The Effect of a State Department of Education Teacher Mentor Initiative on Science Achievement
- 244 Downloads
This study investigated the effectiveness of a southern state’s department of education program to improve science achievement through embedded professional development of science teachers in the lowest performing schools. The Science Mentor Program provided content and inquiry-based coaching by teacher leaders to science teachers in their own classrooms. The study analyzed the mean scale scores for the science portion of the state’s high school graduation test for the years 2004 through 2007 to determine whether schools receiving the intervention scored significantly higher than comparison schools receiving no intervention. The results showed that all schools achieved significant improvement of scale scores between 2004 and 2007, but there were no significant performance differences between intervention and comparison schools, nor were there any significant differences between various subgroups in intervention and comparison schools. However, one subgroup, economically disadvantaged (ED) students, from high-level intervention schools closed the achievement gap with ED students from no-intervention schools across the period of the study. The study provides important information to guide future research on and design of large-scale professional development programs to foster inquiry-based science.
KeywordsScience education Coaching Mentoring Inquiry Economically disadvantaged
- Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
- Bybee, R. (2009). Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 and scientific literacy: A perspective for science education leaders. Science Educator, 18(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Dossey, J.A., McCrone, S.A., & O’Sullivan, C. (2006). Problem solving in the PISA and TIMSS 2003 assessments (NCES 2007-049). U. S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved August 25, 2009 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
- Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A reexamination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–296.Google Scholar
- Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645.Google Scholar
- Kimble, L. L., Yager, R. E., & Yager, S. O. (2006). Success of a professional-development model in assisting teachers to change their teaching to match the more emphasis conditions urged in the National Science Education Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klum, G., & Stuessy, C. (1992). Assessment in science and mathematics education reform (Chapter 5). In G. Klum & S. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
- Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 720–747.Google Scholar
- Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130–137.Google Scholar
- National Center for Educational Statistics. (1995) Third International Mathematics and Science Study. 1995. Retrieved October 15, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov.timss .
- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved Mar 21, 2004 from http://nces.ed.gov.nationsreportcard/ .
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Peneul, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A. E., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. M. (2009). Teaching for understanding in earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PISA (2009) Assessment framework key competencies in reading, mathematics and science (pp. 125–148). (Adobe Digital Editions), Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/40/44455820.pdf.
- Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
- Saurino, D., & Saurino, P. (1999). Making efficient use of mentoring programs: a collaborative group action research approach. Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (pp. 1–18). Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Schwab, J. J. (1964). The teaching of science as enquiry. In Schwab, J. J. & Brandwein, P. F. (Eds.), The teaching of science, (pp. 3–103). Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2004). High school graduation test results.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2005a). High school graduation test results.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2005b). Science mentor handbook.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2006). High school graduation test results.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2007a). High school graduation test results.Google Scholar
- State Education Agency, (2007b). HSGT science content descriptors.Google Scholar
- Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357–381.Google Scholar
- Wilson, M., & Bertenthal, M. (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, C., Taylor, J., Kowalski, S., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.Google Scholar