Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 53–78 | Cite as

Practicing What We Teach: A Self-Study in Implementing an Inquiry-Based Curriculum in a Middle Grades Classroom

  • Michael Dias
  • Charles J. Eick
  • Laurie Brantley-Dias


A science teacher educator returned to teaching adolescents after more than 10 years in the professoriate. We studied his beliefs, practice and daily use of inquiry pedagogy while implementing a reform-based curriculum. Reflection on practice was evidenced by a weekly journal, classroom observations and debriefings, and extensive interviews. Newly developed practical knowledge from this experience shifted the science teacher educator’s beliefs away from the Piagetian structuralism espoused in prescribed curricula towards a more culturally responsive, student-driven approach to teaching science to middle grades students. The merits and limitations of curricula attempting to follow traditional scientific practices are discussed.


Inquiry Middle grades Curriculum Self-study Practical knowledge Conceptual change Scientific practices 


  1. Beeth, M. E., & Hewson, P. W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83, 738–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennet, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Chiodo, J. J. (2004). Going back to the classroom: From the university to the public school. Clearing House, 77, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, C., & Lampert, M. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Relevance for teaching and learning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching ways of knowing (pp. 174–198). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Chicago, IL: D.C. Heath.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience through coteaching: Studying methods students’ thinking on practice in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89(3), 470–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eick, C., Dias, M., & Cook Smith, N. (2009). Middle school students’ conceptual learning from the implementation of a new NSF supported curriculum: Interactions in physical science™. School Science and Mathematics, 109(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eick, C., & Samford, K. (1999). Techniques for new teachers. The Science Teacher, 66(8), 34–37.Google Scholar
  16. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Eunmi, L., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 218–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, F., Bendall, S., Heller, P., & Poel, R. (2006). Interactions in physical science. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson-Ross, S., & McWhorter, P. (1997). Findings from a yearlong job exchange: A mentor teacher’s bill of rights in teacher education (Reading Report No. 74). Athens, GA/College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED402559).Google Scholar
  21. Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, M. T., & Eick, C. J. (2007a). Implementing inquiry-based kits: Obstacles, pedagogy, and practical knowledge development in two middle school science teachers. Science Education, 91(3), 492–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, M. T., & Eick, C. J. (2007b). Providing bottom-up support to middle school science teachers’ reform efforts in using inquiry-based kits. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 913–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korthagen, F. A. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Kumar, D. D., & Chubin, D. E. (Eds.). (1999). Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenium Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development program on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34–37.Google Scholar
  33. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  37. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Noddings, N. (1996). Stories and affect in teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Northfield, J. (1994). Research as teacher: Making the learning accessible. The teacher educator/researcher as teacher: Studying personal practice to improve teacher education. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  40. O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 791–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) reference manual. Technical Report (Report No. ACEPT-TR-IN00-32). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (ERIC Document\Reproduction Service No. ED447205).Google Scholar
  43. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shanahan, M., & Nieswandt, M. (2009). Creative activities and their influence on identification in science: Three case studies. Journal of Elementary Education, 21, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.Google Scholar
  47. Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 930–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wallace, C. S., & Oliver, J. S. (2003). Journaling during a school-based secondary methods course: Exploring a route to teaching reflection. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Dias
    • 1
  • Charles J. Eick
    • 2
  • Laurie Brantley-Dias
    • 3
  1. 1.Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA
  2. 2.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  3. 3.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations