Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 683–701 | Cite as

A Study of Teacher-Mediated Enhancement of Students’ Organization of Earth Science Knowledge Using Web Diagrams as a Teaching Device

  • O. Roger Anderson
  • Julie Contino
Article

Abstract

Current research indicates that students with enhanced knowledge networks are more effective in learning science content and applying higher order thinking skills in open-ended inquiry learning. This research examined teacher implementation of a novel teaching strategy called “web diagramming,” a form of network mapping, in a secondary school earth science class. We report evidence for student improvement in knowledge networking, questionnaire-based reports by the students on the merits of web diagramming in terms of interest and usefulness, and information on the collaborating teacher’s perceptions of the process of implementation, including implications for teacher education. This is among the first reports that teachers can be provided with strategies to enhance student knowledge networking capacity, especially for those students whose initial networking scores are among the lowest.

Keywords

Cognitive structure Earth science learning Knowledge networks 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was funded in part by financial support from Teachers College Columbia University. This is Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Contribution Number 7319.

References

  1. Anderson, O. R. (2009). The role of knowledge network structures in learning scientific habits of mind: Higher order thinking and inquiry skills. In I. M. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Fostering scientific habits of mind: Pedagogical knowledge and best practices in science education (pp. 59–82). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. (1993). A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 953–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, O. R., Randle, D., & Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students. Science Education, 85, 410–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, New Series, 255, 556–559.Google Scholar
  5. Baxendell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative: The 3 C’s of graphic organisers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 46–53.Google Scholar
  6. Bischoff, P. J. (2002). The role of knowledge frameworks play in the ability of preservice elementary teachers to explain the operation of a St. Louis motor. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bischoff, P. J., & Anderson, O. R. (1998). A case study analysis of the development of knowledge schema, ideational networks and higher cognitive operations among high school students who studied ecology. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bischoff, P. J., & Anderson, O. R. (2001). Development of knowledge frameworks and higher order cognitive operations among secondary school students who studied a unit on ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 81–88.Google Scholar
  9. Bischoff, P. J., Avery, L., Golden, C. F., & French, P. (2010). An analysis of knowledge structure, diversity and diagnostic abilities among preservice science teachers within the domain of oxidation and reduction chemistry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1962). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. S. (2009). Understanding of earth and space science concepts: Strategies for concept-building in elementary teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 109, 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhindsa, H., & Anderson, O. R. (2004). Using a conceptual-change approach to help preservice science teachers reorganize their knowledge structures for constructivist teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, W. J., & Wendlandt, R. F. (2007). Weathering of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks in a semi-arid climate—Clay mineralogy in a geological engineering context. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 295–309.Google Scholar
  15. Kennelly, P. (2009). An online social networking approach to reinforce learning of rocks and minerals. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57, 33–40.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, E. B. (2008). Content is not enough: A history of secondary earth science teacher preparation with recommendations for today. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 445–455.Google Scholar
  17. Longo, P. J., Anderson, O. R., & Wicht, P. (2002). Visual thinking networking Promotes problem solving achievement for 9th grade earth science students. The Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7, 1–51. http://www.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev7n1.html.
  18. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okey, J. R., & Gagne, R. M. (1970). Revision of a science topic using evidence of performance on subordinate skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orion, N., & Kali, Y. (2005). The effect of an earth-science learning program on students’ scientific thinking skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 387–393.Google Scholar
  21. Penuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A. E., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. M. (2009). Teaching for understanding in earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ring, D. G., & Novak, J. D. (1971). The effects of cognitive structure variables on achievement in college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sell, K. S., Herbert, B. E., Stuessy, C. L., & Schielack, J. (2006). Supporting student conceptual model development of complex earth systems through the use of multiple representations and inquiry. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 396–407.Google Scholar
  24. Shavelson, R. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1975). Concept validation: Methodology and application to three measures of cognitive structure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tretinjak, C., & Riggs, E. M. (2008). Enhancement of geology content knowledge through field-based instruction for preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 422–433.Google Scholar
  26. Tsai, C.-C. (1998). An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders’ science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs, and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163–169.Google Scholar
  28. Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Using a “conflict map” as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsai, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-J. (2005). The role of “core” and “anchored” concepts in knowledge recall. Knowledge Organization, 32, 143–158.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, J. M. (1994). Network representations of knowledge about chemical equilibrium: Variations with achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1133–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2005). Development of elementary school students’ cognitive structures and information processing strategies under long-term constructivist-oriented science instruction. Science Education, 89, 822–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia University Teachers CollegeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia UniversityPalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations