Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

K-8 Educators Perceptions and Preparedness for Teaching Evolution Topics

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Many science education standards mandate teaching evolution concepts in the K-8 curriculum. Yet, not all K-8 certified educators embrace the notion of teaching evolution content Factors influencing K-8 teacher engagement with evolution curriculum include evolution familiarity and personal beliefs conflicts. With this in mind, we investigated the perceptions and beliefs about evolution of educators who had completed a science and mathematics education master’s degree. Our quantitative and qualitative data indicate some participants did not feel prepared or responsible for teaching evolution content. The discussion of our study results and implications was done in the context of achieving science learning standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Education, 76, 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56, 1891–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1997). Resources for science literacy: Professional development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. W. (1989). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of science: Science, theories and evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohning, G., & Hale, L. (1998). Images of self-confidence and the change-of-career prospective elementary science teacher. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 10(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on Educational Policy. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools a closer look at changes for specific subjects. Retrieved November 26, 2008 from http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document.showDocumentByID&nodeID = 1&DocumentID=234.

  • Chuang, H. C. (2003). Teaching evolution: Attitudes and strategies of educators in Utah. American Biology Teacher, 65, 669–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2009). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89(3), 378–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35, 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J., & Filer, J. (1999). Science process skills and attitudes of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiriksson, S. (1997). Preservice teachers’ perceived constraints of teaching science in the elementary classroom. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulp, S. L. (2002). The status of elementary school science teaching. Retrieve on January 16, 2008 from: http://www.horizon-research.com/reports/2002/2000survey/elem_sci.php.

  • Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2004). Changing minds: Developmental education for conceptual change. Journal of Adult Development, 11(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715–737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., Pell, A., & McKeon, F. (2003). Changes in primary teachers’ science knowledge and understanding during a two year in-service programme. Research in Science & Technology Education, 21(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesky-Smith, R. (2002). Me, teach science? Science and Children, 39(6), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. J., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S. (1998). The role of teaching and learning in systemic reform: A focus on professional development. Science Educator, 7, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. (2001). Effect of a curriculum containing creation stories on attitudes about evolution. American Biology Teacher, 63(6), 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2006). Investigating evolutionary biology in the laboratory. Dubuque, WI: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. R. (1999). Finding Darwin’s God: A scientist’s search for common ground between God and evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2001). Teaching evolution: Do state standards matter? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 21(1–2), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S. (2009). Preservice teacher understanding and vision of how to teach biological evolution. Evolution education and Outreach, 2(3), 490–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., & Schrader, C. (2009). A systemic solution: Elementary-teacher preparation in stem expertise and engineering awareness. Austin, TX: Proceedings of the American society for engineering education annual conference & exhibition.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (1997). An NSTA position statement on the teaching of evolution. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(1), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (2002). An NSTA position statement: Elementary school science. Arlington, VA: NSTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation. Retrieved on January 16, 2008 from http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.

  • National Science Teachers Association. (2006). An NSTA position statement: Professional development in science education. Arlington, VA: NSTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintó, R., Couso, D., & Gutierrez, R. (2005). Using research on teachers’ transformations of innovations to inform teacher education. The case of energy degradation. Science Education, 89(1), 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plourde, L. (2002). Elementary science education: The influence of student teaching—Where it all begins. Education, 123(2), 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoog, G., & Bilica, K. (2002). The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: A lever for change in evolution education? Science Education, 86, 445–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, G. (1993). Relationship between science knowledge levels and beliefs toward science instruction held by preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, D. Y. (2001). Promoting the development of a conceptual change model of science instruction in prospective secondary biology teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 755–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1700, USA

    Louis S. Nadelson & Sandra Nadelson

Authors
  1. Louis S. Nadelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Nadelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis S. Nadelson.

About this article

Cite this article

Nadelson, L.S., Nadelson, S. K-8 Educators Perceptions and Preparedness for Teaching Evolution Topics. J Sci Teacher Educ 21, 843–858 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9171-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9171-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation