veto House Bill 368/Senate Bill 893, nicknamed the “Monkey Bill” by its opponents, despite opposition from many of the same scientific organizations that opposed the LSEA, including AAAS (Roberts 2012).

The Louisiana and Tennessee laws followed the model “academic freedom” bill developed in September 2007 and introduced in February 2008 by the Discovery Institute (DI), an Intelligent Design think tank based in Seattle, WA, on a website called Academic Freedom Petition (DI 2008). The DI’s argument for the importance of this type of legislation is that it would “protect the rights of teachers and students to study the...

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Science Teacher Critical Thinking Academic Freedom Intelligent Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2010). Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America’s classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science, 331, 404–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2012). An evolving controversy: The struggle to teach science in science classes. American Educator, 36(2), 12–17, 20–23, 40.Google Scholar
  4. Binns, I. C. (2011). Battle over science in Louisiana. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 31(6). Retrieved from http://reports.ncse.com/.
  5. Binns, I. C., Shane, J. W., Bodzin, A. M., & Popejoy, K. (2013). ASTE position statement on teaching biological evolution. Retrieved from http://theaste.org/.
  6. Bird, W. R. (1987). The Supreme Court decision and its meaning. ICR Impact Series, no. 170. Retrieved from http://www.icr.org/.
  7. Bliss, R. (1983). Evolutionary indoctrination and decision-making in schools. ICR Impact Series, no. 120, i–iv. Retrieved from http://www.icr.org/article/213/.
  8. Branch, G., Scott, E. C., & Rosenau, J. (2010). Dispatches from the evolution wars: Shifting tactics and expanding battlefields. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 11, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brauer, M. J., Forrest, B., & Gay, S. G. (2005). Is it science yet?: Intelligent design creationism and the constitution. Washington University Law Review, 83(1), 1–149. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.wustl.edu/.
  10. Buckna, D., & Laidlaw, D. (1996). Should evolution be immune from critical analysis in the science classroom? ICR Impact Series, no. 282, i–iv. Retrieved from http://www.icr.org/article/411/.
  11. Discovery Institute. (2008). Academic freedom petition. Retrieved from http://www.academicfreedompetition.com/freedom.php.
  12. Discovery Institute. (2013). Discovery’s science education policy. Retrieved from http://www.discovery.org.
  13. Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987).Google Scholar
  14. Forrest, B. (2007). Understanding the intelligent design creationist movement: Its true nature and goals. A position paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Inquiry.Google Scholar
  15. Forrest, B. (2008). Analysis of SB 733: “LA science education act.” Retrieved from http://lasciencecoalition.org/2008/05/22/sb_733_analysis/.
  16. Forrest, B. (2010). It’s déjà vu all over again: The intelligent design movement’s recycling of creationist strategies. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 170–182.Google Scholar
  17. Hermann, R. S. (in press). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: Implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9328-6.
  18. Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005).Google Scholar
  19. Lofaso, A. M. (2009). Religion in the public schools: A road map for avoiding lawsuits and respecting parents’ legal rights. Washington, DC: Americans United for Separation of Church and State.Google Scholar
  20. Luskin, C. (2012). Academic freedom bill passes Tennessee state senate. Evolution News and Views. Retrieved from http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/03/academic_freedo057661.html. March 20, 2012.
  21. Matzke, N. J. (2010). The evolution of creationist movements. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 145–162.Google Scholar
  22. Matzke, N. J., & Gross, P. R. (2006). Analyzing critical analysis: The fallback antievolutionist strategy. In E. C. Scott & G. Branch (Eds.), Not in our classrooms: Why intelligent design is wrong for our schools (pp. 28–56). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, S. C. (2002). Teach the controversy. Cincinnati Enquirer, p. D3. March 22, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, K. R. (2002). Goodbye, Columbus. Reports of the NCSE, 22(2), 6–8.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, R. (2004). How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience, 54, 860–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore, R., & Kraemer, K. (2005). The teaching of evolution & creationism. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 457–460, 462–463, 465–466.Google Scholar
  27. National Center for Science Education. (2013a). Anticlimate bill in Kansas. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/news/2013/02/anticlimate-bill-kansas-0014713.
  28. National Center for Science Education. (2013b). Antiscience bill dies in Indiana. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/news/2013/02/antiscience-bill-dies-indiana-0014726.
  29. National Center for Science Education. (2013c). Chronology of “academic freedom” bills. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/creationism/general/chronology-academic-freedom-bills.
  30. National Center for Science Education. (2013d). A stealth antiscience bill in Indiana. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/news/2013/01/stealth-antiscience-bill-indiana-0014693.
  31. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, J. (2012). Tennessee evolution bill becomes law without governor’s signature. Memphis Commercial Appeal. Retrieved from http://www.commercialappeal.com/. April 10, 2012.
  34. Rosenau, J. (2010). Leap of faith: Intelligent design’s trajectory after Dover. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 4, 280–327.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, E. C. (2007). What’s wrong with the “teach the controversy” slogan? McGill Journal of Education, 42, 307–315.Google Scholar
  36. Scott, E. C. (2009). Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, E. C., & Branch, G. (2003). Evolution: What’s wrong with “teaching the controversy?”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiles, J., & Branch, G. (2008). Teachers who won’t, don’t, or can’t teach evolution properly: A burning issue. The American Biology Teacher, 70, 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Reading and Elementary EducationUNC CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations