Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 729–743 | Cite as

Developing Pedagogical Practices to Enhance Confidence and Competence in Science Teacher Education

  • Dawn Garbett
Article

Abstract

The aim of this self-study research was to deepen my understanding of pedagogy for teacher education and the factors that enhanced and hindered my confidence and competence as a teacher educator. I recorded my impressions and descriptions of events, discussions, and interpretations as a result of studying my practice in an electronic journal. Student teachers’ responses to questionnaires, peer evaluation guidelines, and interviews provided alternative views about the efficacy of my pedagogy. Data collection and analysis was a hermeneutic and recursive process revealing emergent themes. One theme was that a focus on science content knowledge gave a false sense of confidence and overshadowed our ability to engage in meaningful conversations about learning to teach—a practice challenged through self-study research.

Keywords

Self-study Teacher education pedagogy Science teacher education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge my critical friends John Loughran and Alan Ovens for their unwavering support and to thank the reviewers and Liz McKinley for their constructive feedback and helpful advice.

References

  1. Alderman, M. K. (1999). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers’ development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bolton, G. (2005). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Education ReviewOffice. (2004). The quality of teaching in years 4 and 8 in science. Wellington, NZ: Education Review Office, Education Evaluation Reports.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, J. D. (2001). A dilemma in reforming science teacher education: Responding to students’ concerns or striving for higher standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garbett, D. (2007). Science teacher education: Fostering confidence and competence. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Monash University: Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Garbett, D. (2011). Constructivism deconstructed in science teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), Article 3. Available at: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss6/3.
  12. Ham, V., & Kane, R. (2004). Finding a way through the swamp: A case for self-study as research. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 103–150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holly, M. L. (1989). Writing to grow: Keeping a personal-professional journal. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 755–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King, K. P., & Wiseman, D. L. (2001). Comparing science efficacy beliefs of elementary education majors in integrated and non-integrated teacher education coursework. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research from design to implementation. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lassonde, C. A., Galman, S., & Kosnik, C. (2009). Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Long, D. T., & Stuart, C. (2004). Supporting higher levels of reflection among teacher candidates: A pedagogical framework. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 10, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Lowery, V. N. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGookin, M. (2002). I can’t let them down!: Affiliative motivation and cooperative learning in higher education. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International conference of the higher education research and development society of Australia (pp. 417–425). Perth, WA.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (2005). Just who do we think we are…and how do we know this? In C. Mitchell, S. Weber, & K. O’Reilly-Scanlon (Eds.), Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching (pp. 1–9). London, England: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers, C. B. (2002). Can self-study challenge the belief that telling, showing, and guided practice constitute adequate teacher education? In J. J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 130–142). London, England: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  26. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  27. Palmer, D. H. (2001). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Teacher Education, 86, 122–137.Google Scholar
  28. Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science education methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preece, P. F. W. (2004). Investigating the ‘failure of further learning’ effect in preservice science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russell, T., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2007). Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education values, relationships, and practices. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  31. Samaras, A. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2009). Looking back and looking forward: An historical overview of the self-study school. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Schagen, S., & Hipkins, R. (2008). Curriculum changes, priorities, and issues. Findings from the NZCER secondary 2006 and primary 2007 national surveys. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  34. Shallcross, T., & Spink, E. (2002). How primary trainee teachers perceive the development of their own scientific knowledge: Links between confidence, content, and competence? International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1293–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shepard, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory method, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Symington, D., & Kirkwood, V. (1995). Science in the primary school classroom. In B. Hand & V. Prain (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science: The constructivist classroom (pp. 193–207). Sydney, NSW: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  38. Tidwell, D., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (2004). Self-study as teaching. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self- study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 69–103). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trumbull, D. (2004). Factors important for the scholarship of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 1211–1230). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolf-Watz, M. (2000). Student teachers’ beliefs about science. Journal of Inservice Education, 26, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations